IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i3p3228-3245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epistemic Justice as a “New Normal?” Interrogating the Contributions of Communities of Practice to Decolonization of Knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Cummings
  • Nyamwaya Munthali
  • Toni Sittoni

Abstract

Recently, scholarly communities of practice have emerged with the objective of decolonizing knowledge practices within sustainable development. Their contributions to sustainability and systems change remain underexplored, possibly due to the absence of appropriate conceptual tools to analyze them. This study applies a new conceptual framework of epistemic justice, derived from the philosophical notion of epistemic injustice, to examine how these communities foster more equitable knowledge systems with regards to the social dimensions of sustainable development. Using critical discourse analysis, data from the websites of two scholarly communities of practice were analyzed, revealing their innovative approaches to advancing epistemic justice through knowledge practices. The findings emphasize the utility of the epistemic justice framework in understanding the role of these scholarly communities of practice in fostering social sustainability, specifically by contributing to more equitable knowledge practices and a “new normal.”

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Cummings & Nyamwaya Munthali & Toni Sittoni, 2025. "Epistemic Justice as a “New Normal?” Interrogating the Contributions of Communities of Practice to Decolonization of Knowledge," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3228-3245, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:3228-3245
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:3228-3245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.