IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026is2p245-262.html

Unpackaging the Determinants of Food Waste Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Abbate
  • Piera Centobelli
  • Maria Di Gregorio

Abstract

Food waste is a significant barrier to sustainable development, negatively impacting the environment, economy and society. Consequently, it is crucial to delve into consumers' sustainable behaviour concerning food waste mitigation. This study applied the Theory of Planned Behaviour to explore the determinants of consumers' behavioural intention towards food waste reduction. Data were collected from 283 Italian consumers between June and October 2023. This study used the partial least square‐structural equation modelling (PLS‐SEM) technique for data analysis. As a result, sustainable labelling and awareness of foodstuffs traceability showed a significant and positive influence on the consumers' propensity to look for sustainable packaging, strengthening the attitude towards purchasing from responsible enterprises. This, in turn, significantly influences the behavioural intention towards food waste reduction. On another note, local food supply did not appear to be a significant predictor of attitude towards purchasing from responsible enterprises. This study offers significant insights for the food industry. Based on the core determinants of food waste reduction, agribusiness managers can move towards more sustainable production and consumption models whilst expanding their market presence by offering foodstuffs aligned with consumers' preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Abbate & Piera Centobelli & Maria Di Gregorio, 2026. "Unpackaging the Determinants of Food Waste Reduction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 245-262, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s2:p:245-262
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70315
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Kaczorowska & Krystyna Rejman & Ewa Halicka & Agata Szczebyło & Hanna Górska-Warsewicz, 2019. "Impact of Food Sustainability Labels on the Perceived Product Value and Price Expectations of Urban Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Constanza Bianchi & Veronica Devenin & Valentina Reyes, 2022. "An empirical study of consumer purchase intention for responsible enterprises in Chile," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(1), pages 105-125, January.
    3. Cordula Hinkes & Inken Christoph-Schulz, 2020. "No Palm Oil or Certified Sustainable Palm Oil? Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Role of Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Moser, Andrea K., 2016. "Consumers' purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: An empirical analysis of German consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 389-397.
    5. Verónica León‐Bravo & Antonella Moretto & Raffaella Cagliano & Federico Caniato, 2019. "Innovation for sustainable development in the food industry: Retro and forward‐looking innovation approaches to improve quality and healthiness," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1049-1062, September.
    6. Marko Ogorevc & Kaja Primc & Renata Slabe-Erker & Barbara Kalar & Miha Dominko & Nika Murovec & Tjaša Bartolj, 2020. "Social Feedback Loop in the Organic Food Purchase Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Mauro Viccaro & Adele Coppola & Maria Consiglia D’Angelo & Francesco Genovese & Severino Romano & Mario Cozzi, 2023. "Young People Are Not All the Same! The Theory of Planned Behaviour Applied to Food Waste Behaviour across Young Italian Generations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Kuo Ming Chu, 2018. "Mediating Influences of Attitude on Internal and External Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Organic Foods in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Bag, Surajit & Rahman, Muhammad Sabbir & Routray, Susmi & Khurana, Reema, 2025. "Regenerative supply chain orientation and coopetition in supply chain networks for ESG initiatives: A parallel mediation study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Satoru Tamaki, 2024. "Impacts of empathy, identity, and ethical branding on sustainable local food consumption," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 6184-6196, November.
    11. Dagna Siuda & Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk, 2025. "The Role of Pro-Ecological Packaging in Shaping Purchase Intentions and Brand Image in the Food Sector: An Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Broekmeulen, Rob A.C.M. & van Donselaar, Karel H., 2019. "Quantifying the potential to improve on food waste, freshness and sales for perishables in supermarkets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 265-273.
    13. Terlau, Wiltrud & Hirsch, Darya, 2015. "Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206233, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Anna Prisco & Fabiana Sepe & Luana Nanu & Mario Tani, 2025. "Exploring food delivery app adoption: Corporate social responsibility and perceived product risk's influence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1767-1778, March.
