IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/277377.html

Productivity-Enhancing Reallocation and Capital Structure of Downstream Markets - Empirical Evidence from the European Sugar Market

Author

Listed:
  • Wimmer, S.
  • Sauer, J.

Abstract

This article is concerned with the measurement of productivity and profitability in sugar beet farming. Following the 2006 announcement to abolish the EU sugar quota in 2017, a reallocation of beet production has been observed. We empirically test to what extent the reallocation contributed to productivity growth in the sector using German farm accountancy data. We find that the importance of productivity differences across farms in determining resource allocation is low, but the relative importance compared to profitability differences has been increased after the announcement. The results further indicate that reallocation is hampered by the capital structure of the sugar factories: the contribution of resource reallocation towards sector productivity growth is larger in catchment areas of private sugar companies compared to companies that are owned by farmers who hold secure delivery rights. Acknowledgement :

Suggested Citation

  • Wimmer, S. & Sauer, J., 2018. "Productivity-Enhancing Reallocation and Capital Structure of Downstream Markets - Empirical Evidence from the European Sugar Market," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277377, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277377
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277377/files/1888.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeroen Buysse & Bruno Fernagut & Olivier Harmignie & Bruno Henry de Frahan & Ludwig Lauwers & Philippe Polomé & Guido Van Huylenbroeck & Jef Van Meensel, 2007. "Farm-based modelling of the EU sugar reform: impact on Belgian sugar beet suppliers," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 34(1), pages 21-52, March.
    2. Eslava, Marcela & Haltiwanger, John & Kugler, Adriana & Kugler, Maurice, 2004. "The effects of structural reforms on productivity and profitability enhancing reallocation: evidence from Colombia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 333-371, December.
    3. Marc J. Melitz & Sašo Polanec, 2015. "Dynamic Olley-Pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(2), pages 362-375, June.
    4. Shingo Kimura & Johannes Sauer, 2015. "Dynamics of Dairy Farm Productivity in Estonia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 14(3), pages 26-27, December.
    5. Alison Burrell & Mihaly Himics & Benjamin Van Doorslaer & Pavel Ciaian & Shailesh Shrestha, 2014. "EU sugar policy: A sweet transition after 2015 ?," JRC Research Reports JRC76619, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Eslava, Marcela & Haltiwanger, John & Kugler, Adriana & Kugler, Maurice, 2004. "The effects of structural reforms on productivity and profitabality enhancing reallocation: evidence from Colombia," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0408, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    7. Allan Collard-Wexler & Jan De Loecker, 2015. "Reallocation and Technology: Evidence from the US Steel Industry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 131-171, January.
    8. Jan De Loecker, 2011. "Product Differentiation, Multiproduct Firms, and Estimating the Impact of Trade Liberalization on Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1407-1451, September.
    9. Richard E. Just & David Zilberman & Eithan Hochman & Ziv Bar-Shira, 1990. "Input Allocation in Multicrop Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(1), pages 200-209.
    10. repec:bge:wpaper:134 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Lucia Foster & John Haltiwanger & Chad Syverson, 2008. "Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(1), pages 394-425, March.
    12. Bruno Henry de Frahan & Alexandre Baudry & Rembert De Blander & Philippe Polomé & Richard Howitt, 2011. "Dairy farms without quotas in Belgium: estimation and simulation with a flexible cost function," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 38(4), pages 469-495, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Wimmer & Johannes Sauer, 2020. "Profitability Development and Resource Reallocation: The Case of Sugar Beet Farming in Germany," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 816-837, September.
    2. Jan De Loecker & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2016. "Effect of International Competition on Firm Productivity and Market Power," NBER Working Papers 21994, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Giannis Karagiannis & Magnus Kellermann & Klaus Salhofer, 2019. "Sources of Labor Productivity Growth in the German Brewing Industry," Working Papers 722019, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    4. Linarello, Andrea, 2018. "Direct and indirect effects of trade liberalization: Evidence from Chile," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 160-175.
    5. Andrea Linarello, 2014. "Trade liberalization and domestic suppliers: evidence from Chile," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 994, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    6. Karagiannis, Giannis & Kellermann, Magnus & Salhofer, Klaus, 2019. "Sources of Labor Productivity Growth in the German Brewing Industry," Discussion Papers DP-72-2019, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    7. Bie, Xiaodong & Ciani, Andrea, 2021. "Born similar, develop apart: Evidence on Chinese hybrid exporters," DICE Discussion Papers 364, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    8. Richard Bräuer & Matthias Mertens & Viktor Slavtchev, 2023. "Import competition and firm productivity: Evidence from German manufacturing," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 2285-2305, August.
    9. Marcela Eslava & John Haltiwanger & Adriana Kugler & Maurice Kugler, 2013. "Trade and Market Selection: Evidence from Manufacturing Plants in Colombia," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 16(1), pages 135-158, January.
    10. Maurice Kugler & Eric Verhoogen, 2012. "Prices, Plant Size, and Product Quality," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 79(1), pages 307-339.
    11. Maria Bas & Caroline Paunov, 2019. "What gains and distributional implications result from trade liberalization," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 19003, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    12. Rosario Crinò & Paolo Epifani, 2009. "Productivity, Quality and Export Behavior (Revised version of: Firm-Export Intensity and Productivity, September 2011)," Development Working Papers 271, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    13. Izak Atiyas, 2011. "Firm Level Data in The ERF Region: Research Questions, Data Requirements and Possibilities," Working Papers 589, Economic Research Forum, revised 06 Jan 2011.
    14. Maurice Kugler & Eric Verhoogen, 2008. "The Quality-Complementarity Hypothesis: Theory and New Evidence from Colombia," CID Working Papers 183, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    15. Dobbelaere, Sabien & Kiyota, Kozo & Mairesse, Jacques, 2015. "Product and labor market imperfections and scale economies: Micro-evidence on France, Japan and the Netherlands," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 290-322.
    16. Kılınç, Umut, 2014. "Estimating entrants' productivity when prices are unobserved," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 640-647.
    17. Demidova, Svetlana & Kee, Hiau Looi & Krishna, Kala, 2012. "Do trade policy differences induce sorting? Theory and evidence from Bangladeshi apparel exporters," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 247-261.
    18. Emmanuel Dhyne & Amil Petrin & Valerie Smeets & Frederic Warzynski, 2014. "Import competition, productivity and multi-product firms," Working Paper Research 268, National Bank of Belgium.
    19. Smeets, Valerie & Warzynski, Frederic, 2013. "Estimating productivity with multi-product firms, pricing heterogeneity and the role of international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 237-244.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.