IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i4p2869-2898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging environmental, social, and governance strategies for sustainable tannery solid waste management towards achieving sustainable development goals

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Abdul Moktadir
  • Jingzheng Ren

Abstract

Tannery solid waste (TSW) management is vital for promoting sustainable development in the leather industry. However, sustainable management of TSW is challenging as it contains hazardous chemicals. Implementing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices can support managing TSW towards achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, it is not easy to implement ESG practices for TSW management since numerous challenges exist in the system. To assist TSW management through ESG implementation, it is imperative to investigate the interactions among challenges and mitigation strategies. However, the existing decision‐making models cannot deal with the uncertainty and vagueness on a border scale during interaction evaluation and alternatives ranking. Additionally, there is a shortage of scientific works on ESG practices in emerging economies. Therefore, this study, for the first time, offers an integrated novel Dombi t‐norm and Dombi t‐conorm grounded interval valued Fermatean fuzzy sets (IVFFSs) Delphi, an extended IVFFSs‐weighted influence non‐liner Gause system (WINGS), and novel IVFFSs‐TODIM approach which is utterly lacking in the present literature. Also, the study offers a strategic roadmap to understand the interlinkage of findings with SDGs. The results of the IVFFSs‐WINGS analysis confirmed that the “Lack of solid waste management policy” is the most critical challenge for ESG implementation. Further, IVFFSs‐TODIM analysis confirmed that the “Policy development for TSW management complying with ESG and SDGs” is the top ESG challenges mitigation strategy for TSW management. The study's findings will provide guidance for government agencies, policymakers, and relevant stakeholders of the emerging economies tannery industry for successful implementation of ESG practices, thus helping to achieve SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Abdul Moktadir & Jingzheng Ren, 2024. "Leveraging environmental, social, and governance strategies for sustainable tannery solid waste management towards achieving sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 2869-2898, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:2869-2898
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2812
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Welford & Stephen Frost, 2006. "Corporate social responsibility in Asian supply chains," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 166-176, July.
    2. Artie W. Ng & Tiffany Cheng Han Leung & Tao-Wang Yu & Charles H. Cho & Tai Ming Wut, 2023. "Disparities in ESG reporting by emerging Chinese enterprises: evidence from a global financial center," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 343-368, February.
    3. Krishna Raj Bhandari & Mikko Ranta & Jari Salo, 2022. "The resource‐based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm's embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1525-1537, May.
    4. Md. Abdul Moktadir & Anil Kumar & Syed Mithun Ali & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Razia Sultana & Jafar Rezaei, 2020. "Critical success factors for a circular economy: Implications for business strategy and the environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3611-3635, December.
    5. Claudio Sassanelli & Sergio Terzi, 2022. "The D-BEST Reference Model: A Flexible and Sustainable Support for the Digital Transformation of Small and Medium Enterprises," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(3), pages 345-370, September.
    6. Shu, Hao & Tan, Weiqiang, 2023. "Does carbon control policy risk affect corporate ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Idiano D'Adamo & Alessandro Dell'Aguzzo & Marco Pruckner, 2024. "Residential photovoltaic and energy storage systems for sustainable development: An economic analysis applied to incentive mechanisms," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 84-100, February.
    8. Peter Hills & Jacqueline Lam & Richard Welford, 2004. "Business, environmental reform and technological innovation in Hong Kong," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 223-234, July.
    9. Richard Welford, 1992. "Linking quality and the environment: A strategy for the implementation of environmental management systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 25-34, March.
    10. Dogru, Tarik & Akyildirim, Erdinc & Cepni, Oguzhan & Ozdemir, Ozgur & Sharma, Abhinav & Yilmaz, Muhammed Hasan, 2022. "The effect of environmental, social and governance risks," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    11. Chitra Sriyani De Silva Lokuwaduge & Kumudini Heenetigala, 2017. "Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 438-450, May.
    12. Michnik, Jerzy, 2013. "Weighted Influence Non-linear Gauge System (WINGS) – An analysis method for the systems of interrelated components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 536-544.
    13. Jerzy Michnik, 2018. "The WINGS method with multiple networks and its application to innovation projects selection," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 105-126.
    14. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    15. Simone Sehnem & Deivsson Souza Bispo & Jacinto Orlando João & Maria Aparecida Lima de Souza & Oscar Bertoglio & Rogério Ciotti & Simone Machado Deon, 2022. "Upscaling circular economy in foodtechs businesses in emergent countries: Towards sustainable development through natural resource based view," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1200-1221, October.