    15. Prisco, Anna & Ricciardi, Irene & Percuoco, Martina & Basile, Vincenzo, 2025. "Sustainability-driven fashion: Unpacking generation Z’s second-hand clothing purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2021. "Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Fengni Gao & Emmanuel Nketiah & Victor Shi, 2024. "Understanding and Enhancing Food Conservation Behaviors and Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Louise M. Hassan & Edward Shiu & Deirdre Shaw, 2016. "Who Says There is an Intention–Behaviour Gap? Assessing the Empirical Evidence of an Intention–Behaviour Gap in Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 219-236, June.
    19. Terlau, Wiltrud & Hirsch, Darya, 2015. "Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, July.
    20. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226316529 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andy Felix Jităreanu & Mioara Mihăilă & Alexandru-Dragoș Robu & Florin-Daniel Lipșa & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu, 2022. "Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Carmen Bălan, 2020. "How Does Retail Engage Consumers in Sustainable Consumption? A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Constanza Bianchi & Katharina Maria Hofer & M. Abu Saleh, 2026. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Generation Z Purchase Intentions: A Cross‐National Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2092-2107, March.
    4. Carla Rossi & Francesca Rivetti, 2020. "Assessing Young Consumers’ Responses to Sustainable Labels: Insights from a Factorial Experiment in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Sarah Verdonk & Keri Chiveralls & Drew Dawson, 2017. "Getting Wasted at WOMADelaide: The Effect of Signage on Waste Disposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Syed Sibghatullah Shah & Zahid Asghar, 2024. "Individual attitudes towards environmentally friendly choices: a comprehensive analysis of the role of legal rules, religion, and confidence in government," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 629-651, December.
    7. Eva-Maria Waltner & Werner Rieß & Christoph Mischo, 2019. "Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Student Sustainability Competencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Hye Jung Jung & Yun Jung Choi & Kyung Wha Oh, 2020. "Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Svenja Damberg & Ulla A. Saari & Morgane Fritz & Vytaute Dlugoborskyte & Katerina Božič, 2024. "Consumers' purchase behavior of Cradle to Cradle Certified® products—The role of trust and supply chain transparency," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8280-8299, December.
    10. Anna Lewandowska & Joanna Witczak & Pasquale Giungato & Christian Dierks & Przemyslaw Kurczewski & Katarzyna Pawlak-Lemanska, 2018. "Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer’s Typology: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Atsushi Watabe & Simon Gilby, 2020. "To See a World in a Grain of Sand—The Transformative Potential of Small Community Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Anne-Sophie Gay & Julia M. Warden & Hakan Lane, 2024. "Climate labels and the restaurant industry: a qualitative study," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 369-379, June.
    13. Klein, Sophie Maria Anneke & Polzin, Friedemann, 2025. "Greening the retail banking industry: Evidence from German bank account consumers," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    14. Arthur Filipe de Araújo & Isabel Andrés-Marques & Lorenza López Moreno, 2025. "No Planet-B Attitudes: The Main Driver of Gen Z Travelers’ Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-23, January.
    15. von Geibler, Justus & Stelzer, Franziska, 2020. "Reallabore als umweltbezogenes Politikinstrument: Kurzstudie im Rahmen der Digitalagenda des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit," Wuppertal Reports 19, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    16. Silvia H. Bonilla & Helton R. O. Silva & Marcia Terra da Silva & Rodrigo Franco Gonçalves & José B. Sacomano, 2018. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Yamoah, Fred A. & Yawson, David Eshun, . "Promoting global well-being through fairtrade food: the role of international exposure," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(2).
    18. Garcia, Teresa Cristina & Durand-Morat, Alvaro & Yang, Wei & Popp, Michael & Schreckhise, William, 2022. "Consumers’ willingness to pay for second-generation ethanol in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska & Magdalena Śmiglak-Krajewska & Stanislav Rojík & Pavlína Rojík Fulnečková, 2023. "Prices of Organic Food—The Gap between Willingness to Pay and Price Premiums in the Organic Food Market in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Lehmann, Cathleen & Christoph-Schulz, Inken, 2023. "Is animal welfare of great importance when purchasing poultry meat? - Results from cross-national focus groups with consumers," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(02), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s2:p:245-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.