IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v11y2008i1p15-26.html

Impacts of Organizational Culture and Personality Traits on Decision‐making in Technical Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Clark Briggs
  • Patrick Little

Abstract

Technical organizations in industries such as aerospace or automotive regularly make major decisions regarding software and other tools to support mission‐critical activities. These decisions take place at the enterprise level where functional departments must work together in ways not common before. Usually, these are high‐impact, tension‐filled decision activities that have long term effects. The organization needs a successful decision that stands the test of implementation and a sustained period of effective operation. The processes used in such cases generally follow analytical decision methods aimed at maximizing objectives. Understanding the characteristics of the organization, including the culture and the affected parties, in addition to the technical aspects of the decision may significantly increase the likelihood of success. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

Suggested Citation

  • Clark Briggs & Patrick Little, 2008. "Impacts of Organizational Culture and Personality Traits on Decision‐making in Technical Organizations," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 15-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:11:y:2008:i:1:p:15-26
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20083
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "A Psychological Perspective on Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 162-168, May.
    2. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    3. Dewispelare, Aaron R. & Herren, L. Tandy & Clemen, Robert T., 1995. "The use of probability elicitation in the high-level nuclear waste regulation program," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 5-24, March.
    4. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lauro J. Martinez & Nilesh N. Joshi & James H. Lambert, 2011. "Diagramming qualitative goals for multiobjective project selection in large‐scale systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 73-86, March.
    2. Eric D. Smith & A. Terry Bahill, 2010. "Attribute substitution in systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 130-148, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yinrunjie Zhang & Decui Liang & Zeshui Xu, 2025. "Cross-platform hotel evaluation by aggregating multi-website consumer reviews with probabilistic linguistic term set and Choquet integral," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(1), pages 221-255, May.
    2. Alejandro Salado & Roshanak Nilchiani, 2014. "A Categorization Model of Requirements Based on Max‐Neef's Model of Human Needs," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 348-360, September.
    3. Cox, James C. & Sadiraj, Vjollca, 2006. "Small- and large-stakes risk aversion: Implications of concavity calibration for decision theory," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 45-60, July.
    4. Willman, Alpo, 2007. "Sequential optimization, front-loaded information, and U.S. consumption," Working Paper Series 765, European Central Bank.
    5. Guillaume, Romain & Houé, Raymond & Grabot, Bernard, 2014. "Robust competence assessment for job assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 630-644.
    6. Juan Carlos de Pablo, 2004. "La economía como proceso decisorio. Reseña de ideas ajenas," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 263, Universidad del CEMA.
    7. Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes & Luís Alberto Duncan Rangel & Gisele Dos Santos, 2016. "An AHP-based asset allocation model," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 78-99.
    8. Miraldo, M & Galizzi, M & Stavropoulou, C, 2013. "In sickness but not in wealth: Field evidence on patients’ risk preferences in the financial and health domain," Working Papers 31053, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    9. Weber, Elke U. & Johnson, Eric J., 2012. "Psychology and behavioral economics lessons for the design of a green growth strategy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6240, The World Bank.
    10. Daniele SCHILIRÒ, 2013. "Bounded Rationality: Psychology, Economics And The Financial Crises," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 97-108.
    11. Park, Sungsoon & Rothrock, Ling, 2007. "Systematic analysis of framing bias in missile defense: Implications toward visualization design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1383-1398, November.
    12. Anu Antony & Ansted Iype Joseph, 2017. "Influence of Behavioural Factors Affecting Investment Decision—An AHP Analysis," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 16(2), pages 107-114, December.
    13. Kavous Ardalan, 2018. "Behavioral attitudes toward current economic events: a lesson from neuroeconomics," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 202-208, October.
    14. Achtnicht, Martin, 2011. "Do environmental benefits matter? Evidence from a choice experiment among house owners in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 2191-2200, September.
    15. Viviana Ventre & Cruz Rambaud Salvador & Roberta Martino & Fabrizio Maturo, 2023. "A behavioral approach to inconsistencies in intertemporal choices with the Analytic Hierarchy Process methodology," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 233-264, June.
    16. Moreno-Jiménez, Jose María & Vargas, Luis G., 2018. "Cognitive Multiple Criteria Decision Making and the Legacy of the Analytic Hierarchy Process/Decisión Multicriterio Cognitiva y el Legado del Proceso Analítico Jerárquico," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 67-80, Enero.
    17. Budzinski, Oliver & Pawlowski, Tim, 2014. "The behavioural economics of competitive balance: Implications for league policy and championship management," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 89, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    18. Epley, Nicholas & Gneezy, Ayelet, 2007. "The framing of financial windfalls and implications for public policy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 36-47, February.
    19. Elisabeth Vollmer & Daniel Hermann & Oliver Musshoff, 2019. "The disposition effect in farmers’ selling behavior: an experimental investigation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 177-189, March.
    20. S. Lipovetsky, 2009. "Global Priority Estimation in Multiperson Decision Making," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 77-91, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:11:y:2008:i:1:p:15-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.