IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/uoclwp/60278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leasing in mittelständischen Unternehmen: Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Befragung

Author

Listed:
  • Haunschild, Ljuba

Abstract

In der vorliegenden empirischen Studie, die auf einer schriftlichen Erhebung des Instituts für Mittelstandsforschung beruht, wurde der Frage nachgegangen, welche Bedeutung Leasing für mittelständische Unternehmen hat und künftig haben wird. Das Hauptaugenmerk der Analyse richtet sich darauf, Erkenntnisse über die Verbreitung, Motive, Auswirkungen, bevorzugte Vertragsgestaltung und Zufriedenheit mit dem Finanzierungsinstrument Leasing sowie den Leistungen der Leasinggesellschaften in Abhängigkeit von der Unternehmensgröße zu gewinnen. Die Ergebnisse der bi- und multivariaten Analysen weisen statistisch signifikant einen positiven Zusammenhang zwischen aktivem Leasing und Größe des Unternehmens nach: Je größer ein Unternehmen ist, desto eher werden Investitionen mittels Leasing finanziert. Auch belegen die Ergebnisse den Zusammenhang zwischen professionellem Finanzmanagement und Nutzung von Leasing: Unternehmen, die Finanzierungsentscheidungen auf Basis eines routinemäßigen Alternativenvergleichs treffen, leasen häufiger und mehr Güterarten als Unternehmen, in denen Vergleichsrechnungen nicht die Regele sind. Ferner wurde in einem Regressionsmodell der Frage nachgegangen, ob sich leasingverbundene Faktoren nachweisen lassen, durch die sich erfolgreiche Leasingnehmer von den weniger erfolgreichen unterscheiden. Außerdem liefert die Studie Erkenntnisse darüber, aus welchen Gründen Leasing als Finanzierungsalternative nicht in Betracht gezogen wird.

