IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/360839.html

Functional Ingredients and Hypothetical Mergers Associated with the Energy Drink Market

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Lingxiao
  • Capps Jr., Oral
  • Zheng, Yuqing
  • Pan, Yuxuan

Abstract

Using NielsenIQ Retail Scanner data from 2021 to 2023, merged with the product-level ingredient data from Mintel Global New Products Database (GNPD), we estimate a Berry-Levinsohn-Pakes (BLP) model to evaluate consumers' revealed preferences for nutritional and functional ingredients concerning energy drinks. Results indicate that consumers have strong preferences for functional ingredients such as taurine, while showing aversion toward excessive sugar and certain mineral and chemical additives. Estimated price elasticities suggest that the demand for energy drink products is quite elastic, and generally are substitutes for one another, although some products within the same brand are complements. Simulations of three hypothetical mergers show that prices increase for both acquiring and acquired firms, profit declines for the acquired brands due to reduced market share, and consumer surplus largely decreases. The Difference-in-Difference (DID) event study of the actual Monster-Bang merger confirms similar directional effects on prices and market shares, though the magnitudes differ.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Lingxiao & Capps Jr., Oral & Zheng, Yuqing & Pan, Yuxuan, 2025. "Functional Ingredients and Hypothetical Mergers Associated with the Energy Drink Market," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360839, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360839
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.360839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360839/files/75219_94902_105300_EnergyDrinkforAAEA_06162025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.360839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    2. Chen, Xuan & Liu, Yizao & Jaenicke, Edward C. & Rabinowitz, Adam N., 2019. "New concerns on caffeine consumption and the impact of potential regulations: The case of energy drinks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Aleksandra Kowalska & Krzysztof Leoniak & Bartosz Grzegorz Sołowiej, 2024. "Consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward functional beverages: a lesson for producers and retailers," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 51(3), pages 321-337, September.
    4. Aviv Nevo, 2000. "Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 31(3), pages 395-421, Autumn.
    5. Haeck, Catherine & Lawson, Nicholas & Poirier, Krystel, 2022. "Estimating consumer preferences for different beverages using the BLP approach," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    6. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W Imbens & Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2023. "When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(1), pages 1-35.
    7. Capps, Oral, Jr. & Hanselman, Robin D., 2012. "A Pilot Study of the Market for Energy Drinks," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 43(3), November.
    8. Peters, Craig, 2006. "Evaluating the Performance of Merger Simulation: Evidence from the U.S. Airline Industry," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(2), pages 627-649, October.
    9. Chen Zhen & Eric A. Finkelstein & James M. Nonnemaker & Shawn A. Karns & Jessica E. Todd, 2014. "Predicting the Effects of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes on Food and Beverage Demand in a Large Demand System," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(1), pages 1-25.
    10. Jerry A. Hausman, 1996. "Valuation of New Goods under Perfect and Imperfect Competition," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of New Goods, pages 207-248, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Staples, Aaron J. & Kalaitzandonakes, Maria, 2025. "What’s the Buzz? Preferences and perceptions of policies to reduce childhood energy drink consumption," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Nathan H. Miller & Matthew C. Weinberg, 2017. "Understanding the Price Effects of the MillerCoors Joint Venture," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85(6), pages 1763-1791, November.
    13. Barney Warf, 2003. "Mergers and Acquisitions in the Telecommunications Industry," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 321-344, August.
    14. Berry, Steven & Levinsohn, James & Pakes, Ariel, 1995. "Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 841-890, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haeck, Catherine & Lawson, Nicholas & Poirier, Krystel, 2022. "Estimating consumer preferences for different beverages using the BLP approach," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    2. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2010. "The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 24(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    3. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Pires, Tiago & Trindade, Andre, 2018. "Measuring the Welfare of Intermediaries in Vertical Markets," MPRA Paper 90465, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Cazaubiel, Arthur & Cure, Morgane & Johansen, Bjørn Olav & Vergé, Thibaud, 2020. "Substitution between online distribution channels: Evidence from the Oslo hotel market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107069978, November.
    6. Ma, Meilin & Liu, Yunjuan, 2020. "Processor-Retailer Markup and Pricing Decision: Insights from the U.S. Beef Market 2011-16," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304350, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Javier Donna & Andre Trindade & Pedro Pereira & Tiago Pires, 2018. "Measuring the Welfare of Intermediation in Vertical Markets," 2018 Meeting Papers 984, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    8. , 2023. "Price Competition and Endogenous Product Choice in Networks: Evidence from the US airline Industry," Working Papers 950, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    9. Cazaubiel, Arthur & Cure, Morgane & Johansen, Bjørn Olav & Vergé, Thibaud, 2018. "Substitution Between Online Distribution Channels: Evidence from the Oslo Hotel Market," Working Papers in Economics 8/18, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    10. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Trindade, Andre & Yoshida, Renan C., 2020. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining," MPRA Paper 105773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Friberg, Richard & Romahn, André, 2015. "Divestiture requirements as a tool for competition policy: A case from the Swedish beer market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-18.
    12. Richard Schmalensee, 2012. "“On a Level with Dentists?” Reflections on the Evolution of Industrial Organization," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(3), pages 157-179, November.
    13. Ferrier, Peyton & Zhen, Chen, "undated". "Explaining the Shift from Preserved to Fresh Vegetable Consumption," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170555, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Charles J. Romeo, 2016. "Incorporating Prior Information into A GMM Objective For Mixed Logit Demand Systems," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 336-363, June.
    15. Gaurab Aryal & Anirban Chattopadhyaya & Federico Ciliberto, 2025. "Bridging Quasi-Experimental and Structural Approaches for Robust Evaluation of US Airline Mergers," Papers 2503.15785, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    16. repec:ags:aaea22:343858 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Verboven, Frank & Bourreau, Marc & Sun, Yutec, 2018. "Market Entry, Fighting Brands and Tacit Collusion: The Case of the French Mobile Telecommunications Market," CEPR Discussion Papers 12866, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Harold D. Chiang & Jack Collison & Lorenzo Magnolfi & Christopher Sullivan, 2025. "Enhancing the Merger Simulation Toolkit with ML/AI," Papers 2506.05225, arXiv.org.
    19. Afonso Rodrigues, 2025. "Consumer Choice Over Shopping Baskets: A Linear Demand Approach," Papers 2511.11846, arXiv.org.
    20. Mansley, Ryan & Miller, Nathan H. & Sheu, Gloria & Weinberg, Matthew C., 2023. "A price leadership model for merger analysis," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    21. Nathan H. Miller & Gloria Sheu, 2021. "Quantitative Methods for Evaluating the Unilateral Effects of Mergers," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 58(1), pages 143-177, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.