IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/ppf7.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Ingo Pfeiffer

Personal Details

First Name:Ingo
Middle Name:
Last Name:Pfeiffer
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ppf7
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books

Working papers

  1. Eickelpasch, Alexander & Kauffeld, Martina & Pfeiffer, Ingo, 2002. "The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -," ERSA conference papers ersa02p262, European Regional Science Association.
  2. Koschatzky, Knut & Muller, Emmanuel & Zenker, Andrea & Eickelpasch, Alexander & Pfeiffer, Ingo & Dohse, Dirk & Bode, Eckhardt & Gehrke, Birgit & Legler, Harald & Schmidt, Jörg, 2000. "Regionale Verteilung von Innovations- und Technologiepotentialen in Deutschland und Europa: Endbericht an das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Referat Z 25 - Kurzfassung der Projektergebni," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 2670, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).

Articles

  1. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2007. "Wirtschaftliche Vernetzung in der Region Berlin-Brandenburg ausbauen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(36), pages 541-547.
  2. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2006. "Standortverlagerungen in der ostdeutschen Industrie," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(14), pages 181-185.
  3. Ingo Pfeiffer & Reiner Stäglin, 2006. "Statistical Response Burden of Companies: Cutting Back Obligation to Report Cannot Contribute Much to Reduction of Bureaucracy," Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 2(4), pages 32-43.
  4. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2006. "Unternehmen in Ostdeutschland: wirtschaftlicher Erfolg mit Innovationen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(14), pages 173-180.
  5. Ingo Pfeiffer & Reiner Stäglin, 2006. "Statistikbelastung der Unternehmen: Reduzierung der Berichtspflichten kann nicht viel zum Bürokratieabbau beitragen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(30), pages 429-439.
  6. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2004. "InnoRegio: Unternehmen beurteilen die Wirkung des Förderprogramms insgesamt positiv," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 71(23), pages 331-337.
  7. Ingo Pfeiffer & Ring, 2002. "Modernisierung der Industrie stärkt Wirtschaftsstandort Berlin," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(36), pages 603-609.
  8. Alexander Eickelpasch & Martina Kauffeld & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2002. "Das InnoRegio-Programm: Umsetzung der Förderung und Entwicklung der Netzwerke," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(21), pages 329-338.
  9. Karl Brenke & Kurt Geppert & Rainer Hopf & Ingo Pfeiffer & Katharina C. Spieß & Dieter Vesper & Gert G. Wagner, 2002. "Bausteine für die Zukunft Berlins," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(10), pages 163-180.
  10. Alexander Eickelpasch & Martina Kauffeld-Monz & Ingo Pfeiffer & Ulrich G. Wurzel & Thomas Bachmann, 2001. "Die Förderinitiative InnoRegio: Konzeption und erste Erkenntnisse der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 68(34), pages 525-535.
  11. Ingo Pfeiffer & Peter Ring, 1998. "Entwicklungspotential des Ernährungsgewerbes in Berlin-Brandenburg," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 65(12), pages 224-227.
  12. Ingo Pfeiffer & Peter Ring, 1998. "Entwicklungspotentiale des Bauwesens in Berlin-Brandenburg," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 65(15/16), pages 273-278.
  13. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 1996. "Perspektiven der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung in Berlin," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 63(37), pages 607-613.
  14. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 1994. "Perspektiven der Erwerbstätigkeit in Berlin," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 61(44), pages 751-756.
  15. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 1994. "Zusammenarbeit von Berliner Unternehmen mit den Reformstaaten Mittel- und Osteuropas: Stand und Perspektiven," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 61(18), pages 272-281.
  16. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 1992. "Flächenbedarf der Industrie in Berlin," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 59(14), pages 163-169.

