IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi14/199341.html

Assessing the Supply Chain Governance Scenario in the Agri-food Sector: Development of a Measurement Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Rota, Cosimo
  • Zanasi, Cesare
  • Reynolds, Nikolai

Abstract

Defining a supply chain governance structure able to adapt to the supply chain technical and organizational characteristics positively influences the relationships between the agents and its overall competitiveness. The present study proposes a tool for the evaluation of the impact on the supply chain governance structure resulting from the adoption of sustainability improvement options in the area of organization and management in the agri-food sector. Two different approaches, proposed by (Gereffi et al., 2005) and (Hobbs and Young, 2000) are merged to provide a theoretical framework supporting the tool implementation. Gereffi et al., suggest that supply chains fall into one of five different governance structures, depending on the relative levels of three dimension: complexity of transaction, ability to codify and capabilities in the supply-base. Hobbs and Young link the product characteristics, regulatory and technology aspects to a change in supply chain vertical coordination. The parameters linking the sustainability improvement options to the change in the supply chain governance structure should result by interviewing a panel of experts, considering the difficulty to generalize the influence of the improvement options in different food chains contexts. This difficulty seems to be, to date, the main methodological limitation to the tool application. However, its represent a first step towards the assessment of the existing governance structure and its management.

Suggested Citation

  • Rota, Cosimo & Zanasi, Cesare & Reynolds, Nikolai, 2014. "Assessing the Supply Chain Governance Scenario in the Agri-food Sector: Development of a Measurement Tool," 2014 International European Forum, February 17-21, 2014, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 199341, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi14:199341
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.199341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/199341/files/13-Rota-Zanasi-Reynolds.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.199341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williamson, Oliver E., 1999. "The Mechanisms of Governance," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195132601.
    2. Lumineau, Fabrice & Henderson, James, 2012. "The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer-supplier disputes," MPRA Paper 38510, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Vlajic, Jelena V. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Haijema, René, 2012. "A framework for designing robust food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 176-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rota, Cosimo & Zanasi, Cesare & Reynolds, Nikolai, 2014. "Assessing the Impact of Sustainability Improvement Options on the Agri-food Supply Chain Governance Structures: Development of an Evaluation Tool," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 5(3), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Belhadi, Amine & Kamble, Sachin S. & Mani, Venkatesh & Venkatesh, V.G. & Shi, Yangyan, 2021. "Behavioral mechanisms influencing sustainable supply chain governance decision-making from a dyadic buyer-supplier perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Duplat, Valérie & Coeurderoy, Régis & Hagedoorn, John, 2018. "Contractual governance and the choice of dispute-resolution mechanisms: Evidence on technology licensing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1096-1110.
    4. Kumar, Anish & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kumar, Pradeep & Song, Malin, 2021. "Mitigate risks in perishable food supply chains: Learning from COVID-19," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    5. Cannavale, Chiara & Esempio, Anna & Ferretti, Marco, 2021. "Up- and down- alliances: A systematic literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    6. Darko, Deborah & Zhu, Demi & Quayson, Matthew & Hossin, Md Altab & Omoruyi, Osayuwamen & Bediako, Albert Kweku, 2023. "A multicriteria decision framework for governance of PPP projects towards sustainable development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    7. Ahmad Zia Wahdat & Jayson L. Lusk, 2023. "The Achilles heel of the U.S. food industries: Exposure to labor and upstream industries in the supply chain," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(2), pages 624-643, March.
    8. Fang, F., 2019. "When performance shortfall arises, contract or trust? A multi-method study of the impact of contractual and relational governances on performance in public – private partnerships," Other publications TiSEM 473840ee-6945-4a93-9326-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe & Lim, Yun Fong, 2017. "Optimizing (s, S) policies for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 880-892.
    10. Maria Ripollés & Andreu Blesa, 2020. "And yet, non-equity cooperative entries do improve international performance: uncovering the role of networks’ social capital," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 761-776, October.
    11. Hai, Do Phu & Roig-Dobón, Salvador & Sánchez-García, José Luis, 2016. "Innovative governance from public policy unities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1524-1528.
    12. Jonathon Mackay & Matthew Pepper & Albert Munoz, 2023. "Disruptions, systems and individual agents—Exploring the intersections," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 43-60, January.
    13. Mengyuan Cheng & Guoliang Liu & Yongshun Xu & Ming Chi, 2021. "Enhancing Trust Between PPP Partners: The Role of Contractual Functions and Information Transparency," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    14. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    15. Muhammad Junaid & Ye Xue & Muzzammil Wasim Syed & Ji Zu Li & Muhammad Ziaullah, 2019. "A Neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment in Automotive Industry of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Rodolfo Apreda, 2011. "GOVERNANCE RISKS. How to measure them by means of the incremental cash-flow model," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 467, Universidad del CEMA.
    17. Slangen, Louis H.G. & van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Suchanek, Pavel, 2002. "Institutions of sustainability in Central and Eastern European Countries," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24797, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. David Raba & Rafael D. Tordecilla & Pedro Copado & Angel A. Juan & Daniel Mount, 2022. "A Digital Twin for Decision Making on Livestock Feeding," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 267-282, May.
    19. Matteo De Marchi & Fanny Friedrich & Michael Riedl & Hartmut Zadek & Erwin Rauch, 2023. "Development of a Resilience Assessment Model for Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Geert Bouckaert & Wouter van Dooren & Bram Verschuere & Joris Voets & Ellen Wayenberg, 2002. "Trajectories for Modernizing Local Governance: Revisiting the Flanders Case," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 309-342, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi14:199341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.