IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331620.html

Prices, Social Accounts and Economic Models

Author

Listed:
  • McDonald, Scott

Abstract

Despite the fact that SAMs are widely used as the databases for CGE models there remains some confusion over the relationship between the two; in particular the implications and meaning of the 'law of one price’ appear to be poorly understood. This has two clear, and arguably, worrying implications. First, a deficiency in understanding the accounting relationships in a SAM means that when compiling a SAM it is likel that the structural relationships in the economy may be misrepresented. And second, any misunderstanding of the behavioural relationships in a CGE model, which can be defined as theory with numbers, is highly likely to lead to flawed interpretations of the results from such models. The discussion in this paper revisits the issues of the role of a price system in social accounts and then demonstrates how the resultant price definitions require that all whole economy models that satisfy the conditions of being both complete and consistent MUST obey the 'law of one price’. The relevance of the 'law’ to the characteristics of certain features of CGE models is demonstrated as is its relevance to the compilation of SAMs.

Suggested Citation

  • McDonald, Scott, 2007. "Prices, Social Accounts and Economic Models," Conference papers 331620, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331620/files/3261.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arjan Lejour, 2003. "Quantifying four scenarios for Europe," CPB Document 38, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Olav Schram stokke, 2004. "Trade Measures and Climate Compliance: Institutional Interplay Between WTO and the Marrakesh Accords," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 339-357, December.
    3. repec:aen:journl:2005v26-04-a06 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Frank Biermann & Rainer Brohm, 2004. "Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the USA: the strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 289-302, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Veenendaal & Ton Manders, 2008. "Border tax adjustment and the EU-ETS, a quantitative assessment," CPB Document 171, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Nora Dihel & Ben Shepherd, 2007. "Modal Estimates of Services Barriers," OECD Trade Policy Papers 51, OECD Publishing.
    3. F. J. H. Don & J. P. Verbruggen, 2006. "Models and methods for economic policy: 60 years of evolution at CPB," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 60(2), pages 145-170, May.
    4. Arjan Lejour & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa, 2008. "International spillovers of domestic reforms: the joint application of the Lisbon Strategy in the EU," CPB Discussion Paper 105.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    5. Yildirim, Ertugrul & Aslan, Alper & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2012. "Coal consumption and industrial production nexus in USA: Cointegration with two unknown structural breaks and causality approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6123-6127.
    6. Rashed, Yasmine & Meersman, Hilde & Sys, Christa & Van de Voorde, Eddy & Vanelslander, Thierry, 2018. "A combined approach to forecast container throughput demand: Scenarios for the Hamburg-Le Havre range of ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 127-141.
    7. Arjan Lejour & Paul Veenendaal & Gerard Verweij & Nico van Leeuwen, 2006. "Worldscan; a model for international economic policy analysis," CPB Document 111.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Doan, Nguyen & Doan, Huong & Nguyen, Canh Phuc & Nguyen, Binh Quang, 2024. "From Kyoto to Paris and beyond: A deep dive into the green shift," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. de Bruijn, Roland & Kox, Henk & Lejour, Arjan, 2008. "Economic benefits of an Integrated European Market for Services," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 301-319.
    10. van Asselt, Harro & Biermann, Frank, 2007. "European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: a legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 497-506, January.
    11. Ziying Chen & Jin-Tae Kim, 2024. "Study on the Influence of International Economic Law of Carbon Emission Trading on Environmental Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Gelauff, George & Lejour, Arjan, 2006. "The new Lisbon Strategy: An estiamtion of the impact of reaching 5 Lisbon targets," MPRA Paper 16168, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. George Gelauff & Arjan Lejour, 2006. "Five Lisbon highlights; the economic impact of reaching these targets," CPB Document 104.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    14. Henk Don & Johan Verbruggen, 2006. "Models and methods for economic policy; 60 years of evolution at CPB," CPB Discussion Paper 55.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    15. Sakai, Marco & Barrett, John, 2016. "Border carbon adjustments: Addressing emissions embodied in trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 102-110.
    16. Wim Suyker & P. Buitelaar & Henri de Groot, 2007. "India and the Dutch economy; stylised facts and prospects," CPB Document 155, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    17. Wim Suyker & Henri de Groot, 2006. "China and the Dutch economy," CPB Document 127, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    18. Arjan Lejour & Henk Kox & Roland de Bruijn, 2006. "The trade-induced effects of the Services Directive and the country of origin principle," CPB Document 108, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    19. Arjan Lejour & Paul Veenendaal & Gerard Verweij & Nico van Leeuwen, 2006. "Worldscan; a model for international economic policy analysis," CPB Document 111, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    20. Legge, Thomas & Scott, Susan, 2009. "Policy Options to Reduce Ireland's GHG Emissions [Instrument choice: the pros and cons of alternative policy instruments]," Papers WP284, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.