IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this book chapter

Determinacy, Learnability, and Plausibility in Monetary Policy Analysis: Additional Results

In: Monetary Policy under Uncertainty and Learning

Listed author(s):
  • Bennett T. McCallum

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

In contrast with recent research in monetary policy analysis which has featured a great deal of work concerning conditions for determinacy, I have argued in recent publications that least-squares (LS) learnability is a compelling necessary condition for a rational expectations (RE) equilibrium to be considered plausible. As I have demonstrated in a previous paper, in a very wide class of linear RE models, determinacy implies LS learnability (but not the converse) when individuals have knowledge of current conditions available for use in the learning process. This strong result does not pertain, however, if individuals have available, in the learning process, only information regarding previous values of endogenous variables. One task of the present paper, accordingly, is to investigate the situation that is obtained when only lagged information is available. In particular, it is shown that models that are well formulated, often (but not invariably) possess the property of E-stability and hence LS learnability if current-period information is available in the learning process, even if determinacy does not prevail. Thus plausibility of a RE solution requires both that it be learnable and that the model at hand be well formulated. A sufficient condition for both of these to hold, requiring that certain matrices have positive dominant diagonals, is introduced and considered. Unfortunately, the situation in the case of lagged information is less favorable—that is, learnability can be assured only in special cases, for which no general characterization has been found.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

in new window

This chapter was published in: Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel & Carl E. Walsh & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel (Series Editor) (ed.) Monetary Policy under Uncertainty and Learning, , chapter 7, pages 203-225, 2009.
This item is provided by Central Bank of Chile in its series Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series with number v13c07pp203-225.
Handle: RePEc:chb:bcchsb:v13c07pp203-225
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Casilla No967, Santiago

Phone: (562) 670 2000
Fax: (562) 698 4847
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Klein, Paul, 2000. "Using the generalized Schur form to solve a multivariate linear rational expectations model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(10), pages 1405-1423, September.
  2. Benhabib, Jess & Schmitt-Grohe, Stephanie & Uribe, Martin, 2001. "The Perils of Taylor Rules," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 96(1-2), pages 40-69, January.
  3. McCallum, Bennett T., 1983. "On non-uniqueness in rational expectations models : An attempt at perspective," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 139-168.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chb:bcchsb:v13c07pp203-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Claudio Sepulveda)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.