IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea14/170684.html

Welfare Impacts of Introducing Drought-Tolerant Soybeans

Author

Listed:
  • Cain, Jewelwayne S.
  • Parcell, Joe

Abstract

Soybean farmers continue to face a number of challenges, including a constant environmental threat brought about by prolonged periods of drought. Among the immediate consequences is a diminished crop growth or yield production. Previous experiences of major droughts in the U.S. also resulted in livestock deaths and transformation of fertile land into desserts. Increasing focus is being given to create and develop soybean varieties that are more drought-resistant. The introduction of more drought-resistant soybeans have the potential to provide farmers with improvements in productivity either through improvement in yield, reductions in costs, or both. This would eventually translate into changes in the value of soybeans as well as a response in acreage planted of both the new drought-resistant varieties as well conventional types of varieties. Equally impacted are product derivatives of soybeans as well as other related markets. Given the potential gains and losses to different markets and industries from introducing more drought-resistant soybeans, it is important to evaluate how welfare impacts are distributed through the soybean value chain due to the introduction of such new soybean seed technology. We apply comparative static analyses using a multi-market equilibrium displacement model that takes a value chain approach to estimate the economic implications of introducing more drought-resistant soybean seeds into the marketplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Cain, Jewelwayne S. & Parcell, Joe, 2014. "Welfare Impacts of Introducing Drought-Tolerant Soybeans," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170684, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:170684
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.170684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/170684/files/Cain_Parcell_2014_AAEA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.170684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giancarlo Moschini & Harvey Lapan & Andrei Sobolevsky, 2000. "Roundup ready® soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 33-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hareau, Guy Gaston & Norton, George W. & Mills, Bradford F. & Peterson, Everett B., 2004. "Potential Benefits Of Transgenic Rice In Asia: A General Equilibrium Approach," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20334, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Eric Tollens, 2004. "Biodiversity versus transgenic sugar beet: the one euro question," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Mario F. Teisl & Julie A. Caswell, 2003. "Information Policy and Genetically Modified Food: Weighting the Benefits and Costs," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 4, March.
    4. Brookes, Graham & Yu, Tun-Hsiang (Edward) & Tokgoz, Simla & Elobeid, Amani E., 2010. "The Production and Price Impact of Biotech Crops," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 56984, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    5. Phélinas, Pascale & Choumert, Johanna, 2017. "Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 452-462.
    6. Chetvertakov, S., . "Welfare Analysis of Lifting the GM Ban in Russia," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 8(2), pages 1-8.
    7. International Food Policy Research Institute, 2002. "Trade in genetically modified food: a survey of empirical studies," TMD discussion papers 106, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Falck-Zepeda, José B. & Horna, Daniela & Smale, Melinda, 2007. "The economic impact and the distribution of benefits and risk from the adoption of insect resistant (Bt) cotton in West Africa," IFPRI discussion papers 718, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Troy G. Schmitz & Andrew Schmitz & Charles B. Moss, 2005. "The economic impact of StarLink corn," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 391-407.
    10. Price, Gregory K. & Lin, William W. & Falck-Zepeda, Jose Benjamin & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 2003. "Size And Distribution Of Market Benefits From Adopting Biotech Crops," Technical Bulletins 33562, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Lee, Yunkyung & Perrin, Richard K. & Fulginiti, Lilyan E., 2022. "Potential Economic Impacts of Gene-edited High-oleic Soybeans," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322392, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Federico Ciliberto & GianCarlo Moschini & Edward D. Perry, 2019. "Valuing product innovation: genetically engineered varieties in US corn and soybeans," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 615-644, September.
    13. repec:isu:genstf:200901010800001872 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Marra, Michele C. & Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M., 2002. "The Payoffs To Agricultural Biotechnology: An Assessment Of The Evidence," EPTD Discussion Papers 16093, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Matin Qaim & Greg Traxler, 2005. "Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(1), pages 73-86, January.
    16. Lemarie, Stephane & Ramani, Shyama, 2003. "Analysis Of The Vertical Relationships Between Seed And Biotech Companies," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22041, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Harrington, David H. & Jefferson-Moore, Kenrett Y., 2006. "The Distribution of Rents in Supply Chain Industries: The Case of High Oil Corn," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25579, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Moschini, GianCarlo, 2006. "Pharmaceutical and Industrial Traits in Genetically Modified Crops: Co-existence with Conventional Agriculture," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18544, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    19. Meilke, Karl D. & Pekaric-Falak, Ivana & Huff, Karen, 2001. "The Trade Effects Of Bt Corn," CATRN Papers 12889, Canadian Agri-Food Trade Research Network.
    20. William H. Kaye-Blake & Caroline M. Saunders & Selim Cagatay, 2008. "Genetic Modification Technology and Producer Returns: The Impacts of Productivity, Preferences, and Technology Uptake," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(4), pages 692-710.
    21. Mehta, N., 2015. "Changing Inter-Sectoral Linkages: Role of Technology Adoption in Agricultural Growth," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 28(Conferenc).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:170684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.