IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae08/44067.html

Relationships' sustainability: the case of German wheat-to-bread chain

Author

Listed:
  • Bavorova, Miroslava
  • Hockmann, Heinrich

Abstract

In recent years there has been a shift in emphasis from transaction-based to more co-operative relationships, as chain members have recognised the need to invest in their supply chain relationships in order to protect their businesses. These non-arm’s-length relationships are capable of generating relational rents for chain partners. The main aim of this paper is to investigate why, in spite of the advantages of the non-arm’s-length relationships, some relationships do not continue. To enhance the understanding of the termination process, we identify and analyse the factors inducing relationship sustainability (continuation) as well as termination in the case of the German wheat-to-bread chain. The study built on the findings of relationship marketing approach that stresses the importance of building longer-term relationships with customers rather than carrying out individual transactions. In addition, the findings of modern microeconomic theories including transaction costs theory and industrial theory are taken into consideration. The empirical analysis is based on two data sets: First, a quantitative questionnaire survey and second, interviews with stakeholders of the wheat-to-bread chain were conducted, aiming at identifying the role of economic and behavioral dimensions of relationships for their termination. The questionnaire survey provides that businesses assess the relationships in the wheat-to-bread chain, being of high quality and long term duration. The results show that trust, satisfaction and commitment - the behavioural dimensions of relationships quality - are very high in the considered chain. Competitive price, competitive quality and supply continuity were identified as determinants mostly important for buyers’ satisfaction as directly influencing relationships’ performance. In addition, the results demonstrate that lack of trust is the reason why relationships do not develop or are terminated in the early phases of the relationship. In the long lasting relationships on the other hand, the reasons for termination are mostly of economic nature. The paper shows why sustainable relationships may enhance business’ competitiveness and analyses why in spite of it the relationships terminate. As the result of the research we understand the sustainable relationships as those relationships in that the costs for starting the relationship are exceeded by returns gained from the cooperation in time.

Suggested Citation

  • Bavorova, Miroslava & Hockmann, Heinrich, 2008. "Relationships' sustainability: the case of German wheat-to-bread chain," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44067, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:44067
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.44067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/44067/files/313.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.44067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandy D. Jap & Erin Anderson, 2007. "Testing a Life-Cycle Theory of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships: Movement Across Stages and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 260-275, February.
    2. Bejou, David & Wray, Barry & Ingram, Thomas N., 1996. "Determinants of relationship quality: An artificial neural network analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 137-143, June.
    3. Kallfass, Herrmann H, 1993. "Kostenvorteile durch vertikale Integration im Agrarsektor," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 42(06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Chuang & Du, Nan & Zhang, Xubing, 2021. "When an interfirm relationship is ending: The dark side of managerial ties and relationship intimacy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 227-238.
    2. Wittaya Pornpatcharapong & Chuvej Chansa-ngavej & Supachok Wiriyacosol & Chanchai Bunchapattanasakda, 2011. "The Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Prioritize Impact Factors Affecting Thai Rural Village Development," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 2(2), pages 89-93.
    3. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    4. Amy H. I. Lee & He-Yau Kang & Yu-Ai Liu, 2021. "A Pilot Study on the Satisfaction of Long-Term Care Services in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Khan, Zaheer & Nicholson, John D., 2014. "An investigation of the cross-border supplier development process: Problems and implications in an emerging economy," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1212-1222.
    6. Gatignon, Aline & Gatignon, Hubert, 2010. "Erin Anderson and the Path Breaking Work of TCE in New Areas of Business Research: Transaction Costs in Action," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 232-247.
    7. Girgzdiene, Vilija & Hartmann, Monika & Kuodys, Arvydas & Vaikutis, Viktoras & Wandel, Jurgen, 1999. "Industrial Organisation Of The Food Industry In Lithuania: Results Of An Expert Survey In The Dairy And Sugar Branch," IAMO Discussion Papers 14904, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    8. imen ABDENNADHER & Karim TRABELSI & Tarek ABDELLATIF, 2017. "Les influences des déterminants de la qualité relationnelle des banques islamiques sur l’engagement de leurs clients," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 8(1), June.
    9. , Le Thanh Tung, 2024. "Impact of relationship quality on customer loyalty: A study in the banking system," OSF Preprints qzpxk, Center for Open Science.
    10. Hani, Umme & Akter, Shahriar & Wickramasinghe, Ananda & Kattiyapornpong, Uraiporn, 2021. "How does relationship quality sustain the rich world’s poorest businesses?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 297-308.
    11. Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Leat, Philip M.K. & Renwick, Alan W. & Lamprinopoulou-Kranis, Chrysa, "undated". "Innovation and Power in Food Supply Chains: The Case of the Potato Sector in the UK," 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic 135776, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. repec:osf:osfxxx:qzpxk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Wagner, Stephan M., 2011. "Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 277-283, February.
    14. Kam, Booi H. & Lai, Manh Khang, 2018. "Buyer-supplier exchange relationship: How do exchange partners behave across the relationship life-cycle?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 239-257.
    15. Nagel, Duane M. & Giunipero, Larry & Jung, Hyeyoon & Salas, Jim & Hochstein, Bryan, 2021. "Purchaser perceptions of early phase supplier relationships: The role of similarity and likeability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 174-186.
    16. Hartmann, Monika, 2001. "The Dairy Sector in the Central European Candidate (CEC) Countries - The Status of Restructuring and Future Challenges," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(6), pages 342-353.
    17. Ojansivu, Ilkka & Laari-Salmela, Sari & Hermes, Jan, 2022. "The social impact of the Nokia-Elcoteq business relationship: Examining the consequences of legitimating relationship norms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 193-206.
    18. Bettencourt, Lance A. & Blocker, Christopher P. & Houston, Mark B. & Flint, Daniel J., 2015. "Rethinking customer relationships," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 99-108.
    19. Carmen Lages & Cristiana Raquel Lages & Luis Filipe Lages, 2004. "The relqual scale: a measure of relationship quality in export market ventures," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp447, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    20. Bove, Liliana L. & Johnson, Lester W., 2001. "Customer relationships with service personnel: do we measure closeness, quality or strength?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 189-197, December.
    21. Klimas, Patrycja & Kawa, Arkadiusz & Sachpazidu, Karina & Stańczyk, Sylwia & Brenk, Katharina & Kanbach, Dominik K., 2025. "Decoding coopetition performance using impactful coopetition attributes: Evidence from manufacturing companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:44067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.