IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i1p100-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring asymmetric dynamics of R&D spending and firm value nexus: Insights from panel autoregressive distributed lag analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Navjot Kaur
  • Balwinder Singh

Abstract

The present study aims to provide valuable insights into the impact of research and development (R&D) spending on firm value, considering both short‐term and long‐term dynamics while also considering any potential asymmetries in this relationship. This work is conducted using a sample of 185 listed Indian manufacturing firms over a time span of 18 years, that is, from 2006 to 2023. Both symmetric and asymmetric autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) are employed on a final sample of 3330 firm‐year observations to unravel the intricacies of the aforementioned relationship. Based on the empirical findings from the symmetric ARDL model, it is revealed that R&D spending positively impacts the value of firms in the long run while showing no significant effect in the short run. On the contrary, the results from the asymmetric ARDL model present interesting insights. In the short run, positive (negative) changes in R&D spending appear to reduce (increase) the value of firms. However, in the long run, positive (negative) changes tend to increase (reduce) the value of companies. The key differentiator of the study is the identification of the asymmetrical impact of R&D spending on firm value. The paper argues that while R&D spending does influence firm value, the relationship between them is not inherently symmetrical. In particular, the impact of R&D spending changes from being statistically insignificant when using symmetric ARDL estimation to becoming significant when applying asymmetrical estimation methods. The findings remain largely consistent across different subsamples and alternative measurements of variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Navjot Kaur & Balwinder Singh, 2025. "Exploring asymmetric dynamics of R&D spending and firm value nexus: Insights from panel autoregressive distributed lag analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 100-114, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:1:p:100-114
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4362
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thornton, Daniel L & Batten, Dallas S, 1985. "Lag-Length Selection and Tests of Granger Causality between Money and Income," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 17(2), pages 164-178, May.
    2. Namchul Shin & Kenneth L. Kraemer & Jason Dedrick, 2017. "R&D and firm performance in the semiconductor industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 280-297, April.
    3. Granger, Clive W.J. & YOON, GAWON, 2002. "Hidden Cointegration," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt9qn5f61j, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    4. Yasemin Y. Kor & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2005. "How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm‐level performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 489-496, May.
    5. António Afonso & Eduardo Rodrigues, 2024. "Is public investment in construction and in R&D, growth enhancing? A PVAR approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(24), pages 2875-2899, May.
    6. Toshiya Hatano, 2010. "Crowding - in Effect of Public Investment on Private Investment," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 6(1), pages 105-120, February.
    7. Markus Simeth & Michele Cincera, 2016. "Corporate Science, Innovation, and Firm Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 1970-1981, July.
    8. Ruchita Verma & Dhanraj Sharma & Priyanka, 2022. "Relationship among Environmental Performance, R&D Expenditure and Financial Performance: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(6), pages 1316-1335, December.
    9. Del Monte, Alfredo & Papagni, Erasmo, 2003. "R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1003-1014, June.
    10. Geeta Duppati & Albert Sune & Navajyoti Samanta, 2017. "Corporate governance, research and development volatility and firm performance - Evidence from Spain and Ireland," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1317117-131, January.
    11. Md. Musfiqur Rahman & Md. Shuvo Howlader, 2022. "The impact of research and development expenditure on firm performance and firm value: evidence from a South Asian emerging economy," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(4), pages 825-845, May.
    12. Eyup Dogan & Fahri Seker & Serap Bulbul, 2017. "Investigating the impacts of energy consumption, real GDP, tourism and trade on CO2 emissions by accounting for cross-sectional dependence: A panel study of OECD countries," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(16), pages 1701-1719, December.
    13. Peter C. B. Phillips & Zhijie Xiao, 1998. "A Primer on Unit Root Testing," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 423-470, December.
    14. Anish Purkayastha & Vishal K. Gupta, 2023. "Business group affiliation and entrepreneurial orientation: Contingent effect of level of internationalization and firm’s performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 847-876, June.
    15. Missaka Warusawitharana, 2015. "Research and development, profits, and firm value: A structural estimation," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 6(2), pages 531-565, July.
