IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/337873.html

Transactions and relationships in stakeholder theory: A Luhmannian view

Author

Listed:
  • Valentinov, Vladislav
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Schultz, Felix Carl

Abstract

Stakeholder theory has often elevated relationships above transactions, portraying relationships as morally richer and strategically superior. This asymmetry can obscure Freeman’s original insight that both are indispensable to value creation. Drawing on Luhmann’s theory of social systems, we reconceptualize transactions as the elemental operations that reproduce the economic system, while stakeholder relationships generate the legitimacy and trust that stabilize these operations. We argue that transactions and relationships are functionally distinct yet mutually reinforcing: transactions sustain the autonomy of the economy, while relationships provide the social acceptance necessary for its continued viability. Methodologically, the paper adopts a conceptual research design and develops a systems-theoretical framework through theoretical synthesis of scholarship in stakeholder and systems theory. The framework advances stakeholder theory by restoring conceptual symmetry between relationships and transactions and by sensitizing managers to the need for ongoing calibration that aligns the two.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentinov, Vladislav & Pies, Ingo & Schultz, Felix Carl, 2026. "Transactions and relationships in stakeholder theory: A Luhmannian view," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 207, pages 1-11.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:337873
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/337873/1/Valentinov_2026_Transactions_stakeholder_theory.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Bakker, Frank G.A. & Rasche, Andreas & Ponte, Stefano, 2019. "Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives on Sustainability: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda for Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 343-383, July.
    2. Vladislav Valentinov & Steffen Roth, 2024. "Relationality in transaction cost economics and stakeholder theory: A new conceptual framework," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 535-546, July.
    3. Yassin Denis Bouzzine & Rainer Lueg, 2020. "The contagion effect of environmental violations: The case of Dieselgate in Germany," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3187-3202, December.
    4. Williamson, Oliver, 1991. "Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives," Institute for Policy Reform Working Paper Series 294665, Institute for Policy Reform.
    5. Hilary Bradbury & Benyamin M. Bergmann Lichtenstein, 2000. "Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 551-564, October.
    6. Kari Lukka & Eija Vinnari, 2014. "Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1308-1338, October.
    7. Jeffrey S. Harrison & Andrew C. Wicks, 2021. "Harmful Stakeholder Strategies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 405-419, March.
    8. Douglas A. Bosse & Richard Coughlan, 2016. "Stakeholder Relationship Bonds," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(7), pages 1197-1222, November.
    9. Edward Freeman, R. & Evan, William M., 1990. "Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation," Journal of Behavioral Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 337-359.
    10. Valentinov, Vladislav & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2024. "The idea of adaptation in transaction cost economics: an application to stakeholder theory," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(3), pages 473-495.
    11. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2013-1265 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kari Lukka & Eija Vinnari, 2014. "Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1308-1338, October.
    13. Aksoy, Lerzan & Banda, Sandhya & Harmeling, Colleen & Keiningham, Timothy L. & Pansari, Anita, 2022. "Marketing’s role in multi-stakeholder engagement," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 445-461.
    14. Riikka Tapaninaho & Anna Heikkinen, 2022. "Value creation in circular economy business for sustainability: A stakeholder relationship perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2728-2740, September.
    15. Laura Corazza & Dario Cottafava & Daniel Torchia & Amandeep Dhir, 2024. "Interpreting stakeholder ecosystems through relational stakeholder theory: The case of a highly contested megaproject," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2384-2412, March.
    16. Valentinov, Vladislav & Roth, Steffen, 2024. "Relationality in transaction cost economics and stakeholder theory: A new conceptual framework," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 535-546.
    17. Elina Jaakkola, 2020. "Designing conceptual articles: four approaches," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 18-26, June.
    18. Spencer Thompson & Vladislav Valentinov, 2017. "The neglect of society in the theory of the firm: a systems-theory perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(4), pages 1061-1085.
    19. Wicks, Andrew C. & Gilbert, Daniel R. & Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "A Feminist Reinterpretation of The Stakeholder Concept," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 475-497, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kock, Florian & Nørfelt, Astrid & Josiassen, Alexander, 2025. "Darwin in the classroom: Incorporating an evolutionary perspective into tourism and hospitality education," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Vikram Kapoor & Russell Belk, 2022. "‘Pressure creates diamonds’/‘fire refines gold’: Conceptualizing coping capital," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 196-215, December.
    3. Kovalova, Maryna & Valentinov, Vladislav & Gagalyuk, Taras, 2025. "Societal value creation through digital technologies: Insights from stakeholder collaborations of Ukrainian agroholdings," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 580-598.
    4. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    5. Haoyan Li & Hui Jiang, 2024. "Stable Social Knowledge Creation to Solve the Contract Failure Dilemma in International Construction Engineering: A Liquid Crystal Metaphor," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6937-6968, June.
    6. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & David Moore, 2017. "Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 188-209, September.
    7. Susana C. Esper & Luciano Barin-Cruz & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2024. "Engaging Stakeholders During Intergovernmental Conflict: How Political Attributions Shape Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 1-27, April.
    8. Tuomas Korhonen & Virpi Sillanpää & Aki Jääskeläinen, 2023. "Anchor practices that guide horizontal performance measurement: an interventionist case study of the financial aspect of new technology implementation in healthcare," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 787-816, September.
    9. Reilley, Jacob & Löhlein, Lukas, 2023. "Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Vesa Tiitola & Maria Marek & Tuomas Korhonen & Teemu Laine, 2023. "Enabling value-in-use with digital healthcare technologies: combining service logic and pragmatic constructivism," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 841-871, September.
    11. Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, 2024. "How to craft a compelling storyline for a conceptual paper," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(3), pages 174-181, December.
    12. Vladislav Valentinov, 2023. "Stakeholder Theory: Toward a Classical Institutional Economics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88, November.
    13. Kennell, James & Šuligoj, Metod, 2024. "Conceptualising dark events: A new framework," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Helkkula, Anu & Arnould, Eric J., 2022. "Using neo-animism to revisit actors for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in S-D logic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 860-868.
    15. Max Rosvall, 2024. "Space of Challenges (SOC) Framework: Problems, Issues and Dilemmas in Sustainable Housing," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 931-958, December.
    16. Andrew S. Gallan & Anu Helkkula, 2022. "Cocreating transformative value propositions with customers experiencing vulnerability during humanitarian crises," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 85-101, June.
    17. Grzegorz Baran & Aleksandra Berkowicz, 2021. "Digital Platform Ecosystems as Living Labs for Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Innovation: A Conceptual Model Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Anne-Laure P. Winkler & Jill A. Brown & David L. Finegold, 2019. "Employees as Conduits for Effective Stakeholder Engagement: An Example from B Corporations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 913-936, December.
    19. Cazal, Didier, 2011. "RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 9.
    20. Sophie Esmann Andersen & Trine Susanne Johansen, 2024. "The activist brand and the transformational power of resistance: towards a narrative conceptual framework," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 140-152, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:337873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.