IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/15435.html

Defining Innovatisation: The Case of New Space and the Changing Space Sector

In: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 6

Author

Listed:
  • Benoit Cornet
  • Marc-André Chavy-Macdonald
  • Dominique Foray

Abstract

The space sector has become far more dynamic and innovative, with new actors (e.g., start-ups, venture capital) entering and the ever-growing importance of private firms. In this paper we introduce a novel concept, innovatisation, to understand this phenomenon. Innovatisation describes the transformation of a sector between two modes. In a mode of technological achievements (TA), only technological (not economic) performance matters, primarily for prestige purposes; in innovation, customer preferences, commercial opportunities, and costs become essential. Studying the economics of Apollo and the commercialization attempts of the 1980s, we show how the space sector has long featured a logic of TA. Then, analyzing recent trends, we provide quantitative empirical evidence (e.g., costs) that innovation now shapes the sector, thanks to various driving forces. The driving forces behind the innovatisation process are identified building on Jones (2022) and the disruptive innovation theory.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Benoit Cornet & Marc-André Chavy-Macdonald & Dominique Foray, 2026. "Defining Innovatisation: The Case of New Space and the Changing Space Sector," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:15435
    Note: PR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c15435.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewens, Michael & Nanda, Ramana & Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew, 2018. "Cost of experimentation and the evolution of venture capital," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 422-442.
    2. Luisa Corrado & Stefano Grassi & Aldo Paolillo, 2025. "Technology spillovers from the final frontier: a long-run view of U.S. space innovation," Working Papers 202502, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. Josh Lerner, 1996. "The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Effects of the SBIR Program," NBER Working Papers 5753, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 163-184, Summer.
    5. F. M. Scherer, 1986. "Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691027, December.
    6. Lee G. Branstetter & Matej Drev & Namho Kwon, 2019. "Get with the Program: Software-Driven Innovation in Traditional Manufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 541-558, February.
    7. Grubler, Arnulf, 2010. "The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5174-5188, September.
    8. Adams, Walter & Adams, William James, 1972. "The Military-Industrial Complex: A Market Structure Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 279-287, May.
    9. Chris Freeman & Luc Soete, 1997. "The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 3, volume 1, number 0262061953, December.
    10. Ramana Nanda & Matthew Rhodes-Kropf, 2016. "Financing Entrepreneurial Experimentation," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23.
    11. repec:nos:voprec:y:2019:id:2446 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Matthew Weinzierl, 2018. "Space, the Final Economic Frontier," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(2), pages 173-192, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ruben Gaetani & Alexander T. Whalley, 2026. "Old Space, New Space: A Commercial Revolution in Innovation?," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fini, Riccardo & Perkmann, Markus & Kenney, Martin & Maki, Kanetaka M., 2023. "Are public subsidies effective for university spinoffs? Evidence from SBIR awards in the University of California system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    2. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua S. Gans & Scott Stern, 2021. "Enabling Entrepreneurial Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5510-5524, September.
    3. Kumar, Amit & Operti, Elisa, 2025. "Recessions, institutions, and regional exploration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    4. Yoshiki Ando, 2026. "Dynamics of High‐Growth Young Firms and the Role of Venture Capitalists," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 67(3), pages 779-798, August.
    5. Bi, Ruigang & Kou, Zonglai & Zhou, Min, 2024. "How to guide venture capital to startups? Evidence from China's Science and Technology Innovation Board," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Ruben Gaetani & Alexander T. Whalley, 2026. "Old Space, New Space: A Commercial Revolution in Innovation?," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/401t6job098n79ch91o9giov9d is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Dosi, Giovanni & Lamperti, Francesco & Mazzucato, Mariana & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "Mission-oriented policies and the “Entrepreneurial State” at work: An agent-based exploration," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Karsten Wasiluk, 2015. "Path dependence and induced innovation," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2015-22, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    10. Chen, Y. Joy & Gong, Robin Kaiji & Li, Jinlin, 2026. "Industrial policy in a new era: Government venture capital in the US–China trade war," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. Karsten Wasiluk, 2014. "Imitation Induced Innovation in General Equilibrium," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2014-12, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    12. Onesun Steve Yoo & Tingliang Huang & Kenan Arifoğlu, 2021. "A Theoretical Analysis of the Lean Start-up Method," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 395-412, May.
    13. Fosfuri, Andrea & Nagar, Jay Prakash, 2026. "Timing is key: Navigating venture capital funding for science-based startups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    14. Zohal Hessami, 2016. "How Do Voters React to Complex Choices in a Direct Democracy? Evidence from Switzerland," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 263-293, May.
    15. van den Heuvel, Matthias & Popp, David, 2023. "The role of venture capital and governments in clean energy: lessons from the first cleantech bubble," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    16. Erin L. Scott & Pian Shu & Roman M. Lubynsky, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Uncertainty and Expert Evaluation: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1278-1299, March.
    17. Matthias van den Heuvel & David Popp, 2022. "The Role of Venture Capital and Governments in Clean Energy: Lessons from the First Cleantech Bubble," CESifo Working Paper Series 9684, CESifo.
    18. Foxon, T. J. & Gross, R. & Chase, A. & Howes, J. & Arnall, A. & Anderson, D., 2005. "UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2123-2137, November.
    19. Ziad Rotaba & Catherine Beaudry, 2012. "How Do High, Medium, And Low Tech Firms Innovate? A System Of Innovation (Si) Approach," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(05), pages 1-23.
    20. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    21. Lex Borghans & Bas ter Weel, 2011. "Computers, skills and wages," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(29), pages 4607-4622.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:15435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.