IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/ijrvet/178606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vocational teaching-learning through the eyes of undergraduate vocational students in Malta: A qualitative exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Said, Alison

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a deeper understanding of the teaching qualities of effective lecturers that vocational students desire, students assessment preferences and preferred learning environments. This study gives a voice to higher vocational students as it is important for vocational educators to learn what attracts students to effective learning. Due to the inquiry's exploratory nature, an interpretivist approach was used, and a constructivist grounded approach using qualitative data was adopted. A purposive approach to multiple case study selection was used where the unit of analysis was a higher vocational student. The perceptions and expectations of vocational undergraduate (EQF level 6) students in two disciplines (applied science and engineering) were explored, to identify what may constitute good practice. A total of ten participants from two different institutes within the vocational university college agreed to be interviewed. Semi-structured and photo-elicitation interviews were applied. In addition, the Powerful Learning Environments (PLEs) Framework was used as a preliminary tool to aid in the decision-making process for data collection. Iterative analysis was used for the semi- structured interviews, whilst a constant-comparative method was used for the photo- elicitation image analysis. Overall, the expectations and preferences between both groups were very similar. Results show that students expect to be taught by interactive lectures that relate theory to practice that will prepare them for the job. Formal lectures including presentations were the least favoured. Regarding teaching qualities, students expect approachable and understanding lecturers who provide concrete industrial examples. Assessment preferences included home based assignments and research projects. The preferred learning environment is in line with most characteristics of the Powerful Learning Environment. Evidence shows that there is no particular difference between a higher vocational stu- dent and a higher education student. Implications for the enhancement of students' learning processes are discussed and recommendations for further research are elaborated.

Suggested Citation

  • Said, Alison, 2018. "Vocational teaching-learning through the eyes of undergraduate vocational students in Malta: A qualitative exploratory study," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 5(1), pages 42-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ijrvet:178606
    DOI: 10.13152/IJRVET.5.1.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/178606/1/IJRVET-5-1-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.13152/IJRVET.5.1.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Voss, Roediger & Gruber, Thorsten & Szmigin, Isabelle, 2007. "Service quality in higher education: The role of student expectations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 949-959, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bilegjargal Ganbold & Kyungbo Park & Jongyi Hong, 2022. "Study of Educational Service Quality in Mongolian Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Satumari John Wafudu & Yusri Bin Kamin & Daniel Marcel, 2022. "Validity and reliability of a questionnaire developed to explore quality assurance components for teaching and learning in vocational and technical education," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angulo-Ruiz, Fernando & Pergelova, Albena & Cheben, Juraj & Angulo-Altamirano, Eladio, 2016. "A cross-country study of marketing effectiveness in high-credence services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3636-3644.
    2. Shivangi Dhawan, 2022. "Higher Education Quality and Student Satisfaction: Meta-Analysis, Subgroup Analysis and Meta-Regression," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 48-66, June.
    3. Iryna Zadorozhna & Olha Datskiv & Olena Shon, 2020. "Exploring Students’ Expectations of the University Course," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup1), pages 293-303, March.
    4. Isakin, Maksim & Teplykh, Grigory, 2011. "Research of higher engineering education quality on the base of students Interviewing data by nonlinear principal components analysis (NLPCA)," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 21(1), pages 70-96.
    5. Mirela Mabic, 2014. "Quality In Higher Education – Which Dimensions Can Be Identified From The Responses Of Students Of Economics," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 10, pages 721-731.
    6. Philippe Batifoulier & Denis Abecassis & Nicolas da Silva & Victor Duchesne & Léonard Moulin, 2016. "L’utilité sociale de la dépense publique," Working Papers hal-01421197, HAL.
    7. Silvia Bacci & Michela Gnaldi, 2015. "A classification of university courses based on students’ satisfaction: an application of a two-level mixture item response model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 927-940, May.
    8. Alexandra-Maria Drule & Irimie Emil Popa & Razvan Nistor & Alexandru Chis, 2014. "Quality of the Teaching Process and its Factors of Influence from the Perspective of Future Business Specialists," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 827-827, August.
    9. Wilhelms, Mark-Philipp & Henkel, Sven & Falk, Tomas, 2017. "To earn is not enough: A means-end analysis to uncover peer-providers' participation motives in peer-to-peer carsharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-47.
    10. Montserrat Díaz-Méndez & Mario R. Paredes & Michael Saren, 2019. "Improving Society by Improving Education through Service-Dominant Logic: Reframing the Role of Students in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    11. E. F. ESHUN & A. K. Badu & P. Korwu, 2018. "Impact of Service Quality on Students¡¯ Satisfaction in a Ghanaian Public Tertiary Institution," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 97-112, September.
    12. MUNTHIU Maria-Cristiana & CETINA Iuliana, 2016. "Understanding Students' Perception, Expectations And The Need Of Innovating Educational Services In The Digital Economy Context," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 68(3), pages 103-113, December.
    13. Lassala, Carlos & Burrus, Robert T. & Graham, J. Edward, 2016. "Business school grading on both sides of the Atlantic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5106-5110.
    14. David Schüller & Martina Rašticová & Štěpán Konečný, 2013. "Measuring student satisfaction with the quality of services offered by universities - Central European View," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(4), pages 1105-1112.
    15. Lee, Wan-I & Chang, Chih-Yuan & Liu, Yu-Lun, 2010. "Exploring customers’ store loyalty using the means-end chain approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 395-405.
    16. Chris Vassiliadis & Constantinos-Vasilios Priporas & Victoria Bellou & Andreas Andronikidis, 2013. "Customers' cognitive patterns of assurance: a dual approach," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(13-14), pages 1242-1259, October.
    17. Sandra Brkanlić & Javier Sánchez-García & Edgar Breso Esteve & Ivana Brkić & Maja Ćirić & Jovana Tatarski & Jovana Gardašević & Marko Petrović, 2020. "Marketing Mix Instruments as Factors of Improvement of Students’ Satisfaction in Higher Education Institutions in Republic of Serbia and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Nuri Mohamed M. Otman, 2020. "Quality of higher education and incidence of learning styles: A Review," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(3), pages 141-148, April.
    19. Khairunnisa & Agus Purwito & Pudji Muljono, 2017. "The Major Minor Curriculum Application in Preparing the Communication Science and Community Development Graduates to the World of Work: Graduates Perception (Case Study in Bogor Agricultural Universit," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 4(3), pages 100-107.
    20. Milad Kalantari Shahijan & Sajad Rezaei & Vinitha Padmanabhan Guptan, 2018. "Marketing public and private higher education institutions: A total experiential model of international student’s satisfaction, performance and continues intention," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(2), pages 205-234, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ijrvet:178606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://vetnetsite.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.