IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea00/21817.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact Of Negativity On Separability Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Eales, James S.
  • Henderson, Jason R.

Abstract

While performing separability tests, studies rarely checked negativity to ensure the appropriate curvature of the expenditure function. The effect of imposing negativity on the results of separability tests is examined. Findings indicate that imposing negativity can affect separability tests in demand systems that do not spontaneously satisfy the curvature restriction.

Suggested Citation

  • Eales, James S. & Henderson, Jason R., 2000. "The Impact Of Negativity On Separability Testing," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21817, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea00:21817
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.21817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/21817/files/sp00ea01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.21817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James A. Chalfant & Richard S. Gray & Kenneth J. White, 1991. "Evaluating Prior Beliefs in a Demand System: The Case of Meat Demand in Canada," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(2), pages 476-490.
    2. Giancarlo Moschini & Daniele Moro & Richard D. Green, 1994. "Maintaining and Testing Separability in Demand Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(1), pages 61-73.
    3. Barten, A. P. & Geyskens, E., 1975. "The negativity condition in consumer demand," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 227-260, July.
    4. Blackorby, Charles & Davidson, Russell & Schworm, William, 1991. "Implicit separability: Characterisation and implications for consumer demands," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 364-399, December.
    5. Eales, James S. & Roheim, Cathy A., 1999. "Testing Separability Of Japanese Demand For Meat And Fish Within Differential Demand Systems," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-13, July.
    6. James S. Eales & Laurian J. Unnevehr, 1988. "Demand for Beef and Chicken Products: Separability and Structural Change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(3), pages 521-532.
    7. BARTEN, Anton P. & GEYSKENS, Erik, 1975. "The negativity condition in consumer demand," LIDAM Reprints CORE 223, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    8. Dermot J. Hayes & Thomas I. Wahl & Gary W. Williams, 1990. "Testing Restrictions on a Model of Japanese Meat Demand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(3), pages 556-566.
    9. Hideo Kozumi & Noriko Hashimoto & Hikaru Hasegawa, 1999. "Testing for negativity in a demand system: A Bayesian approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 211-223.
    10. Ryan, David L & Wales, Terence J, 1998. "A Simple Method for Imposing Local Curvature in Some Flexible Consumer-Demand Systems," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 331-338, July.
    11. Sellen, Daniel & Goddard, Ellen, 1997. "Weak Separability in Coffee Demand Systems," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 24(1), pages 133-144.
    12. Diewert, W. E. & Wales, T. J., 1995. "Flexible functional forms and tests of homogeneous separability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 259-302, June.
    13. Italianer, Alexander, 1985. "A small-sample correction for the likelihood ratio test," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 315-317.
    14. Deaton, Angus S, 1974. "The Analysis of Consumer Demand in the United Kingdom, 1900-1970," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 42(2), pages 341-367, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cranfield, J. A. L. & Pellow, Scott, 2004. "The role of global vs. local negativity in functional form selection: an application to Canadian consumer demands," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 345-360, March.
    2. J. M. Gil & B. Dhehibi & M. Ben Kaabia & A. M. Angulo, 2004. "Non-stationarity and the import demand for virgin olive oil in the European Union," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(16), pages 1859-1869.
    3. Li, Wenying & Zhen, Chen, 2017. "A Reassessment of Product Aggregation Bias in Demand Analysis: An Application to the U.S. Meat Market," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258197, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Sato, Hideyasu, 2021. "Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference Tests for Foods and Drinks: The Case of Using POS Data in Japan," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329424, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    5. Sato, Hideyasu & 佐藤, 秀保, 2020. "Do Large-scale Point-of-sale Data Satisfy the Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference in Aggregation Using Representative Price Indexes?: A Case Involving Processed Food and Beverages," RCESR Discussion Paper Series DP19-2, Research Center for Economic and Social Risks, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    6. Dhar, Tirtha Pratim & Chavas, Jean-Paul & Gould, Brian W., 2002. "An Empirical Assessment of Endogeneity Issues In Demand Analysis for Differentiated Products," Research Reports 25227, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    7. Karagiannis, G. & Katranidis, S. & Velentzas, K., 2000. "An error correction almost ideal demand system for meat in Greece," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 29-35, January.
    8. Henneberry, Shida Rastegari & Piewthongngam, Kullapapruk & Qiang, Han, 1999. "Consumer Food Safety Concerns And Fresh Produce Consumption," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Keuzenkamp, Hugo A. & Barten, Anton P., 1995. "Rejection without falsification on the history of testing the homogeneity condition in the theory of consumer demand," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 103-127, May.
    10. Yeboah, Godfred & Maynard, Leigh J., 2004. "The Impact Of Bse, Fmd, And U.S. Export Promotion Expenditures On Japanese Meat Demand," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19978, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Ghazaryan, Armen & Bonanno, Alessandro & Carlson, Andrea, 2023. "I Say Milk, You Say Mylk. Demand Separability in a Broadened Milk Category," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    12. Jung, Jione & Koo, Won W., 2002. "Demand For Meat And Fish Products In Korea," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19895, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Lakkakula, Prithviraj & Schmitz, Andrew & Ripplinger, David, 2016. "U.S. Sweetener Demand Analysis: A QUAIDS Model Application," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Moro, Daniele & Sckokai, Paolo, 1999. "A Quadratic Inverse Demand System," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21560, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Barten, A.P. & Mcaleer, M., 1991. "Comparing The Empirical Perfomance Of Alternative Demand Systems," Papers 9002a, Tilburg - Center for Economic Research.
    16. Tullaya Boonsaeng & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 2009. "A Dynamic Approach to Estimating and Testing Separability in U.S. Demand for Imported and Domestic Meats," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(1), pages 139-157, March.
    17. Daniele Moro & Paolo Sckokai, 2002. "Functional separability within a quadratic inverse demand system," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 285-293.
    18. Eales, James S. & Roheim, Cathy A., 1999. "Testing Separability Of Japanese Demand For Meat And Fish Within Differential Demand Systems," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Boonsaeng, Tullaya & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 2006. "Testing Separability between Import and Domestic Commodities: Application to U.S. Meat Demand in a Dynamic Model," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35267, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Njonou, Rabelais Yankam & Frahan, Bruno Henry de & Surry, Yves R., 2002. "Testing Separability for Common Wheat Qualities in French Import Demand Market Using Aids and Rotterdam Demand Models," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24921, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea00:21817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.