IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pkk/meb014/239-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Does Reading Comments Depend on Personality? - Results of an Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Melinda Majláth

    (Óbuda University)

Abstract

Internet-usage has visibly become the part of our everyday life – especially because of the widespread usage of social network sites and relatively high penetration of computers/laptops and smart phones. From a marketing-communication point of view its great advantage is the chance to inform potential customers on a very precisely targeted way at a relatively low cost, but on the other hand, internet-users has the same possibility to give information and share their opinion on products, events or on services by writing comments. And, as sometimes they are more believable sources of information than the producer or the seller for the customers, their opinion really count and should be taken into consideration. However, it is not clear who are those who are ready to write and read these opinions and to what extent can these comments influence the readers. The aim of this study is to understand more the attitude toward and personality behind comment-reading activity. Using the personality scale identified by Isabel Briggs Myers, we can differentiate the respondents based on four aspects: (1) their flow of energy, (2) how they take in information, (3) how they prefer to make decisions, and finally, (4) the basic day-to-day lifestyle that they prefer. As a result of that we can compare the attitudes toward comment reading of the different temperament types defined by Keirsey (the Artisans, the Guardians, the Idealists and the Rationals). In this study we tested the hypothesis that men read more comments than women and that Rationals and Idealist read more comments and have more positive attitude toward comment-reading activity than Artisans and Guardians. Due to the intensive field work in February, 2014, we can analyze the responses of 992 university students of Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary in order to get closer to the understanding the nature of comment-reading.

Suggested Citation

  • Melinda Majláth, 2014. "Does Reading Comments Depend on Personality? - Results of an Empirical Study," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2014),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkk:meb014:239-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/sites/default/files/16_Majlath.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho, Jason Y.C. & Dempsey, Melanie, 2010. "Viral marketing: Motivations to forward online content," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1000-1006, September.
    2. Gupta, Pranjal & Harris, Judy, 2010. "How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1041-1049, September.
    3. Ahluwalia, Rohini, 2000. "Examination of Psychological Processes Underlying Resistance to Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(2), pages 217-232, September.
    4. Moldovan, Sarit & Goldenberg, Jacob & Chattopadhyay, Amitava, 2011. "The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating word-of-mouth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 109-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melinda Majláth, 2016. "Difference among Personality Types in Comment-Writing Behaviour," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2016),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    2. King, Robert Allen & Racherla, Pradeep & Bush, Victoria D., 2014. "What We Know and Don't Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-183.
    3. Hu, Nan & Liu, Ling & Tripathy, Arindam & Yao, Lee J., 2011. "Value relevance of blog visibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1361-1368.
    4. Philp, Matthew & Ashworth, Laurence, 2020. "I should have known better!: When firm-caused failure leads to self-image concerns and reduces negative word-of-mouth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 283-293.
    5. Maria del García-de los Salmones & Angel Herrero & Patricia Martínez, 2021. "Determinants of Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Social Networking Sites About Negative News on CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 583-597, July.
    6. Kick, Markus, 2015. "Social Media Research: A Narrative Review," EconStor Preprints 182506, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. KUMRU Uyar & YUNUS Dursun, 2015. "Consumer Ethnocentrism And Brand Name Evaluations," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(1), pages 80-89, February.
    8. Gian Luca Gregori & Valerio Temperini, 2013. "Il ruolo dell?e-learning nelle strategie di comunicazione delle imprese. Il caso della iGuzzini illuminazione," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 421-435.
    9. Irina Heimbach & Oliver Hinz, 2018. "The Impact of Sharing Mechanism Design on Content Sharing in Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 592-611, September.
    10. Dubey, Subodh & Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Cats, Oded & Bansal, Prateek, 2022. "A General Framework to Forecast the Adoption of Novel Products: A Case of Autonomous Vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 63-95.
    11. Juan Shi & Kin Keung Lai & Ping Hu & Gang Chen, 2018. "Factors dominating individual information disseminating behavior on social networking sites," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 121-139, June.
    12. He, Yi & You, Ya & Chen, Qimei, 2020. "Our conditional love for the underdog: The effect of brand positioning and the lay theory of achievement on WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 210-222.
    13. Son, Youngdoo & Kim, Wonjoon, 2023. "Development of methodology for classification of user experience (UX) in online customer review," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Heejae Shin & Wirawan Dahana, 2017. "Asymmetric Persuasive Effects of Gain- and Loss-related Messages in Electronic Word of Mouth," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-82, November.
    15. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    16. Nguyen, Hang T. & Chaudhuri, Malika, 2019. "Making new products go viral and succeed," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 39-62.
    17. Bin Guo & Shasha Zhou, 2017. "What makes population perception of review helpfulness: an information processing perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 585-608, December.
    18. Youngjin Yoo & Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Ann Majchrzak, 2012. "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1398-1408, October.
    19. Omar Merlo & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Wayne D. Hoyer, 2024. "Immunizing customers against negative brand-related information," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 140-163, January.
    20. A Fronzetti Colladon & B Guardabascio & R Innarella, 2021. "Using social network and semantic analysis to analyze online travel forums and forecast tourism demand," Papers 2105.07727, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkk:meb014:239-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexandra Vécsey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gkbmfhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.