IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v187y2024i4p448-461.html

Inequality and public opinion on military spending in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Hak‐Seon Lee

Abstract

In this article, I argue that increasing inequality should have an impact on public opinion which balances the impact of military spending in the United States. Using the so‐called “guns versus butter trade‐off” argument, I show that, as inequality increases between those at a lower income level and those at the upper end of income, the public may view social spending as too small and military spending as too large. In response, the public should act less favorably to expenditure on the military. An empirical test of the effect of inequality on public support (since the 1980s) of military spending, in which I employ public opinion data, confirms my expectations: widening inequality engenders a negative impact on public support for defense expenditures. 现有文献已探讨了多个影响军事开支舆论的因素,包括性别、政治意识形态和征兵等。广泛研究的因果关系涉及军事支出对社会不平等的影响;这种影响似乎具有积极和消极这两面。我们在本文中论证,不平等的加剧应该对舆论产生影响,从而平衡美国军事支出的影响。通过使用所谓的“大炮与黄油的权衡”论点,我们认为,随着低收入水平和高收入水平之间的不平等加剧,公众可能会认为社会支出太少,而军事支出太多。作为回应,公众应该对军事支出采取不那么喜好的态度。鉴于这种不平等可能对“公众对军事支出的支持”产生影响,我们假设,在不平等程度较大的美国州中,公众对军事支出的支持应该低于其他州。我们利用民意数据对“不平等对1980年代以来公众支持军事支出一事的影响”进行了实证检验,结果证实了我们的理论:不平等的扩大会对公众对国防支出的支持产生负面影响。 En este artículo sostengo que la creciente desigualdad debería tener un impacto en la opinión pública que equilibra el impacto del gasto militar en los Estados Unidos (EE. UU.). Usando las llamadas ‘armas’ “compensación versus mantequilla”, creo que, a medida que aumenta la desigualdad entre quienes tienen un nivel más bajo, nivel de ingresos y aquellos en el extremo superior de los ingresos, el público puede considerar el gasto social como demasiado pequeño y el gasto militar demasiado grande. En respuesta, el público debería actuar de manera menos favorable a gastos en el ejército. Una prueba empírica del efecto de la desigualdad en el apoyo público (ya que década de 1980) del gasto militar en el que empleo datos de la opinión pública confirma mi teoría: La ampliación de la desigualdad genera un impacto negativo en el apoyo público a los gastos de defensa.

