IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae23/365870.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determinants of Farmer Participation in Dairy Innovation Platforms: The Case of Selected Milk sheds in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Gitari, Asunta Nyawira
  • Mburu, John
  • Ndambi, Asaah
  • Njeru, Lucy K.
  • Mburu, Mercy

Abstract

This study evaluated the determinants of participation in Dairy Innovation Platforms (DIPs) in five key milking producing counties in Kenya. The study used primary data collected from 665 farmers. Two types of farmers were surveyed: participants and non-participants of Dairy Innovation Platform (DIP) activities. The results of the binary probit model showed that household size, perception of human capacity building on improved benefits, land under fodder, social capital had positive significant influence on participation. However, distance to the milk collection centers and number of milking cows had negative significant effect on participation on farmers in the platform activities. We conclude that perception is a key driver to participation. The study recommends increased awareness on the benefits of innovation platforms; would make more households participate in DIPs. Also, policy makers should target households with substantial land for fodder as well as those already in groups to enhance participation in DIPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Gitari, Asunta Nyawira & Mburu, John & Ndambi, Asaah & Njeru, Lucy K. & Mburu, Mercy, 2023. "Determinants of Farmer Participation in Dairy Innovation Platforms: The Case of Selected Milk sheds in Kenya," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365870, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:365870
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.365870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/365870/files/369.%20Milk%20sheds%20in%20Kenya.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.365870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fischer, Elisabeth & Qaim, Matin, 2012. "Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1255-1268.
    2. Wendy Geza & Mjabuliseni Ngidi & Temitope Ojo & Adetoso Adebiyi Adetoro & Rob Slotow & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2021. "Youth Participation in Agriculture: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Hounkonnou, Dominique & Kossou, Dansou & Kuyper, Thomas W. & Leeuwis, Cees & Nederlof, E. Suzanne & Röling, Niels & Sakyi-Dawson, Owuraku & Traoré, Mamoudou & van Huis, Arnold, 2012. "An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 74-83.
    4. Musa Hasen Ahmed & Hiwot Mekonnen Mesfin, 2017. "The impact of agricultural cooperatives membership on the wellbeing of smallholder farmers: empirical evidence from eastern Ethiopia," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Emma Blackmore & Alejandro Guarin & William Vorley & Silvia Alonso & Delia Grace, 2022. "Kenya’s informal milk markets and the regulation–reality gap," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(3), May.
    6. Laurens Klerkx & Andy Hall & Cees Leeuwis, 2009. "Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer?," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(5/6), pages 409-438.
    7. Haki Pamuk & Fedes Van Rijn, 2019. "The Impact of Innovation Platform Diversity in Agricultural Network Formation and Technology Adoption: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 1240-1252, June.
    8. Spielman, David J. & Ekboir, Javier & Davis, Kristin, 2009. "The art and science of innovation systems inquiry: Applications to Sub-Saharan African agriculture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 399-405.
    9. Edward Martey & Prince Etwire & Alexander Wiredu & Wilson Dogbe, 2014. "Factors influencing willingness to participate in multi-stakeholder platform by smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana: implication for research and development," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kilelu, Catherine W. & Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2013. "Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 65-77.
    2. Hintz, Kendisha Soekardjo & Pretzsch, Jürgen, 2023. "Smallholder perceptions of and willingness to participate in Forest Farmers' Organizations: Insights from case studies in Ethiopia and Tanzania," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Yang, Huan & Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2014. "Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 115-125.
    4. Valerio, Erika & Hilmiati, Nurul & Prior, Julian & Panjaitan, Tanda, 2024. "Steering the herd or missing the mark? Navigating the role of research for development projects as innovation intermediaries in the Indonesian cattle sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    5. Foran, Tira & Butler, James R.A. & Williams, Liana J. & Wanjura, Wolf J. & Hall, Andy & Carter, Lucy & Carberry, Peter S., 2014. "Taking Complexity in Food Systems Seriously: An Interdisciplinary Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 85-101.
    6. Creppy, Priscilla & Bicknell, Kathryn & Renwick, Alan, 2024. "Understanding smallholder preferences for joint ventures in Ghana's rice sector: Improving market access through inclusive business models," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 470-481.
    7. Swaans, Cornelis P.M. & Cullen, Beth & Rooyen, Andre F. van & Adekunle, A. & Ngwenya, H. & Lema, Zelalem & Nederlof, S., 2016. "Dealing with critical challenges in African innovation platforms: Lessons for facilitation," IFPRI book chapters, in: Devaux, André; Donovan, Jason; Horton, Douglas E.; Torero, Maximo (ed.), Innovation for inclusive value-chain development: Successes and challenges, chapter 10, pages 303-328, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Kilelu, Catherine W. & Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2016. "Unraveling the role of innovation platforms in supporting coevolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy-development program," IFPRI book chapters, in: Devaux, André; Donovan, Jason; Horton, Douglas E.; Torero, Maximo (ed.), Innovation for inclusive value-chain development: Successes and challenges, chapter 9, pages 269-302, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Carlos Omar Trejo-Pech & Roselia Servín-Juárez & Álvaro Reyes-Duarte, 2023. "What sets cooperative farmers apart from non-cooperative farmers? A transaction cost economics analysis of coffee farmers in Mexico," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Jasper GRASHUIS & Ye SU, 2019. "A Review Of The Empirical Literature On Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership And Governance, Finance, And Member Attitude," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(1), pages 77-102, March.
    11. Guy Faure & Aurélie Toillier & Sarah Audouin & Syndhia Mathe & Bernard Triomphe & Ludovic Temple, 2019. "Evaluación de los sistemas de innovación agropecuaria para el diseño de políticas públicas: una revisión de la literatura," Post-Print hal-05174349, HAL.
    12. Zakari, Seydou & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Moussa, Bokar & Ibro, Germaine, 2021. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Participation in Groups and the Impact of Collective Marketing on Household Food Security and Income in Sahel, Niger," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315020, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Colvin, John & Blackmore, Chris & Chimbuya, Sam & Collins, Kevin & Dent, Mark & Goss, John & Ison, Ray & Roggero, Pier Paolo & Seddaiu, Giovanna, 2014. "In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 760-771.
    14. Dinesh Dhakal & David O’Brien & Peter Mueser, 2021. "Government Policy and Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives: A Case Study in Chitwan District, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Hoffecker, Elizabeth, 2021. "Understanding inclusive innovation processes in agricultural systems: A middle-range conceptual model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    16. Wanglin Ma & Awudu Abdulai, 2017. "The economic impacts of agricultural cooperatives on smallholder farmers in rural China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 537-551, September.
    17. Christopher Agyekumhene & Jasper R. de Vries & Annemarie van Paassen & Marc Schut & Phil MacNaghten, 2020. "Making Smallholder Value Chain Partnerships Inclusive: Exploring Digital Farm Monitoring through Farmer Friendly Smartphone Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Klerkx, Laurens & Nettle, Ruth, 2013. "Achievements and challenges of innovation co-production support initiatives in the Australian and Dutch dairy sectors: A comparative study," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 74-89.
    19. Esther J. Cheyo & Edmond Nyuyki Mainimo & Daniel M. Okello & Walter Odongo & Stephen W. Kalule, 2024. "Participation and commercialization in producer cooperatives: Insights on the role of cooperative functioning and equity strategies," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 815-834, September.
    20. Dung, Luu Tien, 2020. "A Multinomial Logit Model Analysis of Farmers’ Participation in Agricultural Cooperatives: Evidence from Vietnam," Asian Journal of Applied Economics, Kasetsart University, Center for Applied Economics Research, vol. 27(01).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:365870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.