IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v188y2025i3nwaf270019.html

The Polarization Paradox: How State Wealth and Online Media Consumption Affect Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Lance Y. Hunter

Abstract

Previous valuable scholarship has found that wealth inequality can affect political polarization within states. However, less is known regarding how overall levels of state wealth and online media consumption affect polarization. Thus, this study examines how state wealth and online media consumption affect polarization in 157 states from multiple regions and levels of development from 2000 to 2022. When including standard controls and controlling for potential endogeneity, the findings reveal that greater state wealth and online media consumption are associated with increased polarization. The rationale for the findings is that greater state wealth and online media consumption increase the prevalence of postmaterialist values within states that often clash with materialist values, leading to heightened polarization. These findings have important implications in considering how state wealth and online media consumption interact to influence polarization cross‐nationally. 先前的宝贵研究发现, 财富不平等会影响国家内部的政治极化。然而, 关于国家财富和网络媒体消费的总体水平如何影响极化, 人们知之甚少。因此, 本研究考察了2000年至2022年间, 国家财富和网络媒体消费如何影响157个来自不同地区、不同发展水平的国家的极化。在纳入标准控制变量并控制潜在内生性的情况下, 研究结果表明, 国家财富和网络媒体消费的增加与极化加剧相关。研究结果的依据是, 国家财富和网络媒体消费的增加会增加后物质主义价值观在国家内部的流行程度, 而这些价值观往往与物质主义价值观相冲突, 从而加剧极化。这些发现对于思考国家财富和网络媒体消费如何相互作用并影响跨国极化具有重要意义。 Estudios previos de gran valor han demostrado que la desigualdad de la riqueza puede afectar la polarización política dentro de los estados. Sin embargo, se sabe menos sobre cómo los niveles generales de riqueza estatal y el consumo de medios en línea afectan la polarización. Por lo tanto, este estudio examina cómo la riqueza estatal y el consumo de medios en línea afectan la polarización en 157 estados de múltiples regiones y niveles de desarrollo entre 2000 y 2022. Al incluir controles estándar y controlar la posible endogeneidad, los hallazgos revelan que una mayor riqueza estatal y un mayor consumo de medios en línea se asocian con una mayor polarización. La justificación de los hallazgos es que una mayor riqueza estatal y un mayor consumo de medios en línea aumentan la prevalencia de valores posmaterialistas dentro de los estados, que a menudo entran en conflicto con los valores materialistas, lo que conduce a una mayor polarización. Estos hallazgos tienen implicaciones importantes al considerar cómo la riqueza estatal y el consumo de medios en línea interactúan para influir en la polarización a nivel transnacional.

