IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025is1p836-853.html

Sense of Intergenerational Commitment of Farmers in Shaping Intentions to Adopt Conservation Agriculture: Bridging Theory of Planned Behaviour and Socio‐Economic Theories of Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Bazyli Czyżewski
  • Michał Borychowski
  • Aleksander Grzelak
  • Anna Matuszczak
  • Agnieszka Sapa
  • Eugenia Lucasenco

Abstract

Sense of intergenerational commitment (SIC) is a key concept in the sustainable agriculture paradigm. However, a theoretical framework for integrating SIC into models describing farmers' decision‐making is still lacking. Moldovan farmers have rarely been involved in international research, so it is not widely known that they are facing progressive soil degradation for which conservation agriculture (CA) appears to be an appropriate solution. The main objective is to estimate the influence of SIC on the intention to adopt CA practises by family farms specialised in cereals in Moldova. We examine the drivers of farmers' behavioural intentions within the framework of the extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB), incorporating the assertions of theories of justice. The analysis was conducted using structural equation modelling and simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis based on the semi‐structured face‐to‐face questionnaires done in 2023. Our study is embedded in the SDGs 12 and 13 as it integrates long‐term socio‐economic continuity with pro‐environmental attitudes within a farm. The article provides both theoretical and practical contributions. The results not only show that intergenerational commitments are the most important determinants of farmers' behaviour in the estimated model, providing a baseline for policy recommendations, but also that the integration of the SIC into the TPB is a powerful extension of this theory in the agricultural context. The results demonstrate that SIC is the underestimated part of the sustainable development paradigm, suggesting that agricultural policies should pay more attention to the intergenerational continuity of family farms by introducing more schemes that support this issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Bazyli Czyżewski & Michał Borychowski & Aleksander Grzelak & Anna Matuszczak & Agnieszka Sapa & Eugenia Lucasenco, 2025. "Sense of Intergenerational Commitment of Farmers in Shaping Intentions to Adopt Conservation Agriculture: Bridging Theory of Planned Behaviour and Socio‐Economic Theories of Justice," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 836-853, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:836-853
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70037
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel A. Altieri & Clara I. Nicholls & Rene Montalba, 2017. "Technological Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture at a Crossroads: An Agroecological Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Emmeline Topp & Mohamed El Azhari & Harun Cicek & Hatem Cheikh M’Hamed & Mohamed Zied Dhraief & Oussama El Gharras & Jordi Puig Roca & Cristina Quintas-Soriano & Laura Rueda Iáñez & Abderrahmane Sakou, 2024. "Perceptions and sociocultural factors underlying adoption of conservation agriculture in the Mediterranean," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(2), pages 491-508, June.
    3. Reed, Brinton & Chan-Halbrendt, Catherine & Tamang, B.B. & Chaudhary, Narendra, 2014. "Analysis of conservation agriculture preferences for researchers, extension agents, and tribal farmers in Nepal using Analytic Hierarchy Process," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 90-96.
    4. Daniela Gottschlich & Leonie Bellina, 2017. "Environmental justice and care: critical emancipatory contributions to sustainability discourse," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 941-953, December.
    5. Rachid Aboutayeb & Aziz Baidani & Abdelmonim Zeroual & Nadia Benbrahim & Abdellah El Aissaoui & Hanane Ouhemi & Chafika Houasli & Elisabetta Mazzucotelli & Agata Gadaleta & Omar Idrissi, 2023. "Genetic Variability for Iron, Zinc, and Protein Content in a Mediterranean Lentil Collection Grown under No-Till Conditions: Towards Biofortification under Conservation Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. May, Daniel & Arancibia, Sara & Behrendt, Karl & Adams, John, 2019. "Preventing young farmers from leaving the farm: Investigating the effectiveness of the young farmer payment using a behavioural approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 317-327.
    7. Joleen C. Hadrich & Frayne Olson, 2011. "Joint measurement of farm size and farm performance: a confirmatory factor analysis," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 71(3), pages 295-309, November.
