IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ncarar/259513.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade and Efficiency Effects of Domestic Content Protection The Australian Tobacco and Cigarette Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Beghin, John C.
  • Knox Lovell, G. A.

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical investigation of the international trade and domestic market efficiency effects of physical domestic content requirement in the Australian tobacco leaf growing and cigarette manufacturing industries. Our empirical evidence suggests. that the content requirement has distorted trade by restricting leaf imports. Nevertheless, the data are also consistent with the efficient contract hypothesis. The mix of domestic to imported leaf used in cigarette manufacturing depends on domestic leaf production costs and on world leaf prices but not on the negotiated domestic leaf price.

Suggested Citation

  • Beghin, John C. & Knox Lovell, G. A., 1991. "Trade and Efficiency Effects of Domestic Content Protection The Australian Tobacco and Cigarette Industries," Archive 259513, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ncarar:259513
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.259513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/259513/files/magr-northcarolinastate-043.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.259513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael L. Mussa, 1984. "The Economics of Content Protection," NBER Working Papers 1457, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Nash, John, 1953. "Two-Person Cooperative Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 21(1), pages 128-140, April.
    3. Beghin, John C. & Sumner, Daniel A., 1990. "Content Requirements with Bilateral Monopoly," Department of Economics and Business - Archive 259453, North Carolina State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Gene M. Grossman, 1981. "The Theory of Domestic Content Protection and Content Preference," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 96(4), pages 583-603.
    5. Thomson, William, 1987. "Monotonicity of bargaining solutions with respect to the disagreement point," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 50-58, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie-A-Joen, C. & Belderbos, R.A. & Sleuwaegen, L., 1998. "Local content requirements, vertical cooperation, and foreign direct investment," Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Netherlands Institute of Business Organization and Strategy Research (NIBOR).
    2. Kala Krishna & Anne Krueger, 1995. "Implementing Free Trade Areas: Rules of Origin and Hidden Protection," NBER Working Papers 4983, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. John C. Beghin & A. Blake Brown & M. Hasyim Zaini, 1997. "Impact of domestic content requirement on the US tobacco and cigarette industries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 201-212, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beghin, John C. & Sumner, Daniel A., 1991. "A Game-Theoretic Analysis Of The Australian ~ Tobacco Domestic Content Policy," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271257, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Beghin, John C. & Sumner, Daniel A., 1990. "Content Requirements with Bilateral Monopoly," Department of Economics and Business - Archive 259453, North Carolina State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Beghin, John & Knox Lovell, C.A., 1991. "Testing Trade and Efficiency Effects of Domestic Content in the Australian Tobacco and Cigarette Industries," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321436, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Eric van Damme & Xu Lang, 2022. "Two-Person Bargaining when the Disagreement Point is Private Information," Papers 2211.06830, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    5. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2022. "Pre-bargaining Investment Implies a Pareto Ranking of Bargaining Solutions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 769-787, August.
    6. Takacs, Wendy E., 1992. "How import protection affects the Philippines'motor vehicle industry," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1035, The World Bank.
    7. Douven, R.C.M.H. & Engwerda, J.C., 1995. "Properties of N-person axiomatic bargaining solutions if the Pareto frontier is twice differentiable and strictly concave," Other publications TiSEM ef77e675-1d26-4a70-abff-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Nejat Anbarci & Nick Feltovich, 2013. "How responsive are people to changes in their bargaining position? Earned bargaining power and the 50–50 norm," EcoMod2013 5855, EcoMod.
    9. Bekkali, Mukhtar & Beghin, John C., 2005. "Economics of Domestic Cultural Content Protection in Broadcasting, The," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12476, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Nejat Anbarci & Nick Feltovich, 2013. "How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 16(4), pages 560-596, December.
    11. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:6:y:2004:i:24:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Beghin, John C. & Blake Brown, A. & Hasyim Zaini, M., 1997. "Impact of domestic content requirement on the US tobacco and cigarette industries," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 201-212, January.
    13. Productivity Commission, 2004. "Rules of Origin under the Australia–New Zealand CER Trade Agreement," International Trade 0410001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Kala Krishna & Motoshige Itoh, 1988. "Content Protection and Oligopolistic Interactions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 55(1), pages 107-125.
    15. Rod Falvey & Geoff Reed, 1998. "Economic effects of rules of origin," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 134(2), pages 209-229, June.
    16. Kala Krishna & Anne Krueger, 1995. "Implementing Free Trade Areas: Rules of Origin and Hidden Protection," NBER Working Papers 4983, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Takacs, Wendy E., 1991. "The high cost of protecting Uruguay's automotive industry," Policy Research Working Paper Series 639, The World Bank.
    18. Safadi, Raed & Laird, Sam, 1996. "The Uruguay Round agreements: Impact on developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 1223-1242, July.
    19. Jie-A-Joen, C. & Belderbos, R.A. & Sleuwaegen, L., 1998. "Local content requirements, vertical cooperation, and foreign direct investment," Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Netherlands Institute of Business Organization and Strategy Research (NIBOR).
    20. Douven, R.C.M.H., 1995. "Policy coordination and convergence in the EU," Other publications TiSEM d4354b51-1c72-4109-9bde-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    21. Beghin, John C., 1988. "Towards a Theoretical Framework for Policy Behavioral Equations," Department of Economics and Business - Archive 259443, North Carolina State University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ncarar:259513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ag-econ.ncsu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.