Suggested Citation

  • Lance Y. Hunter, 2025. "The Polarization Paradox: How State Wealth and Online Media Consumption Affect Polarization," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 188(3), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:188:y:2025:i:3:n:waf270019
    DOI: 10.1002/waf2.70019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.70019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/waf2.70019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Funke, Manuel & Schularick, Moritz & Trebesch, Christoph, 2016. "Going to extremes: Politics after financial crises, 1870–2014," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 227-260.
    2. Reiljan, Andres & Garzia, Diego & Ferreira Da Silva, Frederico & Trechsel, Alexander H., 2024. "Patterns of Affective Polarization toward Parties and Leaders across the Democratic World," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(2), pages 654-670, May.
    3. Bruce Tranter, 2015. "The Impact of Political Context on the Measurement of Postmaterial Values," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    4. Valentin Lang, 2021. "The economics of the democratic deficit: The effect of IMF programs on inequality," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 599-623, July.
    5. Jha, Chandan Kumar & Kodila-Tedika, Oasis, 2020. "Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 271-290.
    6. Julie Le Gallo & Antonio Páez, 2013. "Using Synthetic Variables in Instrumental Variable Estimation of Spatial Series Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(9), pages 2227-2242, September.
    7. James Foster & Michael Wolfson, 2014. "Erratum to: Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the U.S," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 12(3), pages 435-437, September.
    8. Azzimonti, Marina & Fernandes, Marcos, 2023. "Social media networks, fake news, and polarization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Pramukh Nanjundaswamy Vasist & Debashis Chatterjee & Satish Krishnan, 2024. "The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate Speech: A Cross-country Configural Narrative," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 663-688, April.
    10. Zhiyong Zhang & Lijuan Wang, 2013. "Methods for Mediation Analysis with Missing Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 154-184, January.
    11. Lipset, Seymour Martin, 1959. "Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 69-105, March.
    12. Neumayer, E. & Plumper, T., 2016. "Inequalities of income and inequalities of longevity: A cross-country study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(1), pages 160-165.
    13. David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon Hanson & Kaveh Majlesi, 2020. "Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(10), pages 3139-3183, October.
    14. Hernan Winkler, 2019. "The effect of income inequality on political polarization: Evidence from European regions, 2002–2014," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 137-162, July.
    15. Bornschier, Simon, 2019. "Historical Polarization and Representation in South American Party Systems, 1900–1990," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 153-179, January.
    16. Alexander J. Stewart & Nolan McCarty & Joanna J. Bryson, 2018. "Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline," Papers 1807.11477, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    17. Constantin Manuel Bosancianu, 2017. "A Growing Rift in Values? Income and Educational Inequality and Their Impact on Mass Attitude Polarization," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1587-1602, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ikan, Lotem & Lagziel, David & Raveh, Ohad, 2025. "Resource windfalls, connectivity, and political polarization," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Florian Dorn & Clemens Fuest & Lea Immel & Florian Neumeier, 2020. "Economic Deprivation and Radical Voting: Evidence from Germany," ifo Working Paper Series 336, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    3. Daryna Grechyna, 2023. "Political polarization in the UK: measures and socioeconomic correlates," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 210-225, June.
    4. Guirola, Luis, 2025. "Economic expectations under the shadow of party polarization: Evidence from 135 government changes," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Aggeborn, Linuz & Persson, Lovisa, 2017. "Public Finance and Right-Wing Populism," Working Paper Series 1182, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    6. Mona Foertsch & Felix Roesel, 2023. "Sports Clubs and Populism: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from German Cities," CESifo Working Paper Series 10259, CESifo.
    7. Sebastian Doerr & Stefan Gissler & José-Luis Peydró & Hans-Joachim Voth, 2018. "From finance to fascism," Economics Working Papers 1651, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Nov 2020.
    8. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1divsbu8t888r9vqektjbmlqoa is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Michael R. Strain & Stan Veuger, 2022. "Economic shocks and clinging," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(3), pages 456-475, July.
    10. Hernan Winkler, 2019. "The effect of income inequality on political polarization: Evidence from European regions, 2002–2014," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 137-162, July.
    11. Lechler, Marie, 2019. "Employment shocks and anti-EU sentiment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 266-295.
    12. Tabellini, Marco & Magistretti, Giacomo, 2020. "Economic Integration and Democracy: An Empirical Investigation," CEPR Discussion Papers 14336, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    13. Suzanne Mettler & Trevor Brown, 2022. "The Growing Rural-Urban Political Divide and Democratic Vulnerability," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 699(1), pages 130-142, January.
    14. Alrababah, Ala & Delouis-Jost, Maelle & Gauthier, Germain & Polak, Adam, 2025. "Cycling through Elections: The Political Consequences of the Tour de France," SocArXiv fj4vh_v1, Center for Open Science.
    15. O’Rourke, Kevin Hjortshøj, 2019. "Economic History and Contemporary Challenges to Globalization," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(2), pages 356-382, June.
    16. Amory Gethin & Clara Martínez-Toledano & Thomas Piketty, 2022. "Brahmin Left Versus Merchant Right: Changing Political Cleavages in 21 Western Democracies, 1948–2020," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(1), pages 1-48.
    17. Giacomo Magistretti & Marco Tabellini, 2018. "Economic Integration and Democracy: An Empirical Investigation," Harvard Business School Working Papers 19-003, Harvard Business School.
    18. Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou, 2022. "The Political Economy of Populism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 753-832, September.
    19. Kodila-Tedika, Oasis & Khalifa, Sherif, 2020. "Leaders’ Foreign Travel and Democracy," MPRA Paper 105601, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Jan 2021.
    20. Cerqua, A. & Ferrante, C. & Letta, M., 2021. "Electoral Earthquake: Natural Disasters and the Geography of Discontent," GLO Discussion Paper Series 790, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    21. Kevin Hjortshøj O’Rourke, 2018. "Economic history and contemporary challenges to globalization," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _167, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:188:y:2025:i:3:n:waf270019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.