Books

  1. Ingo Pfeiffer & Björn Alecke & Alexander Eickelpasch & Georg Erber & Stefan Meyer & Marco Mundelius, 2007. "Medien- und IKT-Wirtschaft in Brandenburg: Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Ministeriums für Wirtschaft des Landes Brandenburg," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 34, number pbk34.
  2. Reiner Stäglin & Ingo Pfeiffer & Andreas Stephan unter Mitarb. von Björn Frank & Tim Pohlmann & Joachim Schintke & Manfred Schmidt & Hella Steinke & Jörg-Peter Weiß, 2006. "Die Bedeutung der Belastung der Wirtschaft durch amtliche Statistiken: Dienstleistungsvorhaben des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Projekt Nr. 29/03; Schlussbericht," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 19, number pbk19.
  3. Patricia Alvarez-Plata & Hella Engerer & Ingo Pfeiffer & Mechthild Schrooten & Stephan Paul & Stefan Stein, 2006. "Evaluierungsuntersuchungen zur Bewertung der Aufsicht der Kreditwirtschaft und Erstellung eines Erfahrungsberichts (Erfahrungsbericht Bankenaufsicht): Endbericht ; Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Bun," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, edition 2, volume 24, number pbk24.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Eickelpasch, Alexander & Kauffeld, Martina & Pfeiffer, Ingo, 2002. "The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -," ERSA conference papers ersa02p262, European Regional Science Association.

    Cited by:

    1. Martina Kauffeld-Monz, 2005. "Knowledge spillovers within regional networks of innovation and the contribution made by public research," ERSA conference papers ersa05p440, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Irina Dezhina, 2013. "Technology platforms and innovation clusters: together or separately?," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 164P, pages 120-120.

  2. Koschatzky, Knut & Muller, Emmanuel & Zenker, Andrea & Eickelpasch, Alexander & Pfeiffer, Ingo & Dohse, Dirk & Bode, Eckhardt & Gehrke, Birgit & Legler, Harald & Schmidt, Jörg, 2000. "Regionale Verteilung von Innovations- und Technologiepotentialen in Deutschland und Europa: Endbericht an das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Referat Z 25 - Kurzfassung der Projektergebni," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 2670, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).

    Cited by:

    1. Radygin, Alexander & Akshentceva, Kseniia & Chernovà, Maria & Abramov, Alexander, 2017. "Factors Affecting the Liquidity of Corporate Bonds," Working Papers 041706, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    2. Deyle, Hanno-G. & Grupp, Hariolf, 2005. "Commuters and the regional assignment of innovative activities: A methodological patent study of German districts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 221-234, March.

Articles

  1. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2006. "Standortverlagerungen in der ostdeutschen Industrie," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(14), pages 181-185.

    Cited by:

    1. Harald Zschiedrich, 2006. "Internationale Produktionsverlagerungen im Spannungsfeld von betriebs- und volkswirtschaftlichen Anforderungen," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 32(4), pages 443-470.
    2. Jürgens, Ulrich & Meißner, Heinz-Rudolf, 2008. "Ausbruch aus der Sandwich-Position? Risiken und Chancen der neuen ost-/westeuropäischen Arbeitsteilung für die ostdeutsche Automobilindustrie," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2008-301, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).

  2. Ingo Pfeiffer & Reiner Stäglin, 2006. "Statistical Response Burden of Companies: Cutting Back Obligation to Report Cannot Contribute Much to Reduction of Bureaucracy," Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 2(4), pages 32-43.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Vorgrimler & Gorja Bartsch & Florian Spengler & Daniel Kuehnhenrich, 2015. "Measuring the response burden of official statistical surveys for businesses," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 9(1), pages 59-71, April.

  3. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2006. "Unternehmen in Ostdeutschland: wirtschaftlicher Erfolg mit Innovationen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(14), pages 173-180.

    Cited by:

    1. Eickelpasch, Alexander & Hirte, Georg & Stephan, Andreas, 2016. "Firms' Evaluation of Location Quality: Evidence from East Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - German National Library of Economics, pages 241-273.
    2. Alexander Eickelpasch, 2009. "Forschung, Entwicklung und Innovation in Ostdeutschland," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 78(2), pages 78-109.
    3. Jürgens, Ulrich & Meißner, Heinz-Rudolf, 2008. "Ausbruch aus der Sandwich-Position? Risiken und Chancen der neuen ost-/westeuropäischen Arbeitsteilung für die ostdeutsche Automobilindustrie," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2008-301, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).
    4. Andreas Stephan, 2014. "Are public research spin-offs more innovative?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 353-368, August.

  4. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2004. "InnoRegio: Unternehmen beurteilen die Wirkung des Förderprogramms insgesamt positiv," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 71(23), pages 331-337.

    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Brenner & Carsten Emmrich & Charlotte Schlump, 2013. "Regional Effects of a Cluster-oriented policy measure. The Case of the InnoRegio program in Germany," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2013-05, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.

