IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/189924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leave saving options over the life course – only for the highly skilled? Evidence from two German best-practice companies

Author

Listed:
  • Wotschack, Philip

Abstract

Individual leave saving options provide new options to employees to improve their employability and work–life balance over the life course. They are based on a simple idea: Employees can deposit overtime hours or portions of due remuneration in a time credit account and withdraw them at a later point in time in order to take prolonged periods of leave for care, training, or leisure activities. It is the leading question of this article as to what extent and in which way these options are factually used by different categories of employees. By reviewing existing studies in the Netherlands and by analysing German employee data the article reveals constraints in the accessibility of leave saving options. On the basis of transaction cost theory hypotheses are formulated regarding different uses of leave saving options by age, gender, and occupational status. These hypotheses are tested using regression analysis and employee data from two German best-practice companies. They show evidence for significant restrictions in terms of a high degree of selectivity with regard to age, skill and income levels. Based on these findings recommendations for future research and working time policies are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wotschack, Philip, 2017. "Leave saving options over the life course – only for the highly skilled? Evidence from two German best-practice companies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(4), pages 396-418.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:189924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/189924/1/f-20771-full-text-Wotschack-Leave-v2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei Delsen & Jeroen Smits, 2010. "Does the Life Course Savings Scheme Have the Potential to Improve Work–Life Balance?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 583-604, September.
    2. Loek Groot & Koen Breedveld, 2004. "Time over the Life Course: Preferences, Options and Life Course Policy," Public Economics 0410005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Günther Schmid, 2008. "Full Employment in Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12888.
    4. Wotschack, Philip & Scheier, Franziska & Schulte-Braucks, Philipp & Solga, Heike, 2011. "Zeit für Lebenslanges Lernen. Neue Ansätze der betrieblichen Arbeitszeit- und Qualifizierungspolitik," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 64(10), pages 541-547.
    5. Anja-Kristin Abendroth & Laura den Dulk, 2011. "Support for the work-life balance in Europe: the impact of state, workplace and family support on work-life balance satisfaction," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(2), pages 234-256, June.
    6. Peter Ester & Ruud Muffels & Joop Schippers & Ton Wilthagen (ed.), 2008. "Innovating European Labour Markets," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13212.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wotschack, Philip, 2010. "Working-time options over the life course: New challenges to German companies in times of crisis," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Skill Formation and Labor Markets SP I 2010-502, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Brzinsky-Fay, Christian, 2010. "The concept of transitional labour markets: A theoretical and methodological inventory," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Skill Formation and Labor Markets SP I 2010-507, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Pullinger, Martin, 2014. "Working time reduction policy in a sustainable economy: Criteria and options for its design," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 11-19.
    4. Schmid, Günther, 2020. "Beyond European unemployment insurance. Less moral hazard, more moral assurance?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 465-480.
    5. Wotschack, Philip, 2018. "Optionszeiten auf Basis von Langzeitkonten - eine kritische Bilanz," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 57, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    6. Cristian Dario Castillo Robayo & Julimar Da Silva Bichara & Manuel Pérez-Trujillo, 2017. "Retornos salariales para Colombia, un análisis cuantílico," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 36(63), pages 211-246, January.
    7. O'Reilly Jacqueline, 2008. "Can a Basic Income Lead to a More Gender Equal Society?," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Hemerijck, Anton & Eichhorst, Werner, 2009. "Whatever Happened to the Bismarckian Welfare State? From Labor Shedding to Employment-Friendly Reforms," IZA Discussion Papers 4085, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Arja Jolkkonen & Pertti Koistinen & Arja Kurvinen & Liudmila Lipiäinen & Tapio Nummi & Pekka Virtanen, 2018. "Labour Market Attachment Following Major Workforce Downsizings: A Comparison of Displaced and Retained Workers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(6), pages 992-1010, December.
    10. Adam Chlebisz & Mateusz Mierzejewski, 2020. "Features of the labour market in the context of European diversity," Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 48-60, December.
    11. Maria Sironi, 2018. "Economic Conditions of Young Adults Before and After the Great Recession," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 103-116, March.
    12. Hendrik P. van Dalen & Kène Henkens & Wilma Henderikse & Joop Schippers, 2010. "Do European employers support later retirement?," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 360-373, June.
    13. Günther Schmid, 2020. "Beyond European unemployment insurance. Less moral hazard, more moral assurance?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(4), pages 465-480, November.
    14. Schmid, Günther, 2007. "Transitional labour markets: Managing social risks over the lifecourse," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2007-111, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Deniz Yucel, 2017. "Work-To-Family Conflict and Life Satisfaction: the Moderating Role of Type of Employment," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(3), pages 577-591, September.
    16. Satu Ojala & Jouko Nätti & Liudmila Lipiäinen, 2018. "Types of Temporary Employment: An 8-Year Follow-Up of Labour Market Attachment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 141-163, July.
    17. Bernard Gazier & Jérôme Gautié, 2009. "Transitional Labour Markets, from theory to policy application. The "Transitional Labour Markets" Approach: Theory, History and Future Research Agenda," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 09001, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    18. Peter Auer & Bernard Gazier, 2008. "Flexicurity as a Policy Agenda," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(4), pages 3-8, December.
    19. A. Lans Bovenberg, 2009. "Institutional Failures and the Life Course," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(04), pages 3-7, January.
    20. Ramona IGRET & Cristian Virgil MARINAS & Simona AGOSTON & Ileana MIRCIOI, 2016. "Work – Life Balance Practices in Romanian Organisations – A Pilot Study Conducted on HR Professionals," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:189924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.