IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404726.html

State-Space Aggregation in Markov Chains and the Modeling of US Crop Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, T. Jake
  • Moschini, GianCarlo

Abstract

Crop rotation is a cornerstone of agricultural production, and Markov chains provide a powerful framework for modeling rotation practices. This paper examines the implications of state-space aggregation in Markov chain models of crop choices in the US Corn Belt. Using a multinomial logit model and over two decades of field-level data, we show that modeling crop choices with a two-state Markov process, where the states are corn and all other crops, leads to significant information loss compared to a three-state model that treats corn, soybeans, and other crops as separate states. We provide a theoretical statement of two distinct aggregation conditions for Markov chains, and discuss how these conditions can be maintained or tested in a multinomial logit parameterization of Markov transition probabilities. Structural tests strongly reject the parameter restrictions required for state-space aggregation. Relative to the three-state model, a two-state Markov chain model produces systematic differences in estimated covariate effects, Markov transition probabilities, and key crop area patterns. Furthermore, tracking soybeans separately from other crops reveals distinct regional trends in cropping patterns, including the widespread adoption of corn-soybean rotation in the recent expansion of corn cultivation in the western Corn Belt. These findings highlight the importance of state-space representation in Markov models and offer new insights into the dynamics of crop rotations in the Corn Belt.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, T. Jake & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2026. "State-Space Aggregation in Markov Chains and the Modeling of US Crop Patterns," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404726, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404726
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404726/files/177662_191675_115232_Aggregation_Markov_Rotations_-_AAEA_2026_Meeting.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colussi, Joana & Schnitkey, Gary & Janzen, Joe & Paulson, Nick, 2024. "The United States, Brazil, and China Soybean Triangle: A 20-Year Analysis," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 14(35).
    2. Moschini, GianCarlo & Cui, Jingbo & Lapan, Harvey E., . "Economics of Biofuels: An Overview of Policies, Impacts and Prospects," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 1(3), pages 1-28.
    3. GianCarlo Moschini & Harvey Lapan & Hyunseok Kim, 2017. "The Renewable Fuel Standard in Competitive Equilibrium: Market and Welfare Effects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1117-1142.
    4. GwanSeon Kim & Mehdi Nemati & Steven Buck & Nicholas Pates & Tyler Mark, 2020. "Recovering Forecast Distributions of Crop Composition: Method and Application to Kentucky Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Scott H. Irwin & Kristen McCormack & James H. Stock, 2020. "The Price of Biodiesel RINs and Economic Fundamentals," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 734-752, May.
    6. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W Imbens & Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2023. "When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(1), pages 1-35.
    7. Richard Blundell & Thomas M. Stoker, 2005. "Heterogeneity and Aggregation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 43(2), pages 347-391, June.
    8. Nathan P. Hendricks & Aaron Smith & Daniel A. Sumner, 2014. "Crop Supply Dynamics and the Illusion of Partial Adjustment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1469-1491.
    9. Declerck, Francis & Hikouatcha, Prince & Tchoffo, Guillaume & Tédongap, Roméo, 2023. "Biofuel policies and their ripple effects: An analysis of vegetable oil price dynamics and global consumer responses," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Hendricks, Nathan P. & Er, Emrah, 2018. "Changes in cropland area in the United States and the role of CRP," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 15-23.
    11. Fisher, Franklin M, 1969. "The Existence of Aggregate Production Functions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 553-577, October.
    12. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
    13. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    14. Nicholas J. Pates & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2021. "Fields from Afar: Evidence of Heterogeneity in United States Corn Rotational Response from Remote Sensing Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(5), pages 1759-1782, October.
    15. Wongpiyabovorn, Oranuch & Wang, Tong, 2024. "Revisiting Land Use Conversion Trends in the Margins of U.S. Corn Belt," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(4), November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathan P. Hendricks, 2022. "Would farmers benefit from removing more land from production in the next farm bill?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1139-1157, September.
    2. Hyunseok Kim & GianCarlo Moschini, 2018. "The Dynamics of Supply: U.S. Corn and Soybeans in the Biofuel Era," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 94(4), pages 593-613.
    3. Dilek Uz & Steven Buck & David Sunding, 2022. "Fixed or mixed? Farmer‐level heterogeneity in response to changes in salinity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1343-1363, August.
    4. Steven M. Ramsey & Jason S. Bergtold & Jessica L. Heier Stamm, 2021. "Field‐Level Land‐Use Adaptation to Local Weather Trends," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1314-1341, August.
    5. Zhihao Zheng & Yang Gao & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Yinyu Zhao, 2023. "Policy reform and farmers' coping strategies: The case of corn price shocks in Heilongjiang Province of China," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 1135-1156, May.
    6. Laura-Lucia Richter & Melvyn Weeks, 2016. "Flexible Mixed Logit with Posterior Analysis: Exploring Willingness-to-Pay for Grid Resilience," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1631, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Brown, Sarah & Greene, William H. & Harris, Mark N. & Taylor, Karl, 2015. "An inverse hyperbolic sine heteroskedastic latent class panel tobit model: An application to modelling charitable donations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 228-236.
    8. Hilger, Anne & Nordman, Christophe Jalil, 2020. "The Determinants of Trust: Evidence from Rural South India," IZA Discussion Papers 13150, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. R. R. Croes & Y. J. F. M. Krabbe-Alkemade & M. C. Mikkers, 2018. "Competition and quality indicators in the health care sector: empirical evidence from the Dutch hospital sector," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(1), pages 5-19, January.
    10. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2023. "What is a standard error? (And how should we compute it?)," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    11. Eva Boonaert & Charline Depoorter & Axel Marx & Miet Maertens, 2024. "Carrots rather than sticks: Governance of voluntary sustainability standards and farmer welfare in Peru," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6471-6492, December.
    12. Cappelletti, Matilde & Giuffrida, Leonardo M., 2022. "Targeted bidders in government tenders," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-030, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Mattia Girotti & Richard Meade, 2017. "U.S. Savings Banks' Demutualization and Depositor Welfare," Working Papers 2017-08, Auckland University of Technology, Department of Economics.
    14. Ruonan Xu & Luther Yap, 2024. "Clustering with Potential Multidimensionality: Inference and Practice," Papers 2411.13372, arXiv.org.
    15. Maness, Michael & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2016. "An indirect latent informational conformity social influence choice model: Formulation and case study," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 75-101.
    16. Angela S. Bergantino & Antonello Clemente & Stefano Iandolo & Riccardo Turati, 2025. "Shaped by Urban-Rural Divide and Skill: the Drivers of Internal Mobility in Italy," Working Papers wpdea2513, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    17. Suhiyini I., Alhassan & Joseph, Amikuzuno & Damba O., Tahidu, 2023. "Implications of participation in climate change interventions on food security: Evidence from farm households in Ghana," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365927, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    18. Florian Heiss, 2016. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 688-692, April.
    19. Leslie E. Papke & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2024. "A simple, robust test for choosing the level of fixed effects in linear panel data models," Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, in: Subal C. Kumbhakar & Robin C. Sickles & Hung-Jen Wang (ed.), Advances in Applied Econometrics, pages 219-237, Springer.
    20. Zemo, Kahsay Haile & Termansen, Mette, 2018. "Farmers’ willingness to participate in collective biogas investment: A discrete choice experiment study," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 87-101.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.