IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v44y2024i3p170-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How perceived risks in interorganizational collaboration shape disaster response strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Minsun Song
  • Joungyoon Hwang
  • Namhoon Ki

Abstract

Interorganizational collaboration is a means, through which governments to effectively respond to disasters. However, the extent to which collaboration risks embedded in interorganizational relationships shape such collaborative arrangements largely remains unanswered. This study examined the impact of collaboration risks as perceived by organizational representatives with regard to emergency management (EM). To this end, we conducted an EM survey in Seoul in 2015 and analyzed the data using a quadratic assignment procedure logistic regression. The dyadic network analytic results demonstrated that the aggregate risks as perceived by paired organizations are negatively associated with the establishment of collaboration ties. In contrast, a significant disparity in the perceived risk levels between paired organizations promotes collaborative network arrangements; when one party perceives substantially lower collaboration risks relative to the other, it can create a favorable condition for both parties to initiate interorganizational collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Minsun Song & Joungyoon Hwang & Namhoon Ki, 2024. "How perceived risks in interorganizational collaboration shape disaster response strategies," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(3), pages 170-184, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:44:y:2024:i:3:p:170-184
    DOI: 10.1002/pad.2048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2048
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pad.2048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minsun Song & Kyujin Jung & Namhoon Ki & Richard C Feiock, 2020. "Testing structural and relational embeddedness in collaboration risk," Rationality and Society, , vol. 32(1), pages 67-92, February.
    2. Feng, Bo & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Ma, Jian, 2010. "A method for partner selection of codevelopment alliances using individual and collaborative utilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 159-170, March.
    3. Podolny, Joel M & Phillips, Damon J, 1996. "The Dynamics of Organizational Status," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(2), pages 453-471.
    4. Qian Hu & Naim Kapucu, 2016. "Information Communication Technology Utilization for Effective Emergency Management Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 323-348, March.
    5. Chang-Gyu Kwak & Namhoon Ki & Suk-Joon Hwang, 2021. "Selective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Elisabeth R. Gerber & Adam Douglas Henry & Mark Lubell, 2013. "Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 598-610, July.
    7. Paul Smoke & Mehmet Serkan Tosun & Serdar Yilmaz, 2023. "Subnational government responses to the Covid‐19 pandemic: Expectations, realities and lessons for the future," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(2), pages 97-105, May.
    8. Naon Min & Namhoon Ki & Taewon Yoon, 2021. "Public service motivation, job satisfaction, and the moderating effect of employment sector: a meta-analysis," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 135-155, April.
    9. Kyujin Jung & Minsun Song, 2015. "Linking emergency management networks to disaster resilience: bonding and bridging strategy in hierarchical or horizontal collaboration networks," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1465-1483, July.
    10. Minsun Song, 2018. "Does having a strong commitment matter in building sustainable networks?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 551-564, March.
    11. Namhoon Ki, 2021. "Public service motivation and government officials’ willingness to learn in public sector benchmarking process," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 610-632, April.
    12. Ohad Ref & Zur Shapira, 2017. "Entering new markets: The effect of performance feedback near aspiration and well below and above it," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(7), pages 1416-1434, July.
    13. David Dekker & David Krackhardt & Tom Snijders, 2007. "Sensitivity of MRQAP Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 563-581, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Du & Yingbin Feng & Li Yaning Tang & Wei Kang & Wei Lu, 2020. "Networks in disaster emergency management: a systematic review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Minsun Song, 2018. "Does having a strong commitment matter in building sustainable networks?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 551-564, March.
    3. Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, 2022. "Interpretive structural modelling of inter-agency collaboration risk in public safety networks," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1193-1221, June.
    4. Yingzhao Xiao & Liuyang Xue & David Ahlstrom & Chundong Zheng & Xiling Hao, 2024. "To Conform or Not to Conform? The Role of Social Status and Firm Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 655-677, September.
    5. Soyoung Kim & Woo-Je Kim & Richard Clark Feiock, 2021. "An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Hannah Carver & Tracey Price & Danilo Falzon & Peter McCulloch & Tessa Parkes, 2022. "Stress and Wellbeing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Frontline Homelessness Services Staff Experiences in Scotland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Chenxi Lian & Jian Wang, 2024. "Multi-actor cooperation for emergency supply support: a simulation of behavior diffusion based on social networks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(2), pages 1241-1262, January.
    8. David M. Waguespack & Robert Salomon, 2016. "Quality, Subjectivity, and Sustained Superior Performance at the Olympic Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 286-300, January.
    9. Dezhong Duan & Qifan Xia, 2022. "From the United States to China? A trade perspective to reveal the structure and dynamics of global electronic‐telecommunications," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 823-847, June.
    10. Rui Xue & Gongming Qian & Zhengming Qian & Lee Li, 2021. "Entrepreneurs’ Implicit and Explicit Achievement Motives and Their Early International Commitment," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 91-121, March.
    11. de Oliveira Maciel, Cristiano & Netto, Raul Zanon Rocha, 2020. "Architectural agency in intra-organizational networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 489-497.
    12. Yildiz, H. Emre, 2016. "“Us vs. them” or “us over them”? On the roles of similarity and status in M&As," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 51-65.
    13. Fuentelsaz, Lucio & Garrido, Elisabet & Maicas, Juan P., 2020. "The effect of informal and formal institutions on foreign market entry selection and performance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(2).
    14. Starling David Hunter & Henrik Bentzen & Jan Taug, 2020. "On the “missing link” between formal organization and informal social structure," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Delgado García, Juan Bautista & De Quevedo Puente, Esther, 2016. "The complex link of city reputation and city performance. Results for fsQCA analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2830-2839.
    16. Natalia Levina & Manuel Arriaga, 2014. "Distinction and Status Production on User-Generated Content Platforms: Using Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Production to Understand Social Dynamics in Online Fields," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 468-488, September.
    17. Jörg Claussen & Christian Essling & Christian Peukert, 2018. "Demand variation, strategic flexibility and market entry: Evidence from the U.S. airline industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(11), pages 2877-2898, November.
    18. Pietro Previtali & Eugenio Salvati, 2021. "Area Social Plans and Local Governance of Interorganizational Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Isabell Stamm & Fabian Bernhard & Jan-Philipp Ahrens & Baris Istipliler, 2024. "Marriage: an institution you cannot disparage? Evidence on the marriage norms of entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 501-521, June.
    20. Matthew S. Bothner & Young-Kyu Kim & Edward Bishop Smith, 2012. "How Does Status Affect Performance? Status as an Asset vs. Status as a Liability in the PGA and NASCAR," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 416-433, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:44:y:2024:i:3:p:170-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.