IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/circec/v2y2022i3d10.1007_s43615-021-00115-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Reimagining Sustainable Community Sports Fields of the Future: a Framework for Convergent Science-Stakeholder Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • C. M. Straw

    (Texas A&M University)

  • B. P. McCullough

    (Texas A&M University)

  • C. Segars

    (Texas A&M University)

  • B. Daher

    (Texas A&M University)

  • M. S. Patterson

    (Texas A&M University)

Abstract

Community-level sports fields are public spaces that provide numerous physical, mental, and societal benefits. These fields are often governed, constructed, managed, and used by various interacting groups who have different value systems and preferences that impact their decisions. While sports fields offer an opportunity for community engagement and physical activity to residents of communities, poor field quality or lack of access from misinformed decisions can increase health issues and decrease physical activity participation, especially among youth. That is in addition to decisions made regarding water and energy resources required to maintain these fields. Those who have decision-making authority should consider input from the entire community and other relevant stakeholders; however, there is a lack of convergence and breakdown in communication among stakeholders’ needs and priorities. Additionally, decision-makers often lack effective tools and proper knowledge to select and manage fields to meet demand in a sustainable and just manner. The objective of this white paper is to propose an innovative framework for research that could lead to the development of a common platform for multi-stakeholder dialogue about issues related to improving the social, economic, and environmental sustainability of community-level sports fields. The framework can be implemented by innovatively bringing together physical and social scientists to (1) map and assemble pertinent stakeholders and visualize the stakeholder network, (2) measure leverage points within the stakeholder network that optimize sustainable and inclusive communication and decision-making, (3) identify perspectives surrounding decisions at the community level (through prioritizing different social, economic, and environmental indicators, with particular focus on health outcomes), and (4) develop a decision support tool to evaluate the trade-offs associated with different options. Subsequently, findings should promote and catalyze dialogue between diverse stakeholders to assist with making the complex decisions for these important public spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • C. M. Straw & B. P. McCullough & C. Segars & B. Daher & M. S. Patterson, 2022. "Reimagining Sustainable Community Sports Fields of the Future: a Framework for Convergent Science-Stakeholder Decision-Making," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s43615-021-00115-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-021-00115-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-021-00115-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-021-00115-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Dyer & Shaoqun Wu & Min-Hsien Weng, 2021. "Convergence of Public Participation, Participatory Design and NLP to Co-Develop Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    2. Garney, Whitney R. & Patterson, Megan S. & Garcia, Kristen & Muraleetharan, Daenuka & McLeroy, Kenneth, 2020. "Interorganizational network findings from a nationwide cardiovascular disease prevention initiative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Grimble, Robin & Wellard, Kate, 1997. "Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 173-193, October.
    4. Welty Peachey, Jon & Cohen, Adam & Shin, Nari & Fusaro, Bruno, 2018. "Challenges and strategies of building and sustaining inter-organizational partnerships in sport for development and peace," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 160-175.
    5. Gaetano Bertino & Gloria Rose & Johannes Kisser, 2021. "Drivers and Barriers for Implementation and International Transferability of Sustainable Pop-up Living Systems," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    6. Jon Welty Peachey & Adam Cohen & Nari Shin & Bruno Fusaro, 2018. "Challenges and strategies of building and sustaining inter-organizational partnerships in sport for development and peace," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 160-175, April.
    7. Powell, L.M. & Slater, S. & Chaloupka, F.J. & Harper, D., 2006. "Availability of physical activity-related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: A national study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(9), pages 1676-1680.
    8. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss, 2010. "Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 217-229, May.
    9. Måns Nilsson & Nina Weitz, 2019. "Governing Trade-Offs and Building Coherence in Policy-Making for the 2030 Agenda," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 254-263.
    10. Valente, T.W. & Chich, P.C. & Pentz, M.A., 2007. "Community coalitions as a system: Effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(5), pages 880-886.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathieu Marlier & Bram Constandt & Cleo Schyvinck & Thomas De Bock & Mathieu Winand & Annick Willem, 2020. "Bridge over Troubled Water: Linking Capacities of Sport and Non-Sport Organizations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 139-151.
    2. Patterson, Megan S. & Prochnow, Tyler & Richardson, Ryan G. & Jackson, Kevin P., 2020. "Using network analysis to conduct a system-wide program evaluation within a university," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Svensson, Per G. & Hambrick, Marion E., 2019. "Exploring how external stakeholders shape social innovation in sport for development and peace," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 540-552.
    4. Kang, Seungmin & Svensson, Per G., 2019. "Shared leadership in sport for development and peace: A conceptual framework of antecedents and outcomes," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 464-476.
    5. Hambrick, Marion E. & Svensson, Per G. & Kang, Seungmin, 2019. "Using social network analysis to investigate interorganizational relationships and capacity building within a sport for development coalition," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 708-723.
    6. Cohen, Adam & Taylor, Elizabeth & Hanrahan, Stephanie, 2020. "Strong intentions but diminished impact: Following up with former participants in a sport for development and peace setting," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 671-687.
    7. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    8. Sékou Samadoulougou & Laurence Letarte & Alexandre Lebel, 2022. "Association between Neighbourhood Deprivation Trajectories and Self-Perceived Health: Analysis of a Linked Survey and Health Administrative Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Natalie Slawinski & Jonatan Pinkse & Timo Busch & Subhabrata Bobby Banerjeed, 2014. "The role of short-termism and uncertainty in organizational inaction on climate change: multilevel framework," Working Papers hal-00961226, HAL.
    10. Gillespie, Stuart & van den Bold, Mara, 2015. "Stories of change in nutrition: A tool pool:," IFPRI discussion papers 1494, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    12. Schoen, Martin W. & Moreland-Russell, Sarah & Prewitt, Kim & Carothers, Bobbi J., 2014. "Social network analysis of public health programs to measure partnership," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 90-95.
    13. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    14. Catherine Le Roux & Marius Pretorius, 2016. "Conceptualizing the Limiting Issues Inhibiting Sustainability Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Kirsti Iivonen, 2018. "Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes: Have Your Coke and Drink It Too!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 309-327, March.
    16. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    17. Tina C. Ambos & Katherine Tatarinov, 2022. "Building Responsible Innovation in International Organizations through Intrapreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 92-125, January.
    18. Hellen Ogutu & Youssef El Archi & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 11-45, March.
    19. Yu, Bing & Xu, Linyu, 2016. "Review of ecological compensation in hydropower development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 729-738.
    20. Lucy W. Lu, 2021. "The moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 193-206, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s43615-021-00115-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.