IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Whole Truth in Herbicide Labelling


  • Nordblom, Thomas L.
  • Medd, Richard W.


The 1999 National Competition Policy Review of Ag & Vet Chemical legislation recommended, inter alia, that registrants no longer be required to prove ‘APPROPRIATE’ levels of efficacy of their products but only that the claims on product labels be ‘TRUE’. ‘Appropriate’ efficacy standards amount to market regulation, limiting economic competition from formulations with lower efficacies. Cheaper formulations with lower efficacies are excluded from the marketplace by such standards. Unanswered is the question of what ‘TRUTH’ on a label means in practical terms. Flexibility in dose rates and guidance with usage information is not always well-stated on herbicide labels. There is considerable evidence that efficacy of herbicide varies with dose and with environmental or growth conditions. Under favourable conditions at a given site, a low rate of herbicide will kill most of the target weeds. Under less favourable conditions at the same site, a high rate may be required. Labels could take variations in efficacy into account by indicating observed results for a range of environmental conditions at different dose rates. This is illustrated with examples of herbicide performance and analogies from another industry in which explicit performance information is absolutely required. This paper raises the question of reforms towards providing ‘the whole truth’ in herbicide labelling, to provide users with guidance on when they might adjust doses to specific environmental and growth conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nordblom, Thomas L. & Medd, Richard W., 2000. "Whole Truth in Herbicide Labelling," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123711, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare00:123711

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Pannell, David J., 1990. "An Economic Response Model Of Herbicide Application For Weed Control," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Bond, Gary E. & Wonder, Bernard, 1980. "Risk Attitudes Amongst Australian Farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Gary E. Bond & Bernard Wonder, 1980. "Risk Attitudes Amongst Australian Farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 24(1), pages 16-34, April.
    4. H. Talpaz & G. L. Curry & P. J. H. Sharpe & D. W. DeMichele & R. E. Frisbie, 1978. "Optimal Pesticide Application for Controlling the Boll Weevil on Cotton," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(3), pages 469-475.
    5. J. K. Rawat & K. L. Belli & S. M. Smith & J. C. Nautiyal, 1987. "A Pest and Timber Management Model: Jack Pine Budworm and Jack Pine," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 35(2), pages 441-461, July.
    6. Pannell, David J., 1989. "Economics and the Law Relating to Flexibility of Chemical Rates," Discussion Papers 230950, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Crop Production/Industries;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare00:123711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.