Suggested Citation

  • Haunschild, Ljuba, 2004. "Leasing in mittelständischen Unternehmen: Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Befragung," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 2(3), pages 3-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:uoclwp:60278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/60278/1/718237579.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Gürtler & Arno Städtler, 2002. "Leasing: Kommt die Wende?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(22), pages 31-33, November.
    2. Hartmann-Wendels, Thomas & Klein, Stefan & Suchy, Patrick C., 2003. "Leasing und Reform der Gewerbesteuer: Auswirkungen der Gewerbesteuerpflicht von Leasingraten auf die Steuerbelastung und die Finanzierung der Unternehmen sowie auf Investitionstätigkeit und Beschäftig," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 1(2), pages 3-75.
    3. Arno Städtler, 2003. "Die Investitionsschwäche und der Gesetzgeber bremsen das Leasing," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 56(23), pages 10-22, December.
    4. Sharpe, Steven A. & Nguyen, Hien H., 1995. "Capital market imperfections and the incentive to lease," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2-3), pages 271-294.
    5. Nehls, Hiltrud & Schmidt, Torsten, 2003. "Credit Crunch in Germany?," RWI Discussion Papers 6, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    6. Torsten Schmidt & Hiltrud Nehls, 2003. "Credit Crunch in Germany?," RWI Discussion Papers 0006, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    7. Joachim Gürtler & Arno Städtler, 2002. "Leasing: Mit kleinen Schritten aus der Talsohle," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(17), pages 15-17, September.
    8. Joachim Gürtler & Arno Städtler, 2003. "Leasingbranche: Keine eindeutige Tendenz beim Geschäftsklima – der Investitionsmotor stottert noch," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 56(15), pages 25-27, August.
    9. repec:zbw:rwidps:0006 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Christian Hott & André Kunkel, 2003. "Die Kreditpolitik der Banken," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 56(19), pages 51-54, October.
    11. Hans Günter Russ, 2002. "Kreditnachfrage schwach, aber auch Kreditvergabe restriktiver," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(21), pages 28-29, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hartmann-Wendels, Thomas, 2004. "Die Bedeutung des Leasings für die Unternehmensfinanzierung: Theoretische Perspektiven und empirische Ergebnisse," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 2(2), pages 7-40.
    2. Doris Neuberger & Solvig Räthke-Döppner, 2013. "Leasing by small enterprises," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7), pages 535-549, April.
    3. Hartmann-Wendels, Thomas & Winter, Jens, 2006. "Leasing und asymmetrische Informationsverteilung," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 4(1), pages 15-27.
    4. Heinrichsdorf, Jonas, 2007. "Identifizierung und Zurechnung von Leasingverhältnissen im Jahresabschluss nach IAS / IFRS im Vergleich zum HGB : Status quo und Ausblick," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 5(2), pages 3-44.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartmann-Wendels, Thomas, 2004. "Die Bedeutung des Leasings für die Unternehmensfinanzierung: Theoretische Perspektiven und empirische Ergebnisse," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 2(2), pages 7-40.
    2. Andrés Murcia Pabón, 2007. "Determinantes del acceso al crédito de los hogares colombianos," Revista ESPE - Ensayos Sobre Política Económica, Banco de la República, vol. 25(55), pages 40-83, December.
    3. Jean-Bernard Chatelain, 2002. "Structural modelling of investment and financial constraints: Where do we stand?," Working Paper Research 28, National Bank of Belgium.
    4. Wang, Jiawei (Brooke), 2023. "Natural disasters and firm leasing: A collateral channel," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Jean-Bernard Chatelain, 2003. "Structural modelling of financial constraints on investment: where do we stand?," Chapters, in: Paul Butzen & Catherine Fuss (ed.), Firms’ Investment and Finance Decisions, chapter 2, pages 40-58, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Ezzell, John R. & Vora, Premal P., 2001. "Leasing versus purchasing: Direct evidence on a corporation's motivations for leasing and consequences of leasing," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 33-47.
    7. Feld, Lars P. & Heckemeyer, Jost H. & Overesch, Michael, 2013. "Capital structure choice and company taxation: A meta-study," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2850-2866.
    8. Kusano, Masaki & Sakuma, Yoshihiro & Tsunogaya, Noriyuki, 2016. "Economic consequences of changes in the lease accounting standard: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 73-88.
    9. Mikael C. Bergbrant & Delroy M. Hunter & Patrick J. Kelly, 2015. "Product Market Competition, Capital Constraints and Firm Growth," Working Papers w0215, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    10. Natalia Nehrebecka & Aneta Dzik-Walczak, 2016. "Publication selection bias in the sources of financing the enterprises research? A Meta-Regression Analysis," Working Papers 2016-02, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    11. Stefan Sauer & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2020. "ifo Handbuch der Konjunkturumfragen," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 88, September.
    12. Kraemer-Eis, Helmut & Lang, Frank, 2012. "The importance of leasing for SME finance," EIF Working Paper Series 2012/15, European Investment Fund (EIF).
    13. Peter N. Gal & Gabor Pinter, 2017. "Capital over the Business Cycle: Renting versus Ownership," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(6), pages 1299-1338, September.
    14. Artem Marjenko & Stefan Sauer & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2019. "Die neue Kredithürde: Hintergründe und Ergebnisse," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(18), pages 46-48, September.
    15. Hu, Weiwei & Li, Kai & Xu, Yiming, 2024. "Lease-adjusted productivity measurement," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Luigi De Cesare & Lucianna Cananà & Tiziana Ciano & Massimiliano Ferrara, 2024. "Modeling financial leasing by optimal stopping approach," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 47(1), pages 199-213, June.
    17. Florian Kaposty & Philipp Klein & Matthias Löderbusch & Andreas Pfingsten, 2022. "Loss given default in SME leasing," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1561-1597, July.
    18. Stefania Cosci & Roberto Guida & Valentina Meliciani, 2015. "Leasing Decisions and Credit Constraints: Empirical Analysis on a Sample of Italian Firms," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 21(2), pages 377-398, March.
    19. Anna Białek-Jaworska & Natalia Nehrebecka, 2016. "Determinants of Polish Enterprises' Propensity to Lease," Working Papers 2016-07, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    20. Deborah BRANSWIJCK & Stefanie LONGUEVILLE & Patricia EVERAERT, 2011. "The Financial Impact of the Proposed Amendments to IAS 17: Evidence from Belgium and the Netherlands," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 10(2), pages 275-294, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:uoclwp:60278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.leasing.uni-koeln.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.