IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbnaim/v7y2023i1p54-62.html

Cybersecurity In U.S. And Nigeria Banking And Financial Institutions: Review And Assessing Risks And Economic Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Chibuike Daraojimba

    (University of Pretoria)

  • Okeoma Onunka

    (Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology Zaria Kaduna Nigeria)

  • Ayoola Maxwell Alabi

    (Independent Researcher, UK)

  • Chiedozie Marius Okafor

    (United States Mission, Nigeria)

  • Anwuli Nkemchor Obiki-Osafiele

    (Zenith Pensions Custodian Ltd)

  • Tochukwu Onunka

    (Abia State Oil Producing Area Development Commission)

Abstract

The digital transformation of the global financial landscape has brought forth unprecedented opportunities and challenges, particularly in the realm of cybersecurity. This paper delves into the intricate dynamics of cybersecurity within the banking sectors of two pivotal players in the global economy: the United States (U.S.) and Nigeria. Through a comprehensive exploration, the study underscores the profound significance of robust cybersecurity measures in safeguarding the integrity and security of financial institutions in today’s interconnected digital age. The research begins with a deep dive into the background of cybersecurity in financial institutions, revealing the escalating importance of digital defenses, especially in an era marked by frequent and sophisticated cyber threats. The interconnectedness of today’s financial systems and the rise of digital transactions amplifies cyber breaches’ potential risks and economic impacts. A comparative study of the U.S. and Nigerian banking systems showcases the unique challenges and solutions each country’s financial institutions face. While the U.S. grapples with issues like money laundering and the need for increased competition, Nigeria’s banking landscape is influenced by factors such as the potential of Islamic banking and the challenges of financial inclusion. Emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, are highlighted as cybersecurity game-changers. Their ability to predict, detect, and respond to threats in real-time offers a promising avenue for enhancing digital defenses. However, the paper also cautions that with technological advancements come new challenges, as adversaries too harness these technologies for more sophisticated attacks. The paper concludes with a forward-looking perspective, emphasizing the need for continuous investment in research, collaboration, education, and agile policymaking. It advocates for a unified approach, where financial institutions, regulatory bodies, and cybersecurity firms work in tandem to ensure the security and trustworthiness of the financial sectors in both nations. In essence, this research provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of cybersecurity in the banking sectors of the U.S. and Nigeria, offering insights and recommendations for fortifying defenses and ensuring financial stability in the digital age.

Suggested Citation

  • Chibuike Daraojimba & Okeoma Onunka & Ayoola Maxwell Alabi & Chiedozie Marius Okafor & Anwuli Nkemchor Obiki-Osafiele & Tochukwu Onunka, 2023. "Cybersecurity In U.S. And Nigeria Banking And Financial Institutions: Review And Assessing Risks And Economic Impacts," Acta Informatica Malaysia (AIM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 54-62, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbnaim:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:54-62
    DOI: 10.26480/aim.01.2023.54.62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://actainformaticamalaysia.com/archives/AIM/1aim2023/1aim2023-54-62.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/aim.01.2023.54.62?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emanuel Kopp & Lincoln Kaffenberger & Christopher Wilson, 2017. "Cyber Risk, Market Failures, and Financial Stability," IMF Working Papers 2017/185, International Monetary Fund.
    2. James Shires, 2018. "Enacting Expertise: Ritual and Risk in Cybersecurity," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 31-40.
    3. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "The Limits of Arbitrage," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 35-55, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dash, Saumya Ranjan & Maitra, Debasish, 2018. "Does sentiment matter for stock returns? Evidence from Indian stock market using wavelet approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 32-39.
    2. Florian Meier, 2020. "The Age of Cheap Money and Passive Investing: Are Pro Forma Earnings Value Relevant?," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 1-1.
    3. Onishchenko, Olena & Zhao, Jing & Kongahawatte, Sampath & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda, 2024. "Investor heterogeneity and anchoring-induced momentum," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    4. Anella Munro, 2014. "Exchange rates, expected returns and risk," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper Series DP2014/01, Reserve Bank of New Zealand.
    5. Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam, 2022. "Salience theory and the cross-section of stock returns: International and further evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 689-725.
    6. Chue, Timothy K. & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Mian, G. Mujtaba, 2019. "Aggregate investor sentiment and stock return synchronicity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Mohrschladt, Hannes, 2021. "The ordering of historical returns and the cross-section of subsequent returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Jiaxin Duan & Lei Lu & Yixin Wei & Fangyi Yin, 2025. "The leaders' shadow: Excessive information spillover in the Chinese stock market," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(3), pages 2454-2486, September.
    9. Scheffknecht, Lukas & Geiger, Felix, 2011. "A behavioral macroeconomic model with endogenous boom-bust cycles and leverage dynamcis," FZID Discussion Papers 37-2011, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    10. Denis Gromb & Dimitri Vayanos, 2018. "The Dynamics of Financially Constrained Arbitrage," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1713-1750, August.
    11. José Ramón Martínez Resano, 2022. "Digital resilience and financial stability. The quest for policy tools in the financial sector," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Autumn.
    12. Guo, Weiwei & Intini, Silvia & Jahanshahloo, Hossein, 2025. "Bitcoin arbitrage and exchange default risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Hauser, Florian & Huber, Jürgen, 2012. "Short-selling constraints as cause for price distortions: An experimental study," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 1279-1298.
    14. J. Bradford DeLong, 2002. "Do We Have a "New" Macroeconomy?," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 2, pages 163-184, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Adrian, Tobias & Borowiecki, Karol Jan & Tepper, Alexander, 2022. "A leverage-based measure of financial stability," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    16. Andrea Beltratti & Claudio Morana, 2006. "Net Inflows and Time-Varying Alphas: The Case of Hedge Funds," ICER Working Papers 30-2006, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    17. Brav, Alon & Geczy, Christopher & Gompers, Paul A., 2000. "Is the abnormal return following equity issuances anomalous?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 209-249, May.
    18. Olivier Blanchard, 2000. "What Do We Know about Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell Did Not?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(4), pages 1375-1409.
    19. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    20. Gromb, Denis & Vayanos, Dimitri, 2003. "Corrigendum to "Equilibrium and welfare in markets with financially constrained arbitrageurs" [J. Financial Economics 66 (2002) 361]," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 531-531, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnaim:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:54-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://actainformaticamalaysia.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.