    16. Md. Rayhan Sarker & Md. Abdul Moktadir & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez-Gonzalez, 2021. "Social Sustainability Challenges Towards Flexible Supply Chain Management: Post-COVID-19 Perspective," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 199-218, December.
    17. DasGupta, Ranjan & Roy, Arup, 2023. "Firm environmental, social, governance and financial performance relationship contradictions: Insights from institutional environment mediation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Humaira Nafisa Ahmed & Sayem Ahmed & Muztoba Ahmad Khan & Syed Mithun Ali, 2022. "Sustainable supply chain in emerging economies during and post COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review and future research directions," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(9), pages 2472-2498, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cem Işık & Serdar Ongan & Hasibul Islam & Stefania Pinzon & Gul Jabeen, 2024. "Navigating sustainability: Unveiling the interconnected dynamics of ESG factors and SDGs in BRICS‐11," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5437-5451, October.
    2. Cem Işık & Serdar Ongan & Hasibul Islam & Gul Jabeen & Stefania Pinzon, 2024. "Is economic growth in East Asia pacific and South Asia ESG factors based and aligned growth?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4455-4468, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tavana, Madjid & Khalili Nasr, Arash & Mina, Hassan & Michnik, Jerzy, 2022. "A private sustainable partner selection model for green public-private partnerships and regional economic development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Shamekhi Amiri, Alireza & Torabi, S. Ali & Tavana, Madjid, 2025. "An assessment of the prominence and total engagement metrics for ranking interdependent attributes in DEMATEL and WINGS," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    3. Jerzy Michnik & Artur Grabowski, 2020. "Modeling Uncertainty in the Wings Method Using Interval Arithmetic," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 221-240, January.
    4. Vinay Surendra Yadav & Abhijit Majumdar, 2024. "What impedes digital twin from revolutionizing agro-food supply chain? Analysis of barriers and strategy development for mitigation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 711-727, June.
    5. Palash Saha & Subrata Talapatra & H. M. Belal & Victoria Jackson, 2022. "Unleashing the Potential of the TQM and Industry 4.0 to Achieve Sustainability Performance in the Context of a Developing Country," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 495-513, December.
    6. Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Jacopo Piccioni & Paolo Rosa, 2023. "The Role of Automotive Flexibility in Supporting the Diffusion of Sustainable Mobility Initiatives: A Stakeholder Attitudes Assessment," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 459-481, September.
    7. Dariusz Banaś & Jerzy Michnik, 2019. "Evaluation of the Impact of Strategic Offers on the Financial and Strategic Health of the Company—A Soft System Dynamics Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Pham, Linh & Nguyen, Thanh Thi Phuong, 2023. "Does country sustainability improve firm ESG reporting transparency? The moderating role of firm industry and CSR engagement," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Ye‐Cheng Wang & Yi‐Pin Fan & Yuan‐Wei Du, 2023. "Ecological development practices of marine ranching enterprises in China: Case studies of early movers," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3207-3223, October.
    10. Anna Adamus-Matuszyńska & Jerzy Michnik & Grzegorz Polok, 2019. "A Systemic Approach to City Image Building. The Case of Katowice City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Annarita Colasante & Idiano D'Adamo & Alfredo De Massis & Simone Italiano, 2024. "An exploratory study of stakeholder views on the sustainable development of mountain tourism," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3722-3735, August.
    12. Rohit Agrawal & Vishal A. Wankhede & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra, 2021. "Analysing the roadblocks of circular economy adoption in the automobile sector: Reducing waste and environmental perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1051-1066, February.
    13. Fengxue Yin & Yanling Xiao & Rui Cao & Jianhua Zhang, 2023. "Impacts of ESG Disclosure on Corporate Carbon Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavy Pollution Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Andrew Ngawenja Mzembe & Adam Lindgreen & François Maon & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2016. "Investigating the Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Tea Supply Chain: A Case Study of Eastern Produce Limited in Malawi," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 165-178, May.
    15. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    16. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Ales Mihelic, 2022. "Designing a circular business strategy: 7 years of evolution at a large washing machine manufacturer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1030-1041, March.
    17. Md Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Eijaz Ahmed Khan & A. K. M. Shakil Mahmud, 2024. "A Decision Support Model for Barriers and Optimal Strategy Design in Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chain Management," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(3), pages 467-486, September.
    18. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Ramona Zharfpeykan, 2021. "Representative account or greenwashing? Voluntary sustainability reports in Australia's mining/metals and financial services industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2209-2223, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:2869-2898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.