IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wbk/wbpubs/6673.html

The Development Potential of Regional Programs : An Evaluation of World Bank Support of Multicountry Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Independent Evaluation Group

Abstract

This evaluation examines the track record of the regional development programs that the World Bank has supported over the past 10 years. While these are relatively few in number, together they offer valuable lessons for how such programs can be designed and implemented to deliver good outcomes. This evaluation, which assesses World Bank support for regional development programs over fiscal years 1995-2005, finds that a majority of the programs evaluated have been or appear likely to be effective in achieving most of their development objectives. Even stronger results could be achieved if support for regional programs were better developed as an international aid practice. These findings are based on evaluations of 19 regional programs and a review of the Bank's total portfolio of some 100 regional operations. The IEG report assessed the World Bank's support for regional development programs active between fiscal years 1995 and 2005. These accounted for less than 1 percent of total Bank financing during this period. Three key findings are: (i) regional programs can deliver strong results; (ii) success and sustainability depend on strong ownership of all participating countries; and (iii) the Bank has been particularly effective in fostering country interest in regional programs through analytical work and resource mobilization, and less effective in helping countries deal with their conflicting interests and plan for sustainable activities. The evaluation identified five design features that have proven critical to the success of regional programs: strong country commitment, scope of objectives matched to national and regional capacities, clear delineation and coordination of the roles of national and regional institutions, accountable governance arrangements, and planning for sustainability. The evaluation concluded that the Bank has an opportunity to adopt a potentially bigger role, building on examples of successful experience. To do so, the evaluation recommended that the Bank: (i) establish regional program strategies and integrate them into Country Assistance Strategies (CASs); (ii) work with partners to put together grant and loan financing packages for individual regional programs; (iii) give more attention to improving the impact of Bank support for regional partnerships; and (iv) strengthen corporate incentives and capacities to provide effective regional program support.

Suggested Citation

  • Independent Evaluation Group, 2007. "The Development Potential of Regional Programs : An Evaluation of World Bank Support of Multicountry Operations," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6673, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:6673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/e766b510-0f76-5e5a-87dc-b34a8f20cbb3/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaul, Inge & Conceicao, Pedro, 2006. "The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195179972.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massimiliano Santini & Trang Thu Tran & Andrew Beath, 2017. "Investment Climate Assessment of Bhutan," World Bank Publications - Reports 28539, The World Bank Group.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bayer, Patrick & Marcoux, Christopher & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2013. "Leveraging private capital for climate mitigation: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-24.
    2. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    3. Ronald U. Mendoza, 2007. "A Compendium of Policy Instruments to Enhance Financial Stability and Debt Management in Emerging Market Economies," Working Papers 48, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    4. Gail Hurley & Tancrède Voituriez, 2016. "Financing the SDGs in the Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Diversifying the Financing Tool-box and Managing Vulnerability," Working Papers hal-02567989, HAL.
    5. Zegras, Christopher & Nelson, Joshua & Macário, Rosário & Grillo, Christopher, 2013. "Fiscal federalism and prospects for metropolitan transportation authorities in Portugal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-12.
    6. Tanzi, Vito, 2021. "Economic Theory Versus Economic Reality: Dealing with Pandemics and Other Global Public Goods and Bads," Working Papers 21/360, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    7. Sudipto Mundle, 2010. "Countervailing Power and Missing Institutions," South Asian Survey, , vol. 17(1), pages 45-56, March.
    8. Richard M. Bird, 2014. "Global Taxes and International Taxation: Mirage and Reality," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1429, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    9. Buchholz Wolfgang & Heindl Peter, 2015. "Ökonomische Herausforderungen des Klimawandels," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 324-350, December.
    10. Bernard Gazier & Marguerite Mendell, 2009. "Karl Polanyi Et La Pédagogie De L'Incohérence," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(1), pages 1-35, March.
    11. John Scott, 2009. "Cost-benefit analysis for global public–private partnerships: an evaluation of the desirability of intergovernmental organizations entering into public–private partnerships," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 525-559, December.
    12. Hall, David & Lobina, Emanuele, 2007. "International actors and multinational water company strategies in Europe, 1990-2003," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 64-77, June.
    13. Henning Klodt & Oliver Lorz, 2008. "The coordinate plane of global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 29-40, March.
    14. Lumnije Thaçi & Arbnora Gërxhaliu, 2018. "Tax Structure and Developing Countries," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, ejes_v4_i.
    15. Richard M. Bird, 2016. "Reforming International Taxation: Is the Process the Real Product?," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 217(2), pages 159-180, June.
    16. Independent Evaluation Group, 2007. "Sourcebook for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs : Indicative Principles and Standards," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6601, April.
    17. Buchholz, Wolfgang & Rübbelke, Dirk, "undated". "Overstraining International Climate Finance: When Conflicts of Objectives Threaten Its Success," FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability 307983, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability.
    18. Kieke G.H. Okma & Adrian Kay & Shelby Hockenberry & Joanne Liu & Susan Watkins, 2016. "The changing role of health-oriented international organizations and nongovernmental organizations," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 488-510, October.
    19. Clifton, Judith & Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel, 2011. "La Nueva Política Económica de la OCDE ante el cambio en la Economía Mundial [The New Political Economy of the OECD in a context of Shifting World Wealth]," MPRA Paper 33010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Dana G. Dalrymple, 2008. "International agricultural research as a global public good: concepts, the CGIAR experience and policy issues," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 347-379.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:6673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tal Ayalon The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tal Ayalon to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.