IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v39y2021i2p181-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals: The case of Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Jönsson
  • Magdalena Bexell

Abstract

Motivation Despite increasing research on the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there is a lack of attention to the role of political institutions in localizing the SDGs. By exploring localization of the 2030 Agenda in a concrete political context, we go beyond prior research that mainly studies interlinkages and discourses underpinning the agenda. Purpose This article explores political qualities of localization processes through three analytical concepts that bring such qualities to the fore—legitimacy, responsibility and accountability. We investigate localization attempts with regard to the 2030 Agenda in Tanzania, aiming to identify drivers and obstacles of localization. Approaches and Methods The article provides an explorative case study based on policy document review and 28 semi‐structured interviews with civil servants, parliamentarians, representatives from civil society organizations, the UN and other international agencies in Dar es Salaam and Dodoma between 2017 and 2019. Findings Elements of localization are policy alignment at the national level, work with statistics and indicators, and awareness creation among a variety of actors. Drivers of localization are the government, civil society organizations, the UN, members of parliament and demands for review at the UN High‐level Political Forum. Obstacles to localization are unclear allocation of responsibility, insufficient co‐ordination, high turnaround of people in key positions, a lack of data availability, low awareness of the SDGs among citizens, a shortage of resources and shrinking democratic space. Policy Implications We posit that a clear allocation of responsibility facilitates implementation and ensuing accountability measures. For localization to occur, knowledge of the SDGs must reach beyond a limited circle of elites. Moreover, it is important to acknowledge that sustainable development is a politically charged field. Political institutions at all levels should therefore be central arenas for debating and adopting the 2030 Agenda as part of its localization.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Jönsson & Magdalena Bexell, 2021. "Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals: The case of Tanzania," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(2), pages 181-196, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:39:y:2021:i:2:p:181-196
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12497
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelina Fisher & Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, 2019. "Introduction—Data, Knowledge, Politics and Localizing the SDGs," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 375-385, October.
    2. Sarah Cummings & Barbara Regeer & Leah de Haan & Marjolein Zweekhorst & Joske Bunders, 2018. "Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on knowledge and the knowledge society within the Sustainable Development Goals," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(6), pages 727-742, October.
    3. Sergio Belda-Miquel & Alejandra Boni & Carola Calabuig, 2019. "SDG Localisation and Decentralised Development Aid: Exploring Opposing Discourses and Practices in Valencia's Aid Sector," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 386-402, October.
    4. Chimhowu, Admos O. & Hulme, David & Munro, Lauchlan T., 2019. "The ‘New’ national development planning and global development goals: Processes and partnerships," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-89.
    5. Judith G. Kelley & Beth A. Simmons, 2015. "Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 55-70, January.
    6. United Nations, 2016. "The Sustainable Development Goals 2016," Working Papers id:11456, eSocialSciences.
    7. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    8. Raymond Saner & Lichia Yiu & Melanie Nguyen, 2020. "Monitoring the SDGs: Digital and social technologies to ensure citizen participation, inclusiveness and transparency," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(4), pages 483-500, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clement, Jessica & Ruysschaert, Benoit & Crutzen, Nathalie, 2023. "Smart city strategies – A driver for the localization of the sustainable development goals?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Eunice Annan-Aggrey & Godwin Arku, 2023. "‘New Wine in Old Wineskins?’—Understanding the Framing of SDGs in the Local Government Context in Ghana," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 23(3), pages 229-245, July.
    3. Oda Hustad, 2023. "From global goal to local development policy: How partnerships as a policy idea changes through policy translation," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    4. Xinghua Feng & Yan Tang & Manyu Bi & Zeping Xiao & Yexi Zhong, 2022. "Analysis of Urban Resilience in Water Network Cities Based on Scale-Density-Morphology-Function (SDMF) Framework: A Case Study of Nanchang City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Xinghua Feng & Chunliang Xiu & Jianxin Li & Yexi Zhong, 2021. "Measuring the Evolution of Urban Resilience Based on the Exposure–Connectedness–Potential (ECP) Approach: A Case Study of Shenyang City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Gloria Novovic, 2022. "Can Agenda 2030 bring about “localization”? Policy limitations of Agenda 2030 in the broader global governance system," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(4), July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernanda Guedes & Alexandre Szklo & Pedro Rochedo & Frédéric Lantz & Leticia Magalar & Eveline Maria Vásquez Arroyo, 2018. "Climate-Energy-Water Nexus in Brazilian Oil Refineries," Working Papers hal-03188594, HAL.
    2. Tiantian Zhai, 2021. "Environmental Challenges, Opportunities, and Policy Implications to Materialize China’s Green Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Sonja JOVANOVIĆ, & Ivana Ilić, 2017. "The Most Important Goals Of Sustainable Development And Environmental Policy In The European Union And The Western Balkan Countries," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(1), pages 1-1, January.
    4. Oier Imaz & Andoni Eizagirre, 2020. "Responsible Innovation for Sustainable Development Goals in Business: An Agenda for Cooperative Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Sarah Cummings & Anastasia‐Alithia Seferiadis & Leah de Haan, 2020. "Getting down to business? Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on the private sector in sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 759-771, July.
    6. Doanh-Ngan-Mac Do & Linh-Khanh Hoang & Cuong-Minh Le & Trung Tran, 2020. "A Human Rights-Based Approach in Implementing Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) for Ethnic Minorities in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. J.-P. Cling & S. Eghbal-Teherani & M. Orzoni & C. Plateau, 2019. "The Differences between EU Countries for Sustainable Development Indicators: It is (mainly) the Economy!," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2019-06, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    8. Jiehui Yuan & Xunmin Ou & Gehua Wang, 2017. "Establishing a Framework to Evaluate the Effect of Energy Countermeasures Tackling Climate Change and Air Pollution: The Example of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, September.
    9. David Horan, 2022. "Towards a Portfolio Approach: Partnerships for Sustainable Transformations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(1), pages 160-170, February.
    10. Oda Hustad, 2023. "From global goal to local development policy: How partnerships as a policy idea changes through policy translation," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    11. Lopes, C. & Lisboa, V. & Carvalho, J. & Mateus, A. & Martins, L., 2018. "Challenges to access and safeguard mineral resources for society: A case study of kaolin in Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 263-284.
    12. Cheng-Yu Yu, 2018. "An Application of Sustainable Development in Indigenous People’s Revival: The History of an Indigenous Tribe’s Struggle in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Puppala, Harish & Ahuja, Jaya & Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan & Peddinti, Pranav R T, 2023. "New technology adoption in rural areas of emerging economies: The case of rainwater harvesting systems in India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    14. Rosana Maria Kral & Rizki Maftukhah & Axel Mentler & Murtiningrum Murtiningrum & Ngadisih Ngadisih & Katharina Maria Keiblinger, 2020. "Citizen Science in the Field: Co-experimentation at Pilot Scale for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Sofia Gruskin & Laura Ferguson & Shubha Kumar & Alexandra Nicholson & Moazzam Ali & Rajat Khosla, 2017. "A novel methodology for strengthening human rights based monitoring in public health: Family planning indicators as an illustrative example," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Matthias Winfried Kleespies & Paul Wilhelm Dierkes, 2022. "The importance of the Sustainable Development Goals to students of environmental and sustainability studies—a global survey in 41 countries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Lucia Mancini & Philip Nuss, 2020. "Responsible Materials Management for a Resource-Efficient and Low-Carbon Society," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    20. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:39:y:2021:i:2:p:181-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.