    8. Aleksander Grzelak, 2020. "The Objectives of Farm Operations—Evidence from a Region in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Simonsen, Nicolai Fink & Kjær, Trine & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte, 2021. "Pure altruism and misjudgement: A bad combination?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Joleen C. Hadrich & Frayne Olson, 2011. "Joint measurement of farm size and farm performance: a confirmatory factor analysis," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 71(3), pages 295-309, November.
    11. Judith Janker, 2020. "Moral conflicts, premises and the social dimension of agricultural sustainability," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(1), pages 97-111, March.
    12. Cameron M. Pittelkow & Xinqiang Liang & Bruce A. Linquist & Kees Jan van Groenigen & Juhwan Lee & Mark E. Lundy & Natasja van Gestel & Johan Six & Rodney T. Venterea & Chris van Kessel, 2015. "Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 517(7534), pages 365-368, January.
    13. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kryszak, Łukasz & Czyżewski, Bazyli & Sapa, Agnieszka & Lucasenco, Eugenia, 2025. "Does a sense of intergenerational commitments modify farmers' preferences for conservation tillage? Evidence from the choice experiment in Moldova," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Łukasz Kryszak & Marta Guth & Bazyli Czyżewski, 2021. "Determinants of farm profitability in the EU regions. Does farm size matter?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 90-100.
    3. Adjognon,Guigonan Serge & Nguyen Huy,Tung & Guthoff,Jonas Christoph & van Soest,Daan, 2022. "Incentivizing Social Learning for the Diffusion of Climate-Smart Agricultural Techniques," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10041, The World Bank.
    4. Tambo, J. & Mockshell, J., 2018. "Differential impacts of conservation agriculture technology options on household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277035, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Michler, Jeffrey D. & Baylis, Kathy & Arends-Kuenning, Mary & Mazvimavi, Kizito, 2019. "Conservation agriculture and climate resilience," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 148-169.
    6. Tambo, Justice A. & Mockshell, Jonathan, 2018. "Differential Impacts of Conservation Agriculture Technology Options on Household Income in Sub-Saharan Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 95-105.
    7. Gao, Li & Zhang, Wendong & Mei, Yingdan & Sam, Abdoul G. & Song, Yu & Jin, Shuqin, 2018. "Do farmers adopt fewer conservation practices on rented land? Evidence from straw retention in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 609-621.
    8. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    9. Campbell, Randall C. & Nagel, Gregory L., 2016. "Private information and limitations of Heckman's estimator in banking and corporate finance research," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 186-195.
    10. Christopher Dick-Sagoe & Ernest Ngeh Tingum & Peter Asare-Nuamah & Denis N. Yuni & Nicholas Baidoo, 2025. "Central transfers and incentives to collect local revenue among the Central Region of Ghana’s local government officials: analysing the flypaper effect," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    12. Ilona Babenko & Benjamin Bennett & John M Bizjak & Jeffrey L Coles & Jason J Sandvik, 2023. "Clawback Provisions and Firm Risk," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 191-239.
    13. Şahan, Duygu & Tuna, Okan, 2018. "Environmental innovation of transportation sector in OECD countries," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), The Road to a Digitalized Supply Chain Management: Smart and Digital Solutions for Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International C, volume 25, pages 157-170, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    14. Ruomeng Cui & Dennis J. Zhang & Achal Bassamboo, 2019. "Learning from Inventory Availability Information: Evidence from Field Experiments on Amazon," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1216-1235, March.
    15. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    16. Shaikh M. S. U. Eskander & Sam Fankhauser, 2022. "Income Diversification and Income Inequality: Household Responses to the 2013 Floods in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    17. Meng, Chang & Ghafoori, Noorulhaq, 2024. "The economic impact of terrorism in South Asia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Hwang, Yujung & Nguyen, Toan, 2025. "Is sex ratio a valid distribution factor in a collective model?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Bonoua Faye & Hélène Véronique Marie Thérèse Faye & Guoming Du & Yongfang Ma & Jeanne Colette Diéne & Edmée Mbaye & Liane Marie Thérèse Judith Faye & Yao Dinard Kouadio & Yuheng Li & Henri Marcel Seck, 2025. "Rural Development and Dynamics of Enhancing Agricultural Productivity in Senegal: Challenges, Opportunities, and Policy Implications," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Peter Harasztosi & Attila Lindner, 2019. "Who Pays for the Minimum Wage?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2693-2727, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:836-853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.