IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nccc26/409062.html

Food Security Outcomes under STI Policy Implementation: Comparative Evidence from Selected ASEAN Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Pham, Dung Van
  • Napasintuwong, Orachos

Abstract

Southeast Asia faces increasing food security challenges arising from rapid urbanization, rising food prices, and low productivity growth. While Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) policies are widely promoted as a cornerstone for transforming agrifood systems, inadequate evidence of how specific STI interventions translate into measurable food security outcomes explains uneven impacts and raises concerns about inefficient resource allocation. This paper aims to comparatively assess the achievements of food security outcomes under the agri-food STI policy implementation across the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member states. Data were collected from international and national available sources and analyzed based on a framework of impact assessment. The findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in STI capacities and their effectiveness in improving food security. Malaysia and Vietnam emerged as the strongest performers overall, supported by relatively robust innovation systems, higher food access, and improved utilization outcomes. Vietnam, in particular, demonstrated the most effective transformation of agri-food STI inputs into outcomes, achieving the highest agricultural total factor productivity (TFP) growth and gains in food production and nutrition indicators. Indonesia showed large-scale agricultural output and innovation activity but exhibited fragmentation and underutilization of its research capacity. Thailand maintained stable production and affordability; however, the country faced persistent challenges in nutrition and food utilization. The Philippines had low growth due to limited agri-food STI investment, weaker human capital, and higher vulnerability to external shocks. Across all countries, food stability and nutrition-related outcomes remain the weakest dimensions, highlighting the limitations of production-oriented STI approaches. The results suggest that agri-food STI policies contribute most effectively to food security if they are well-coordinated, adequately funded, and aligned with inclusive objectives. Strengthening governance, enhancing human capital, and rebalancing STI strategies toward resilience and equity are critical for achieving sustainable food security in ASEAN.

Suggested Citation

  • Pham, Dung Van & Napasintuwong, Orachos, 2026. "Food Security Outcomes under STI Policy Implementation: Comparative Evidence from Selected ASEAN Countries," 2026 Conference, April 20-21, 2026, Chicago, Illinois 409062, NCR-134/ NCCC-134 Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nccc26:409062
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.409062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/409062/files/1.Food%20Security%20Outcomes%20under%20STI%20Policy%20Implementation%20Comparative%20Evidence%20from%20Selected%20ASEAN%20Countries.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.409062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuai Qin & Hong Chen, 2024. "Scientific and Technological Innovation Effects on High-Quality Agricultural Development: Spatial Boundaries and Mechanisms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Paul J. Gertler & Sebastian Martinez & Patrick Premand & Laura B. Rawlings & Christel M. J. Vermeersch, . "Impact Evaluation in Practice, First Edition [La evaluación de impacto en la práctica]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2550.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sakaue, Katsuki, 2018. "Informal fee charge and school choice under a free primary education policy: Panel data evidence from rural Uganda," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 112-127.
    2. Małgorzata Michalewska-Pawlak & Monika Klimowicz, 2021. "The impact of the Government Program for Social Participation of Senior Citizens (ASOS) on social activation of the elderly in Poland: Findings from a qualitative study," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17.
    3. Ian Anderson & Andreasta Meliala & Puti Marzoeki & Edo Pambudi, 2014. "The Production, Distribution, and Performance of Physicians, Nurses, and Midwives in Indonesia: An Update," Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper Series 91324, The World Bank.
    4. Andrea Bellucci & Luca Pennacchio & Alberto Zazzaro, 2019. "Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 213-240, January.
    5. Ilmiawan Auwalin, 2021. "The effect of a credit policy change on microenterprise upward transition and growth: evidence from Indonesia," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 611-636, December.
    6. Lane, Julia I. & Owen-Smith, Jason & Rosen, Rebecca F. & Weinberg, Bruce A., 2015. "New linked data on research investments: Scientific workforce, productivity, and public value," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1659-1671.
    7. Dammert, Ana C. & de Hoop, Jacobus & Mvukiyehe, Eric & Rosati, Furio C., 2018. "Effects of public policy on child labor: Current knowledge, gaps, and implications for program design," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 104-123.
    8. Müller, Anna K. & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "Financial literacy and food safety standards in Guatemala: The heterogeneous impact of GlobalGAP on farm income," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 199383, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    9. Andrea Bellucci & Luca Pennacchio & Alberto Zazzaro, 2019. "R&D Subsidies and Firms’ Debt Financing," CSEF Working Papers 527, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    10. Gelo, Dambala & Koch, Steven F., 2014. "The Impact of Common Property Right Forestry: Evidence from Ethiopian Villages," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 395-406.
    11. Mariana Alfonso & María Soledad Bos & Jesús Duarte & Carlos Rondón & Norbert Schady & Aimee Verdisco & Hugo R. Ñopo & Martín Moreno & Alejandra Mizala & Carlos Gargiulo & Eugenio Severin & Christine C, 2012. "Educación para la transformación," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 78098 edited by Marcelo Cabrol & Miguel Székely, February.
    12. Sara Johansson de Silva & Pierella Paci & Josefina Posadas, 2014. "Lessons Learned and Not Yet Learned from a Multicountry Initiative on Women's Economic Empowerment," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 16377.
    13. Andrea Bellucci & Luca Pennacchio & Alberto Zazzaro, 2016. "Public subsidies for SME research and development: Empirical evaluation of collaborative versus individual place-based programs," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 133, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    14. Cornwall, Andrea & Aghajanian, Alia, 2017. "How to Find out What’s Really Going On: Understanding Impact through Participatory Process Evaluation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 173-185.
    15. Sarah Avellar & Robert Santillano & Debra Strong, "undated". "Tips for Planning an Impact Evaluation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports df6853f1de6344f9997340333, Mathematica Policy Research.
    16. Lorena Alcázar & María Balarin & Karen Espinoza, 2016. "Impacts of the Peruvian Conditional Cash Transfer Program on Women’s Empowerment: A Quantitative and Qualitative Approach," Working Papers PMMA 2016-25, PEP-PMMA.
    17. Tiwari, Smriti, 2017. "Does Local Development Influence Outmigration Decisions? Evidence from Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 108-124.
    18. Sara Wong, 2017. "Minimum wage impacts on wages and hours worked of low-income workers in Ecuador," Working Papers PMMA 2017-14, PEP-PMMA.
    19. Глущенко К. П., 2012. "Оценка эффективности транспортных проектов: опыт и проблемы (часть 2). Transport project appraisal: experience and problems (part 2)," Мир экономики и управления // Вестник НГУ. Cерия: Cоциально-экономические науки, Socionet;Новосибирский государственный университет, vol. 12(1), pages 40-46.
    20. Mwale, Martin Limbikani & Chirwa, Gowokani Chijere & Mchenga, Martina & Zabula, Tayamika Kamwanja, 2021. "Micro-finance and women’s perception of domestic violence in a fragile state," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nccc26:409062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.