Suggested Citation

  • Hak‐Seon Lee, 2024. "Inequality and public opinion on military spending in the United States," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 187(4), pages 448-461, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:187:y:2024:i:4:p:448-461
    DOI: 10.1002/waf2.12049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.12049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/waf2.12049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wlezien, Christopher, 1996. "Dynamics of Representation: The Case of US Spending on Defence," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 81-103, January.
    2. Paul Dunne & Sam Perlo-Freeman, 2003. "The Demand for Military Spending in Developing Countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 23-48.
    3. Beck, Nathaniel & Katz, Jonathan N., 1995. "What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(3), pages 634-647, September.
    4. Ioannis Choulis & Zorzeta Bakaki & Tobias Böhmelt, 2021. "Public Support for the Armed Forces: The Role of Conscription," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 240-251, February.
    5. Guy D. Whitten & Laron K. Williams, 2011. "Buttery Guns and Welfare Hawks: The Politics of Defense Spending in Advanced Industrial Democracies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(1), pages 117-134, January.
    6. Mark A. Hooker, 1996. "How do changes in military spending affect the economy? Evidence from state-level data," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Mar, pages 3-15.
    7. Wlezien, Christopher & Soroka, Stuart, 2021. "Trends in Public Support for Welfare Spending: How the Economy Matters," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 163-180, January.
    8. Bove, Vincenzo & Efthyvoulou, Georgios & Navas, Antonio, 2017. "Political cycles in public expenditure: butter vs guns," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 582-604.
    9. Eric S. Lin & Hamid E. Ali, 2009. "Military Spending and Inequality: Panel Granger Causality Test," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 46(5), pages 671-685, September.
    10. Sung Eun Kim & Johannes Urpelainen, 2017. "The Polarization of American Environmental Policy: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of Senate and House Votes, 1971–2013," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 34(4), pages 456-484, July.
    11. Narizny, Kevin, 2003. "Both Guns and Butter, or Neither: Class Interests in the Political Economy of Rearmament," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(2), pages 203-220, May.
    12. Laron K. Williams, 2019. "Guns Yield Butter? An Exploration of Defense Spending Preferences," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(5), pages 1193-1221, May.
    13. Griffin, L J & Wallace, M & Devine, J, 1982. "The Political Economy of Military Spending: Evidence from the United States," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Richard C. Eichenberg & Richard J. Stoll, 2017. "The Acceptability of War and Support for Defense Spending," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(4), pages 788-813, April.
    15. Nam, Jaehyun, 2019. "Government spending during childhood and intergenerational income mobility in the United States," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 332-343.
    16. Hamid Ali, 2007. "Military Expenditures And Inequality: Empirical Evidence From Global Data," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 519-535.
    17. J. Paul Dunne & Sam Perlo-Freeman, 2003. "The demand for military spending in developing countries: A dynamic panel analysis," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 461-474.
    18. Erik M. Fay, 2020. "Individual and Contextual Influences on Public Support for Military Spending in NATO," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 762-785, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Blum, 2021. "Democracy’s third wave and national defense spending," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 183-212, October.
    2. Töngür, Ünal & Hsu, Sara & Elveren, Adem Yavuz, 2015. "Military expenditures and political regimes: Evidence from global data, 1963–2000," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 68-79.
    3. Brian J. Phillips, 2015. "Civil war, spillover and neighbors’ military spending," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(4), pages 425-442, September.
    4. Klomp, Jeroen, 2023. "Political budget cycles in military expenditures: A meta-analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1083-1102.
    5. Seemab Gillani & Muhammad Nouman Shafiq & Tusawar Iftikhar Ahmad, 2019. "Military Expenditures and Health Outcomes: A Global Perspective," iRASD Journal of Energy and Environment, International Research Association for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Olejnik, Łukasz Wiktor, 2024. "Left-wing butter vs. right-wing guns: Government ideology and disaggregated military expenditures," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-026, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Una Hakvåg, 2017. "Russian defense spending after 2010: the interplay of personal, domestic, and foreign policy interests," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 496-510, November.
    8. Klomp, Jeroen, 2023. "Defending election victory by attacking company revenues: The impact of elections on the international defense industry," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Islam, Muhammed N., 2015. "Economic growth, repression, and state expenditure in non-democratic regimes," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 68-85.
    10. Seemab Gillani & Muhammad Nouman Shafiq & Tusawar Iftikhar Ahmad, 2019. "Military Expenditures and Health Outcomes: A Global Perspective," iRASD Journal of Economics, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Ceyhun Elgin & Adem Y. Elveren & Gökçer Özgür & Gül Dertli, 2022. "Military spending and sustainable development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 1466-1490, August.
    12. Justin Conrad & Hong-Cheol Kim & Mark Souva, 2013. "Narrow interests and military resource allocation in autocratic regimes," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 50(6), pages 737-750, November.
    13. Vincenzo Bove & Roberto Nisticò, 2014. "Coups d’état and defense spending: a counterfactual analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 321-344, December.
    14. Bove, Vincenzo & Nisticò, Roberto, 2014. "Military in politics and budgetary allocations," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 1065-1078.
    15. Vincenzo Bove & Jennifer Brauner, 2016. "The demand for military expenditure in authoritarian regimes," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 609-625, September.
    16. Johannes Blum & Niklas Potrafke, 2019. "Internationale Abkommen und Regierungswechsel: Evidenz zum NATO-Zwei-Prozent-Ziel," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(03), pages 18-21, February.
    17. Unal Tongur & Sara Hsu & Adem Yavuz Elveren, 2013. "Military Expenditures and Political Regimes: An Analysis Using Global Data, 1963-2001," ERC Working Papers 1307, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Jul 2013.
    18. Oliver Pamp & Florian Dendorfer & Paul W. Thurner, 2018. "Arm your friends and save on defense? The impact of arms exports on military expenditures," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 165-187, October.
    19. Yuleng Zeng & Andreas Dür, 2025. "Shock and awe: Economic sanctions and relative military spending," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 1968-1983, November.
    20. repec:rnp:ppaper:mn47 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Ali Hamid E., 2011. "Military Expenditures and Human Development: Guns and Butter Arguments Revisited: A Case Study from Egypt," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:187:y:2024:i:4:p:448-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.