IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi21/317047.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Farm supply and grain elevator businesses in a changing business environment: A mixed methods investigation of past and future strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Spahn, Laurin
  • Höhler, Julia

Abstract

Structural change in agriculture and competitive pressure transform the business environment of farm supply and grain elevator businesses. Strategies are an important tool for gaining or maintaining competitive advantages in this situation. Possible strategies include increasing diversification or the realization of economies of scale through growth. However, the analysis of strategies poses challenges as they often develop over time and contain both deliberate and non-deliberate elements. In a mixed methods approach, we combine a media analysis with a manager survey (n=62) to investigate past and future strategies of agricultural traders in Germany. We show that cooperation, diversification and autonomous growth were among the most popular strategic actions in the past 10 years and, according to the surveyed managers, will be in the future. The majority expect to offer more digital and consulting services in the future. This study provides new insights into agricultural traders’ realized and intended strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Spahn, Laurin & Höhler, Julia, 2021. "Farm supply and grain elevator businesses in a changing business environment: A mixed methods investigation of past and future strategies," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317047, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi21:317047
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.317047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/317047/files/111-H%C3%B6hler_b.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.317047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gollisch, Simon & Hedderich, Barbara & Theuvsenb, Ludwig, 2018. "Strategic Preferences of Farm Supply and Grain Elevator Businesses: Empirical Evidence from Germany," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(1), January.
    2. Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Pertusa-Ortega, Eva M. & Molina-Azorín, José F., 2012. "Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: Implications for performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 993-1002.
    3. Batte, Marvin T. & Ernst, Stan, 2007. "Net Gains from 'Net Purchases? Farmers’ Preferences for Online and Local Input Purchases," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 84-94, April.
    4. Kenneth F. Harling & Thomas F. Funk, 1987. "Competitive Strategy for Farm Supply and Grain Elevator Business," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(5), pages 1047-1055.
    5. Batte, Marvin T. & Ernst, Stanley C., 2007. "Net Gains from 'Net Purchases? Farmers' Preferences for Online and Local Input Purchases," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Fecke, Wilm & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "E-commerce in agriculture: The case of crop protection product purchases in a discrete choice experiment," DARE Discussion Papers 1803, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    7. Schulze, Birgit, 2012. "Herausforderungen Des Landhandels Unter Veränderten Marktbedingungen: Theoretische Überlegungen Und Empirische Evidenz," 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 133053, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fecke, Wilm & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "E-commerce in agriculture: The case of crop protection product purchases in a discrete choice experiment," DARE Discussion Papers 1803, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Mishra, Ashok K. & Williams, Robert P. & Detre, Joshua D., 2009. "Internet Access and Internet Purchasing Patterns of Farm Households," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Spaulding, Aslihan D. & Tudor, Kerry W. & Mahatanankoon, Pruthikrai, 2015. "The Effects of Outcome Expectations on Individual’s Anxiety and Continued Usage of Mobile Devices: A Post-Adoption Study," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Simon Gollisch & Barbara Hedderich & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2016. "Reference points and risky decision-making in agricultural trade firms: A case study in Germany," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260773, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    5. Zapata, Samuel D. & Isengildina-Massa, Olga & Carpio, Carlos E. & Lamie, R. David, 2016. "Does E-Commerce Help Farmers’ Markets? Measuring the Impact of MarketMaker," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(2), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Gollisch, Simon & Hedderich, Barbara & Theuvsenb, Ludwig, 2018. "Strategic Preferences of Farm Supply and Grain Elevator Businesses: Empirical Evidence from Germany," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(1), January.
    7. Fecke, Wilm & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "Online-Einkauf von Pflanzenschutzmitteln: Ein Discrete Choice Experiment mit landwirtschaftlichen Unternehmern in Deutschland," DARE Discussion Papers 1811, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    8. Gollisch, Simon & Hedderich, Barbara & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "Reference points and risky decision-making in agricultural trade firms: A case study in Germany," DARE Discussion Papers 1609, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    9. Zapata, Samuel D. & Carpio, Carlos E. & Isengildina-Massa, Olga & Lamie, R. David, 2013. "The Economic Impact of Services Provided by an Electronic Trade Platform: The Case of MarketMaker," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-20.
    10. Alhamzah Alnoor & Khai Wah Khaw & XinYing Chew & Sammar Abbas & Zeeshan Zaib Khattak, 2023. "The Influence of the Barriers of Hybrid Strategy on Strategic Competitive Priorities: Evidence from Oil Companies," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 179-198, June.
    11. Tajana Čop & Mario Njavro, 2022. "Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Agricultural Risk Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Yi Liu & Wenqian Li & Yuan Li, 2020. "Ambidexterity between low cost strategy and CSR strategy: contingencies of competition and regulation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 633-660, September.
    13. Zhani, Najlae & Mouri, Nacef & Ahmed, Tariq, 2022. "The role of mobile value and trust as drivers of purchase intentions in m-servicescape," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Rogerio Morais & José Dirnece Tavares Paes, 2020. "Analysis Of Factors Supporting Swot In Organizational Strategic Planning," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 48(2), pages 38-51.
    15. Elisa Giampietri & Samuele Trestini, 2020. "Analysing farmers' intention to adopt web marketing under a technology-organisation-environment perspective: A case study in Italy," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(5), pages 226-233.
    16. Kawai, Norifumi & Strange, Roger, 2014. "Subsidiary autonomy and performance in Japanese multinationals in Europe," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 504-515.
    17. Barbara Kożuch & Adam Jabłoński, 2018. "The Strategic Hybrids of Water Supply Companies as an Effective Management Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-43, November.
    18. Wu, Jih-Hwa & Cheng, Chih-Ming & Cheng, Po-Jen, 2015. "Behavioral intention toward urban eco-land performance assessment models using TPB tests," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 771-776.
    19. Evin Özkan & Neda Azizi & Omid Haass, 2021. "Leveraging Smart Contract in Project Procurement through DLT to Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Ana Ramalho Ribeiro & Billy Goodburn & Luis Mayor & Line F. Lindner & Christoph F. Knöbl & Jacques Trienekens & Daniel Rossi & Francesca Sanna & Remigio Berruto & Patrizia Busato, 2023. "Skill Needs for Sustainable Agri-Food and Forestry Sectors (II): Insights of a European Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi21:317047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.