IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbtaec/v5y2024i2p56-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biofortification: Enhancing Nutritional Value In Crops

Author

Listed:
  • Janak Singh Rawal

    (Gokuleshwor Agriculture and animal science college, Tribhuvan University, Nepal)

  • Lalendra Gurung

    (Gokuleshwor Agriculture and animal science college, Tribhuvan University, Nepal)

  • Puspa RC

    (Gokuleshwor Agriculture and animal science college, Tribhuvan University, Nepal)

  • Ganesh Raj Joshi

    (Gokuleshwor Agriculture and animal science college, Tribhuvan University, Nepal)

  • Renu Awasthi

    (Gokuleshwor Agriculture and animal science college, Tribhuvan University, Nepal)

Abstract

Biofortification is a sustainable solution to the micronutrient malnutrition problem in the world through enhancing the nutritional density of staple foods using different approaches. It mainly deals with the issue of hidden hunger which affects billions of people, especially from the developing world where their diets lack micronutrients. Crops like rice, wheat, maize, beans and others fortified with iron, zinc and vitamins among others assist in increasing the bioavailability of these nutrients in economic terms. Agronomic biofortification involves the use of fertilizers with micronutrients, conventional breeding involves choosing crop varieties with high nutrient density from a pool of germplasm while genetic engineering has the added advantage of precise nutrient enhancement seen in the case of golden rice – beta-carotene. Obstacles include socio-economic ones, culture, and regulatory factors present are the facts, but organizations such as HarvestPlus have proven the ability of biofortified crops in the fight against malnutrition. The prospects involve scaling up and shifting to multi-nutrient biofortification, as well as other types of genetic engineering in order to meet the nutritive needs. Changes in the policy and sharpening the community’s perception of the importance of the cultivation of biofortified crops within agricultural systems are central to improving dietary quality and thus the well-being across the human population.

Suggested Citation

  • Janak Singh Rawal & Lalendra Gurung & Puspa RC & Ganesh Raj Joshi & Renu Awasthi, 2024. "Biofortification: Enhancing Nutritional Value In Crops," Tropical Agroecosystems (TAEC), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 56-63, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbtaec:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:56-63
    DOI: 10.26480/taec.02.2024.56.63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://taec.com.my/archives/2taec2024/2taec2024-56-63.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/taec.02.2024.56.63?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Chege Kimenju & Hugo De Groote, 2008. "Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 38(1), pages 35-46, January.
    2. Seema Sheoran & Sandeep Kumar & Vinita Ramtekey & Priyajoy Kar & Ram Swaroop Meena & Chetan Kumar Jangir, 2022. "Current Status and Potential of Biofortification to Enhance Crop Nutritional Quality: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Aditya Parmar & Barbara Sturm & Oliver Hensel, 2017. "Crops that feed the world: Production and improvement of cassava for food, feed, and industrial uses," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(5), pages 907-927, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agossadou, A.J. & Fiamohe, R. & Tossou, H. & Kinkpe, T., 2018. "Agribusiness opportunities for youth in Nigeria: Farmers perceptions and willingness to pay for mechanized harvesting equipment," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277553, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Agyekum Michael & Jolly Curtis M. & Thompson Henry, 2018. "Aflatoxins and Health Considerations in Consumer Food Choices in Ghana," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Gautam, Ruskin & Gustafson, Christopher R. & Brooks, Kathleen R., 2017. "Label Position and it Impacts on WTP for Products Containing GMO," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258105, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Delmond, Anthony R. & McCluskey, Jill J. & Yormirzoev, Mirzobobo & Rogova, Maria A., 2018. "Russian consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 91-100.
    5. Violet K. Mugalavai, 2021. "Exploring Home-use Test to Assess Urban Consumers' Acceptance and Likelihood to Purchase Naturally Fortified Instant Whole Meal Sorghum-maize Flour Blends in Eldoret, Kenya," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Danso, G. K. & Otoo, Miriam & Duy Linh, N. & Madurangi, Ganesha, "undated". "Households’ willingness-to-pay for fish product attributes and implications for market feasibility of wastewater-based aquaculture businesses in Hanoi, Vietnam," Papers published in Journals (Open Access) H048216, International Water Management Institute.
    7. Yohanis Ngongo & Tony Basuki & Bernard deRosari & Yosep Seran Mau & Kartika Noerwijati & Helena daSilva & Alfonso Sitorus & Noldy R. E. Kotta & Wani Hadi Utomo & Erwin Ismu Wisnubroto, 2022. "The Roles of Cassava in Marginal Semi-Arid Farming in East Nusa Tenggara—Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Fiamohe, R. & Agossadou, A.J. & Kinkpe, T., 2018. "Contribution of improved processing equipment to rice value chain upgrading in West Africa: Evidence from Benin," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275966, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Mirzobobo Yormirzoev & Ramona Teuber & Daniil Baranov, 2018. "Is Tajikistan a Potential Market for Genetically Modified Potatoes?," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 216-226.
    10. George K. Danso & Miriam Otoo & William Ekere & Stanley Ddungu & Ganesha Madurangi, 2017. "Market Feasibility of Faecal Sludge and Municipal Solid Waste-Based Compost as Measured by Farmers’ Willingness-to-Pay for Product Attributes: Evidence from Kampala, Uganda," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Feyaerts, Hendrik & Maertens, Miet, 2021. "The Market for Onions or Lemons? Import Substitution and Consumer Preferences in Senegal," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315170, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Aditya Parmar & Asnake Fikre & Barbara Sturm & Oliver Hensel, 2018. "Post-harvest management and associated food losses and by-products of cassava in southern Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(2), pages 419-435, April.
    13. repec:fpr:ifprib:9780896297951 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:ags:aaea15:200414 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Maisa da Conceição Santos & Mônica Tejo Cavalcanti & Larissa Nicácio Pessoa & Zenaide Gomes da Silva & Allisson Miguel da Silva & Tancredo Souza & Juliane Maciel Henschel & Emmanuel Moreira Pereira & , 2024. "Exploring the Impact of Humic Biostimulants on Cassava Yield and Nutrition in Northeast Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-11, May.
    16. Owusu, Rebecca & Dadzie, Samuel Kwesi Ndzebah, 2021. "Heterogeneity in consumer preferences for organic and genetically modified food products in Ghana," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(2), June.
    17. Pambo, Kennedy & Otieno, David & Okello, Julius J., 2015. "Willingness-to-Pay for Sugar Fortification in Western Kenya," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 202970, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Marsy Asindu & Emily Ouma & Gabriel Elepu & Diego Naziri, 2020. "Farmer Demand and Willingness-To-Pay for Sweetpotato Silage-Based Diet as Pig Feed in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Alphonce, Roselyne & Alfnes, Frode, 2015. "Eliciting Consumer WTP for Food Characteristics in a Developing Context: Comparison of four methods in a field experiment," Working Paper Series 01-2015, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
    20. Kulkarni, Atul P. & Kuchanur, Prakash H. & Satihal, Dayanand G & Zaidi, P.H. & Rahut, Dil B, 2013. "Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Stress-Resilient Maize Hybrids in Rain-fed Agro-Environment in Karnataka," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), June.
    21. Domonko, Eammanuel & McFadden, Brandon, 2016. "Tanzanian Willingness-to-Pay for Rice that Decreases the Risk of Severe Visual Impairment," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230049, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    22. Dannenberg, Astrid, 2008. "Is it Who You Ask or How You Ask? Findings of a Meta-Analysis on Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-096, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbtaec:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:56-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://taec.com.my/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.