IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026is2p1-14.html

Geographical Location, Green Technology Commercialization, and Sustainable Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Adomako
  • Mai Dong Tran

Abstract

This study investigates how geographical location influences firms' sustainable innovation through the mediating role of green technology commercialization potential and the moderating effect of legal inefficiency. Drawing on a two‐wave, multi‐informant survey of 280 small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) in Vietnam, we test our research model utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM) with the maximum likelihood method. We find that firms located in large towns and urban conurbations demonstrate higher levels of green technology commercialization potential compared to those in small towns. This commercialization potential, in turn, enhances sustainable innovation outcomes. However, our findings reveal that the positive effect of green technology commercialization on sustainable innovation is significantly weakened in environments with high legal inefficiency. Furthermore, we establish that green technology commercialization mediates the relationship between geographical location and sustainable innovation. The results underscore the importance of spatial and institutional contexts in shaping environmental innovation outcomes. This study contributes to the literature by explaining the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which location and legal institutions jointly influence sustainable innovation performance in emerging market contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Adomako & Mai Dong Tran, 2026. "Geographical Location, Green Technology Commercialization, and Sustainable Innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s2:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70335
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cui, Jingbo & Dai, Jing & Wang, Zhenxuan & Zhao, Xiande, 2022. "Does Environmental Regulation Induce Green Innovation? A Panel Study of Chinese Listed Firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Bao, Yongchuan & Su, Zhongfeng & Noble, Charles H., 2021. "Determinants of new product development speed in China: A strategy tripod perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    4. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2014. "When local interaction does not suffice: sources of firm innovation in urban Norway," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 5, pages 195-222, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Syed Ali Adnan Rizvi & Giulio Buciuni & Paul Ryan, 2025. "Multinational enterprise spillover mechanisms in the genesis and evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1681-1700, October.
    6. Mair, Johanna & Marti, Ignasi, 2009. "Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 419-435, September.
    7. Magali A. Delmas & Michael W. Toffel, 2008. "Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(10), pages 1027-1055, October.
    8. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Marco Di Cataldo, 2015. "Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 673-706.
    9. Riccardo Fini & Rosa Grimaldi & Maurizio Sobrero, 2009. "Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 380-402, August.
    10. Magali A. Delmas & Sanja Pekovic, 2018. "Corporate Sustainable Innovation and Employee Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1071-1088, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Kunliang & Shao, Yanmin & Hu, Yiwen, 2025. "Responding to perceived environmental policy uncertainty with green technological innovation engagement: Evidence from a text-based measure," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Ying, Ying & Wang, Shixiang & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Make bricks without straw: Eco-innovation for resource-constrained firms in emerging markets," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Zhou, Chao & Lin, Feng, 2024. "Does global diversification promote or hinder green innovation? Evidence from Chinese multinational corporations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Sheng, Jichuan & Ding, Rui & Yang, Hongqiang, 2024. "Corporate green innovation in an aging population: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Pereira, Vijay & Nair, Asha KS. & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar, 2025. "Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Eduardo Hernandez-Rodriguez, 2024. "Technological diversification through global value chains in European regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2429, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2024.
    7. Gao, Weiyan & Wang, Yuzhang & Wang, Fengrong & Mbanyele, William, 2024. "Do environmental courts break collusion in environmental governance? Evidence from corporate green innovation in China," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 133-149.
    8. Wu, Bao & Monfort, Abel & Jin, Chenfei & Shen, Xinyan, 2022. "Substantial response or impression management? Compliance strategies for sustainable development responsibility in family firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Callum Wilkie, 2019. "Innovating in less developed regions: What drives patenting in the lagging regions of Europe and North America," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 4-37, March.
    10. Song, Wenfei & Han, Xianfeng & Liu, Qiange, 2024. "Patterns of environmental regulation and green innovation in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 176-192.
    11. Irfan, Muhammad & Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Yang, Xiaodong, 2022. "Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Magali A. Delmas & Sanja Pekovic, 2018. "Corporate Sustainable Innovation and Employee Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1071-1088, July.
    13. Dayuan Li & Min Huang & Shenggang Ren & Xiaohong Chen & Lutao Ning, 2018. "Environmental Legitimacy, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1089-1104, July.
    14. de Lange, Deborah E., 2016. "Legitimation Strategies for Clean Technology Entrepreneurs Facing Institutional Voids in Emerging Economies," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 403-415.
    15. Iulia Siedschlag & Stefano Meneto & Manuel Tong Koecklin, 2022. "Enabling Green Innovations for the Circular Economy: What Factors Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Wang, Zhaowen & Wu, Ge & Miao, Zhuang & Liu, Yuan & Guo, Anda, 2025. "How Resource-Exhausted City transition program enable green technological innovation: Evidence from county-level macro and micro perspectives in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    17. Concepción Garcés‐Ayerbe & Pilar Rivera‐Torres & Inés Suárez‐Perales, 2019. "Stakeholder engagement mechanisms and their contribution to eco‐innovation: Differentiated effects of communication and cooperation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1321-1332, November.
    18. Benhong Peng & Fei Gao, 2026. "Fortune or Misfortune? Climate Risk and Corporate ESG Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(2), pages 5097-5144, April.
    19. Guoyou Qi & Hailiang Zou & Xuemei Xie, 2020. "Governmental inspection and green innovation: Examining the role of environmental capability and institutional development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1774-1785, July.
    20. Xu, Kunliang & Shao, Yanmin & Hu, Yiwen, 2025. "Antifragility or threat-rigidity: the impact of board environmental policy uncertainty perception on corporate exploratory and exploitative green technological innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s2:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.