IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wbk/wbpubs/6673.html

The Development Potential of Regional Programs : An Evaluation of World Bank Support of Multicountry Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Independent Evaluation Group

Abstract

This evaluation examines the track record of the regional development programs that the World Bank has supported over the past 10 years. While these are relatively few in number, together they offer valuable lessons for how such programs can be designed and implemented to deliver good outcomes. This evaluation, which assesses World Bank support for regional development programs over fiscal years 1995-2005, finds that a majority of the programs evaluated have been or appear likely to be effective in achieving most of their development objectives. Even stronger results could be achieved if support for regional programs were better developed as an international aid practice. These findings are based on evaluations of 19 regional programs and a review of the Bank's total portfolio of some 100 regional operations. The IEG report assessed the World Bank's support for regional development programs active between fiscal years 1995 and 2005. These accounted for less than 1 percent of total Bank financing during this period. Three key findings are: (i) regional programs can deliver strong results; (ii) success and sustainability depend on strong ownership of all participating countries; and (iii) the Bank has been particularly effective in fostering country interest in regional programs through analytical work and resource mobilization, and less effective in helping countries deal with their conflicting interests and plan for sustainable activities. The evaluation identified five design features that have proven critical to the success of regional programs: strong country commitment, scope of objectives matched to national and regional capacities, clear delineation and coordination of the roles of national and regional institutions, accountable governance arrangements, and planning for sustainability. The evaluation concluded that the Bank has an opportunity to adopt a potentially bigger role, building on examples of successful experience. To do so, the evaluation recommended that the Bank: (i) establish regional program strategies and integrate them into Country Assistance Strategies (CASs); (ii) work with partners to put together grant and loan financing packages for individual regional programs; (iii) give more attention to improving the impact of Bank support for regional partnerships; and (iv) strengthen corporate incentives and capacities to provide effective regional program support.

Suggested Citation

  • Independent Evaluation Group, 2007. "The Development Potential of Regional Programs : An Evaluation of World Bank Support of Multicountry Operations," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6673, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:6673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/e766b510-0f76-5e5a-87dc-b34a8f20cbb3/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaul, Inge & Conceicao, Pedro, 2006. "The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195179972.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massimiliano Santini & Trang Thu Tran & Andrew Beath, 2017. "Investment Climate Assessment of Bhutan," World Bank Publications - Reports 28539, The World Bank Group.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandra Cepparulo & Luisa Giuriato, 2012. "Global Challenges and Country-Specific Responses through Aid Financing of Global Public Goods," Working Papers in Public Economics 156, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome.
    2. Bayer, Patrick & Marcoux, Christopher & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2013. "Leveraging private capital for climate mitigation: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-24.
    3. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    4. Peter Lund-Thomsen, 2009. "Assessing the Impact of Public–Private Partnerships in the Global South: The Case of the Kasur Tanneries Pollution Control Project," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 57-78, May.
    5. Ronald U. Mendoza, 2007. "A Compendium of Policy Instruments to Enhance Financial Stability and Debt Management in Emerging Market Economies," Working Papers 48, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    6. Wolfgang Buchholz & Cornelia Ohl & Aneta Ufert, 2012. "Ökonomische Blickwinkel auf Gerechtigkeitsfragen am Beispiel des globalen Klimaschutzes," Discussion Paper Series RECAP15 001, RECAP15, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).
    7. Gail Hurley & Tancrède Voituriez, 2016. "Financing the SDGs in the Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Diversifying the Financing Tool-box and Managing Vulnerability," Working Papers hal-02567989, HAL.
    8. Charles Anderton & Jurgen Brauer, 2014. "Economics of Genocide and International Law," Working Papers 1409, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    9. Zegras, Christopher & Nelson, Joshua & Macário, Rosário & Grillo, Christopher, 2013. "Fiscal federalism and prospects for metropolitan transportation authorities in Portugal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Kayis-Kumar, Ann, 2015. "Taxing cross-border intercompany transactions: are financing activities fungible?," MPRA Paper 71615, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tanzi, Vito, 2021. "Economic Theory Versus Economic Reality: Dealing with Pandemics and Other Global Public Goods and Bads," Working Papers 21/360, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    12. Sudipto Mundle, 2010. "Countervailing Power and Missing Institutions," South Asian Survey, , vol. 17(1), pages 45-56, March.
    13. Richard M. Bird, 2014. "Global Taxes and International Taxation: Mirage and Reality," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1429, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    14. Buchholz Wolfgang & Heindl Peter, 2015. "Ökonomische Herausforderungen des Klimawandels," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 324-350, December.
    15. Bernard Gazier & Marguerite Mendell, 2009. "Karl Polanyi Et La Pédagogie De L'Incohérence," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(1), pages 1-35, March.
    16. John Scott, 2009. "Cost-benefit analysis for global public–private partnerships: an evaluation of the desirability of intergovernmental organizations entering into public–private partnerships," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 525-559, December.
    17. Hall, David & Lobina, Emanuele, 2007. "International actors and multinational water company strategies in Europe, 1990-2003," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 64-77, June.
    18. United Nations Development Programme UNDP, 2015. "Can GDP-Linked Official Lending to Emerging Economies and Developing Countries Enhance Risk Management and Resilience?," Working Papers id:7147, eSocialSciences.
    19. Buchholz, Wolfgang & Rübbelke, Dirk, "undated". "Overstraining International Climate Finance: When Conflicts of Objectives Threaten Its Success," FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability 307983, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability.
    20. Richard M. Bird, 2016. "Reforming International Taxation: Is the Process the Real Product?," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 217(2), pages 159-180, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:6673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tal Ayalon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.