IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare02/125049.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Hedonic Price Analysis of Quality Characteristics of Chickpea in India

Author

Listed:
  • Agbola, Frank W.
  • Kelley, Timothy G.
  • Bent, Martin J.M.
  • Rao, Partha P.

Abstract

This paper examines consumer attitudes to quality characteristics of chickpea in India. A linear hedonic price functional form was estimated using price and quality data of 52 kabuli chickpea and 128 desi-type chickpea samples obtained from major chickpea markets in India. Empirical results indicate that physical quality characteristics and purity standards are important factors influencing consumption decisions in the Indian chickpea market. The chemical quality characteristics have been found to be unimportant in influencing consumption decisions due to their cryptic nature. The implicit values of the physical quality characteristics and purity standards are reported. The results demonstrate that there is an incentive for breeders, producers and exporters to improve the quality characteristics of chickpea export because consumers in India discriminate between chickpea varieties based on their physical characteristics and purity standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Agbola, Frank W. & Kelley, Timothy G. & Bent, Martin J.M. & Rao, Partha P., 2002. "A Hedonic Price Analysis of Quality Characteristics of Chickpea in India," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125049, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare02:125049
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.125049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/125049/files/Agbola1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.125049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agbola, Frank W. & Bent, Martin J.M. & Kelley, Timothy G. & Rao, P. Parthasarathy, 2000. "Factors Influencing The Demand For Chickpea In India: Implications For Marketing And Promotion In The Indian Chickpea Market," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123593, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Thomas I. Wahl & Hongqi Shi & Ron C. Mittelhammer, 1995. "A hedonic price analysis of quality characteristics of Japanese wagyu beef," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(1), pages 35-44.
    3. Samikwa, Duncan D. & Brorsen, B. Wade & Sanders, Larry D., 1998. "Hedonic Prices Of Malawi Burley Tobacco," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11.
    4. Michele M. Veeman, 1987. "Hedonic Price Functions for Wheat in the World Market: Implications for Canadian Wheat Export Strategy," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 35(3), pages 535-552, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaretha Rudstrom, 2004. "Determining Implicit Prices for Hay Quality and Bale Characteristics," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(4), pages 552-562.
    2. Toshihiro Okubo, 2013. "Energy-saving regulations and commodity prices," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 15(1), pages 93-132, January.
    3. Agbola, Frank W. & Kelley, Timothy G. & Bent, Martin J.M. & Rao, P. Parthasarathy, 2002. "Eliciting And Valuing Market Preferences With Traditional Food Crops: The Case Of Chickpea In India," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15.
    4. Farrell, Terence C. & Hopkins, David L., 2007. "A hedonic Model of Lamb Carcass Attributes," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 15.
    5. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z. & Stanmore, Roland G., 1994. "Quality Premiums For Australian Wheat In The Growing Asian Markets," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 38(3), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Heng-Hung KUO & Li-Hsing HO & Wen-Hung LIN, 2015. "Do hog breeds matter? Investigating the price volatility in the Taiwan's auction market," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(7), pages 314-325.
    7. Singh-Knights, Doolarie & Smith, Dennis K. & Knights, Marlon, 2005. "A Hedonic Analysis of Sheep and Goat Prices in a Changing Environment: The Role of Consumers and Implications for Management," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19289, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Diersen, Matthew A. & Wilson, William W. & Johnson, D. Demcey, 1995. "Quality Uncertainty and Grain Merchandising Risk: Vomitoxin in Spring Wheat," Agricultural Economics Reports 23365, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    9. Richards, Timothy J. & Jeffrey, Scott R., 1995. "Hedonic Pricing of Dairy Bulls - An Alternative Index of Genetic Merit," Project Report Series 24035, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    10. Daniel H. Pick & Timothy A. Park, 1991. "The Competitive Structure of U.S. Agricultural Exports," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(1), pages 133-141.
    11. Dahl, Bruce L. & Wilson, William W., 1996. "Grades/Classes Of Hard Wheats Exported From North America: Analysis Of Demand And Trends," Agricultural Economics Reports 23379, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    12. Estes, Edmund A. & Smith, V. Kerry, 1996. "Price, Quality, And Pesticide Related Health Risk Considerations In Fruit And Vegetable Purchases: An Hedonic Analysis Of Tucson, Arizona Supermarkets," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(3), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Fredoun Z. Ahmadi-Esfahani & Roland G. Stanmore, 1994. "Values of Australian wheat and flour quality characteristics," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(6), pages 529-536.
    14. Chenhall, D. & Fraser, R.W. & Lloyd-Smith, J., 1990. "Beef Quality Preferences in Western Australia," Discussion Papers 232272, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    15. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z. & Stanmore, Roland G., 1997. "Export demand for attributes of Australian wheat in Asia and the Middle East," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 145-154, April.
    16. N. Koffi Amegbeto & Victor M. Manyong & Ousmane Coulibaly & Robert Asiedu, 2008. "Estimating market demand for fresh yam characteristics using contingent valuation: implications for crop breeding and production choices," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(3), pages 349-363, November.
    17. Hyberg, Bengt & Uri, Noel D. & Oliveira, Valencia, 1996. "The quality characteristics of Japanese soybean imports," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 81-98, March.
    18. Dahl, Bruce L. & Wilson, William W., 1999. "Effect Of Hard Red Spring Wheat Consistency On Milling Value," Agricultural Economics Reports 23378, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    19. Suleyman Karaman & Bahattin Cetin & Ayse Oguzlar & Koksal Yagdi, 2009. "Hedonic price estimation for the Turkish bread wheat characteristics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(6), pages 895-902, November.
    20. Jens‐Peter Loy & Thore Holm & Carsten Steinhagen & Thomas Glauben, 2015. "Seasonal Quality Premiums for Wheat: A Case Study for Northern Germany," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 63-75, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Demand and Price Analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare02:125049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.