  5. Alexander Eickelpasch & Martina Kauffeld & Ingo Pfeiffer, 2002. "Das InnoRegio-Programm: Umsetzung der Förderung und Entwicklung der Netzwerke," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(21), pages 329-338.

    Cited by:

    1. Eickelpasch, Alexander & Kauffeld, Martina & Pfeiffer, Ingo, 2002. "The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -," ERSA conference papers ersa02p262, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Riedel, Jürgen, 2002. "Technologie- und Innovationspolitik in Sachsen," WSI Working Papers 106, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans-Böckler-Foundation.
    3. Gerlach, Frank & Ziegler, Astrid, 2002. "Mit Innovation und Kooperation zu mehr Beschäftigung? : zur Diskussion neuerer Beschäftigungsförderungsansätze in Regionen am Beispiel der Territorialen Beschäftigungspakte und des InnoRegio-Programms," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 35(3), pages 429-439.
    4. Karl Helmut & Antje Möller & Rüdiger Wink, 2003. "Regional Industrial Policies In Germany," CERIS Working Paper 200309, Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY -NOW- Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    5. Wink, Ruediger, 2002. "The transregional dimension of territorial knowledge management. An evolutionary perspective on the role of universities," ERSA conference papers ersa02p496, European Regional Science Association.

  6. Karl Brenke & Kurt Geppert & Rainer Hopf & Ingo Pfeiffer & Katharina C. Spieß & Dieter Vesper & Gert G. Wagner, 2002. "Bausteine für die Zukunft Berlins," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(10), pages 163-180.

    Cited by:

    1. Tom Broekel & Thomas Brenner, 2009. "Regional Factors and Innovativeness - An Empirical Analysis of Four German Industries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0917, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2009.
    2. Tom Broekel & Thomas Brenner, 2005. "Local Factors and Innovativeness – An Empirical Analysis of German Patents for Five Industries," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2005-09, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.

  7. Alexander Eickelpasch & Martina Kauffeld-Monz & Ingo Pfeiffer & Ulrich G. Wurzel & Thomas Bachmann, 2001. "Die Förderinitiative InnoRegio: Konzeption und erste Erkenntnisse der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 68(34), pages 525-535.

    Cited by:

    1. Ulf Rosner & Grit Leßmann, 2004. "Aufschwung Ost durch öffentliche Wissenschaftseinrichtungen?," Urban/Regional 0403005, EconWPA.
    2. Martina Kauffeld-Monz, 2005. "Knowledge spillovers within regional networks of innovation and the contribution made by public research," ERSA conference papers ersa05p440, European Regional Science Association.

  8. Alexander Eickelpasch & Ingo Pfeiffer, 1994. "Zusammenarbeit von Berliner Unternehmen mit den Reformstaaten Mittel- und Osteuropas: Stand und Perspektiven," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 61(18), pages 272-281.

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Eickelpasch & Tatjana Ribakova, 1997. "Restructuring and Competition Strategies of Privatised Enterprises in East Germany: What Lessons for Russia?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 157, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

Books

  1. Reiner Stäglin & Ingo Pfeiffer & Andreas Stephan unter Mitarb. von Björn Frank & Tim Pohlmann & Joachim Schintke & Manfred Schmidt & Hella Steinke & Jörg-Peter Weiß, 2006. "Die Bedeutung der Belastung der Wirtschaft durch amtliche Statistiken: Dienstleistungsvorhaben des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Projekt Nr. 29/03; Schlussbericht," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 19, number pbk19.

    Cited by:

    1. Reiner Stäglin, 2007. "Die amtliche Statistik – kein großer bürokratischer Belastungsfaktor," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 1(2), pages 97-117, October.
    2. Mangelsdorf, Stefan, 2010. "Die Transformation des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes in Berlin/Brandenburg unter Berücksichtigung der Exporte : eine empirische Analyse mit amtlichen Mikrodaten
      [The transition of the manufacturing indus
      ," MPRA Paper 39304, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Anja Malchin & Ramona Pohl, 2007. "Firmendaten der amtlichen Statistik: Datenzugang und neue Entwicklungen im Forschungsdatenzentrum," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 76(3), pages 8-16.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Ingo Pfeiffer should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.