IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea23/335805.html

Examining Incentives for Landowners to use Preventative Measures Against Wildfires Through an Experimental Game

Author

Listed:
  • Collison, Kealey N.
  • Grogan, Kelly A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Collison, Kealey N. & Grogan, Kelly A., 2023. "Examining Incentives for Landowners to use Preventative Measures Against Wildfires Through an Experimental Game," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335805, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea23:335805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335805/files/26743.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayachandran, Seema & de Laat, Joost & Lambin, Eric F. & Stanton, Charlotte, 2016. "Cash for Carbon: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Deforestation," CEPR Discussion Papers 11349, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    2. Handberg, Øyvind Nystad & Angelsen, Arild, 2015. "Experimental tests of tropical forest conservation measures," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 346-359.
    3. Daniel L. Chen & Martin Schonger & Chris Wickens, 2016. "oTree - An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments," Post-Print hal-04315125, HAL.
    4. Handberg, Øyvind Nystad & Angelsen, Arild, 2019. "Pay little, get little; pay more, get a little more: A framed forest experiment in Tanzania," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 454-467.
    5. Krister P. Andersson & Nathan J. Cook & Tara Grillos & Maria Claudia Lopez & Carl F. Salk & Glenn D. Wright & Esther Mwangi, 2018. "Experimental evidence on payments for forest commons conservation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(3), pages 128-135, March.
    6. Chen, Daniel L. & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2016. "oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 88-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ags:aaea22:335805 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lauriane S. Yehouenou & Stephen N. Morgan & Kelly A. Grogan, 2023. "Management of Timber and Nontimber Forest Products: Evidence from a Framed Field Experiment in Benin, West Africa," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(2), pages 353-387.
    3. Marie Ferré & Stefanie Engel & Elisabeth Gsottbauer, 2023. "External validity of economic experiments on Agri‐environmental scheme design," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 661-685, September.
    4. Kanittha Tambunlertchai & Sittidaj Pongkijvorasin, 2020. "The impacts of collective threshold requirements for rewards in a CPR experiment," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(4), pages 537-554, October.
    5. Ngoma, Hambulo & Hailu, Amare Teklay & Kabwe, Stephen & Angelsen, Arild, 2020. "Pay, talk or ‘whip’ to conserve forests: Framed field experiments in Zambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Nyanghura, Qambemeda M. & Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa & Börner, Jan, 2024. "Incentives for biodiversity conservation under asymmetric land ownership," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    7. Grillos, Tara & Bottazzi, Patrick & Crespo, David & Asquith, Nigel & Jones, Julia P.G., 2019. "In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention: A randomized trial in Bolivia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Fallucchi, Francesco & Marietta Leina, Andrea & Quercia, Simone, 2026. "Validating a survey measure of conditional cooperation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Chen, Yefeng & Yang, Wenyuan & Luo, Gansong & Luo, Jun, 2024. "Choosing tournament for children: Parenting style and information intervention," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Christian König-Kersting, 2024. "On the robustness of social norm elicitation," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(2), pages 531-543, December.
    11. Philipp Chapkovski, 2026. "Can corruption indices lead to statistical discrimination? Experimental evidence from a within-country setting," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 49-86, July.
    12. Jagau, Stephan, 2024. "To Catch a Stag: Identifying payoff- and risk-dominance effects in coordination games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 429-448.
    13. Pietro Guarnieri & Lorenzo Spadoni, 2024. "Norms and anti-coordination: elicitation and priming in an El Farol Bar Game experiment," Discussion Papers 2024/303, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    14. Brenøe, Anne Ardila & Eyibak, Zeynep & Heursen, Lea & Ranehill, Eva & Weber, Roberto A., 2024. "Gender Identity and Economic Decision Making," IZA Discussion Papers 17564, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Gaudeul, Alexia & Giannetti, Caterina, 2025. "Beyond Performance: Exploring trade-offs in the design of financial algorithms," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    16. Yuhao Fu & Nobuyuki Hanaki, 2025. "Paying AI to Detect AI," ISER Discussion Paper 1296, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    17. César Mantilla & Zahra Murad, 2022. "Ego-relevance in team production," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Turpie, Jane & Letley, Gwyneth, 2021. "Would community conservation initiatives benefit from external financial oversight? A framed field experiment in Namibia’s communal conservancies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. González-Jiménez, Víctor & Dalton, Patricio S. & Noussair, Charles N., 2026. "Bonuses and loss aversion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    20. Franziska Lauenstein & Daniel A. Newark & Oliver Baumann, 2025. "How Mixed Performance Feedback Shapes Exploration: The Moderating Role of Self-Enhancement," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 166-185, January.
    21. Diya Abraham & Ondrej Krcal & Jonathan Stabler, 2026. "Managing Excess Demand for Primary Care: Evidence from Online Experiments," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2026-04, Department of Economics, University of Reading.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea23:335805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.