    16. Mudambi, Ram & Swift, Tim, 2011. "Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 429-440, April.
    17. Hirschey, Mark, 1982. "Intangible Capital Aspects of Advertising and R&D Expenditures," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 375-390, June.
    18. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-07-2021-0196 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Nunes, Paulo Maçãs & Serrasqueiro, Zélia & Leitão, João, 2012. "Is there a linear relationship between R&D intensity and growth? Empirical evidence of non-high-tech vs. high-tech SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 36-53.
    20. repec:bla:jecsur:v:12:y:1998:i:5:p:423-69 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Martinus Robert Hutauruk, 2024. "The effect of R&D expenditures on firm value with firm size moderation in an Indonesia palm oil company," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2317448-231, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navjot Kaur & Balwinder Singh, 2024. "Dynamics of resource allocation–firm performance relationship: Panel autoregressive distributed lag approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3663-3676, September.
    2. Baussola, Maurizio & Carvelli, Gianni, 2023. "Public and private investments: Long-run asymmetric effects in France and the US," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    3. P. S. Sephton, 2010. "Unit roots and purchasing power parity: another kick at the can," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(27), pages 3439-3453.
    4. Patel, Pankaj C. & Guedes, Maria João & Soares, Nuno & da Conceição Gonçalves, Vítor, 2018. "Strength of the association between R&D volatility and firm growth: The roles of corporate governance and tangible asset volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 282-288.
    5. Kseniia Boiko, 2022. "R&D activity and firm performance: mapping the field," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 1051-1087, December.
    6. Dong, Xiao & Yu, Mingzhe, 2023. "Does FinTech development facilitate firms' innovation? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Carvelli, Gianni, 2024. "The dynamic effects of public investments on private capital formation: Modelling a heterogeneous asymmetric cointegration with unobserved global factors," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Taoufik Elkemali & Aymen Ben Rejeb, 2015. "R&D Intensity and Financing Decisions: Evidence from European Firms," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(2), pages 1042-1055.
    9. Xiang, Erwei & Gasbarro, Dominic & Cullen, Grant & Ruan, Wenjuan, 2020. "Does R&D expenditure volatility affect stock return?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    10. Alicia Rodríguez & María Jesús Nieto, 2016. "Does R&D offshoring lead to SME growth? Different governance modes and the mediating role of innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1734-1753, August.
    11. Ming-Liang Yeh & Hsiao-Ping Chu & Peter Sher & Yi-Chia Chiu, 2010. "R&D intensity, firm performance and the identification of the threshold: fresh evidence from the panel threshold regression model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 389-401.
    12. Konshik Kim, 2018. "DIMINISHING RETURNS TO R&D INVESTMENT ON INNOVATION IN MANUFACTURING SMEs: DO THE TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY OF INDUSTRY MATTER?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-27, October.
    13. Karasoy, Alper, 2022. "Is innovative technology a solution to Japan's long-run energy insecurity? Dynamic evidence from the linear and nonlinear methods," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Muhammad Shahbaz & Vassilios G. Papavassiliou & Amine Lahiani & David Roubaud, 2023. "Are we moving towards decarbonisation of the global economy? Lessons from the distant past to the present," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2620-2634, July.
    15. Jani Bekő, 2003. "Causality between exports and economic growth: empirical estimates for slovenia," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(2), pages 169-186.
    16. Áron TÖRÖK & József TÓTH, 2013. "Open characters of innovation management in the Hungarian wine industry," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(9), pages 430-438.
    17. Camgöz, Mevlüt & Topal, Mehmet Hanefi, 2022. "Identifying the asymmetric price dynamics of Islamic equities: Implications for international investors," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    18. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    19. İbrahim Özmen & Mihai Mutascu, 2024. "Public Debt and Growth: New Insights," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8706-8736, June.
    20. Z. Jun Lin & Shengqiang Liu & Fangcheng Sun, 2017. "The Impact of Financing Constraints and Agency Costs on Corporate R&D Investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 3-42, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:1:p:100-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.