IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i4p5919-5928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does the USA Perform in the Sustainable Development Goals: A Northern Hemisphere Peer‐Based Index

Author

Listed:
  • Enda Murphy
  • Ethan Murphy
  • Jeffrey D. Sachs
  • Patrick P. Walsh

Abstract

Good quality data and reporting systems are fundamental to the achievement of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the United States of America (USA) currently lacks tools to adequately assess national SDG performance. This paper addresses this critical gap and presents a novel index methodology assessing the USA's performance in 137 SDG indicators relative to its best and worst‐performing Northern Hemisphere peers. A distinct taxonomy classification system measures national performance across critical SDG dimensions. Performance in the entire SDGs is assessed through a composite index representing the most comprehensive assessment of USA's national SDG performance to date. This index holds significant potential for policymakers and stakeholders alike. Its indicator‐based approach facilitates the highly accurate identification of “problem areas”, thus informing the development of tailored national policy. Its unique peer‐based normalization methodology creates a positive peer‐learning environment, which can catalyze the development of efficient SDG policy. In providing the means by which accountability might be reintroduced into the national governance system, the index has the potential to increase SDG ownership in the USA.

Suggested Citation

  • Enda Murphy & Ethan Murphy & Jeffrey D. Sachs & Patrick P. Walsh, 2025. "How Does the USA Perform in the Sustainable Development Goals: A Northern Hemisphere Peer‐Based Index," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 5919-5928, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:5919-5928
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3445
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:5919-5928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.