IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/331907.html

The Effect of Politicization on Protest Participation in Non‐Democracies: The Case of Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Susanszky, Pal
  • Borbáth, Endre

Abstract

Politicization—the expansion of conflict in the political system—is often assumed to be associated with high levels of participation. Yet, this is not necessarily the case, especially in contexts of democratic backsliding. This study investigates how politicization of protest events affects individuals’ willingness to participate in protests, using Hungary as a most likely case. We examine three causal mechanisms that may mediate this effect: perceived risks of participation, political efficacy, and public support. Empirically, we rely on a pre‐registered survey experiment conducted in August 2024. To operationalize politicization, we manipulated the issue's salience, the polarization of positions presented, and the number of actors involved in the protest. Our findings challenge the prevailing assumption by demonstrating that increasing politicization leads to lower levels of protest participation. In addition, causal mediation analysis shows that this demobilizing effect is primarily due to reduced perceived political efficacy and expected public support.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanszky, Pal & Borbáth, Endre, 2025. "The Effect of Politicization on Protest Participation in Non‐Democracies: The Case of Hungary," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 106(6), pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:331907
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/331907/1/Full-text-article-Susanszky-Borbath-The-effect.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pál Susánszky & Ákos Kopper & Frank T. Zsigó, 2022. "Media framing of political protests – reporting bias and the discrediting of political activism," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 312-328, July.
    2. Sasha de Vogel, 2022. "Anti-opposition crackdowns and protest: the case of Belarus, 2000–2019," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1-2), pages 9-25, March.
    3. Borbáth, Endre & Hutter, Swen & Leininger, Arndt, 2023. "Cleavage politics, polarisation and participation in Western Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 631-651.
    4. Davide Cantoni & David Y Yang & Noam Yuchtman & Y Jane Zhang, 2019. "Protests as Strategic Games: Experimental Evidence from Hong Kong's Antiauthoritarian Movement," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(2), pages 1021-1077.
    5. Ellger, Fabio, 2024. "The Mobilizing Effect of Party System Polarization. Evidence From Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 57(8), pages 1310-1338.
    6. Erin Baggott Carter & Brett L. Carter, 2021. "Propaganda and Protest in Autocracies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(5), pages 919-949, May.
    7. Allan M. Wilford, 2017. "Polarization, Number of Parties, and Voter Turnout: Explaining Turnout in 26 OECD Countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1391-1405, November.
    8. repec:ehl:lserod:100316 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis R. Martinez & Jonas Jessen & Guo Xu, 2023. "A Glimpse of Freedom: Allied Occupation and Political Resistance in East Germany," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 68-106, January.
    2. repec:osf:osfxxx:85mjs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Linek, Maximilian & Traxler, Christian, 2021. "Framing and social information nudges at Wikipedia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1269-1279.
    4. Jarke-Neuert, Johannes & Perino, Grischa & Schwickert, Henrike, 2021. "Free-Riding for Future: Field Experimental Evidence of Strategic Substitutability in Climate Protest," SocArXiv sh6dm, Center for Open Science.
    5. Nathan Canen & Kristopher Ramsay, 2024. "Quantifying theory in politics: Identification, interpretation, and the role of structural methods," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 36(4), pages 301-327, October.
    6. Shuhei Kitamura & Ryo Takahashi & Katsunori Yamada, 2025. "Misperception and Accountability in Polarized Societies," ISER Discussion Paper 1289, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    7. Alejandra Agustina Martínez, 2023. "Raise your Voice! Activism and Peer Effects in Online Social Networks," Working Papers 277, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    8. Gonzalez, Felipe & Prem, Mounu, 2020. "Police Repression and Protest Behavior: Evidence from Student Protests in Chile," SocArXiv 3xk5r, Center for Open Science.
    9. Hager, Anselm & Hensel, Lukas & Hermle, Johannes & Roth, Christopher, 2025. "Political Activists are Not Driven by Instrumental Motives: Evidence from Two Natural Field Experiments," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55, pages 1-1, January.
    10. Rabah Arezki & Alou Adesse Dama & Simeon Djankov & Ha Nguyen, 2024. "Contagious protests," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(6), pages 2397-2434, June.
    11. Eugen Dimant, 2020. "Hate Trumps Love: The Impact of Political Polarization on Social Preferences," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 029, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    12. Dräger, Lena & Gründler, Klaus & Potrafke, Niklas, 2025. "Peer Effects in Macroeconomic Expectations," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-739, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    13. Nathan Canen & Anujit Chakraborty, 2022. "Choosing The Best Incentives for Belief Elicitation with an Application to Political Protests," Papers 2210.12549, arXiv.org.
    14. Jose Morales-Arilla, 2025. "Autocrats in crisis mode: Strategic favoritism during economic shocks," Working Paper Series of the School of Government and Public Transformation 15, School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey.
    15. Raphael Brade, 2024. "Social Information and Educational Investment—Nudging Remedial Math Course Participation," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 19(1), pages 106-142, Winter.
    16. Reynaud, Arnaud & Ouvrard, Benjamin, 2024. "Re-calibrating beliefs about peers: Direct impacts and cross-learning effects in agriculture," TSE Working Papers 24-1517, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    17. Harnoor Kaur & Noam Yuchtman, 2024. "Protests on Campus: The Political Economy of Universities and Social Movements," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 66(4), pages 621-638, December.
    18. Juan S. Morales, Margaret Samahita, 2023. "Can Social Pressure Stifle Free Speech," LCERPA Working Papers bm0140, Laurier Centre for Economic Research and Policy Analysis.
    19. Rafkin, Charlie & Shreekumar, Advik & Vautrey, Pierre-Luc, 2021. "When guidance changes: Government stances and public beliefs," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Alejandra Agustina Martínez, 2023. "Raise your voice! Activism and peer effects in online social networks," Discussion Papers 2023-05, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).
    21. Boris Ginzburg & JosÔøΩ-Alberto Guerra, 2021. "Guns, pets, and strikes: an experiment on identity and political action," Documentos CEDE 19932, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:331907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.