IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v44y2023i2p1215-1227.html

Partial privatization with endogenous choice of strategic variable

Author

Listed:
  • José Méndez‐Naya
  • José A. Novo‐Peteiro

Abstract

This paper analyzes the optimal privatization policy when firms endogenously choose their strategic variable. The level of privatization is shown to determine: (i) the choice of strategic variable, whereby an asymmetric equilibrium could emerge (either Cournot–Bertrand or Bertrand–Cournot); (ii) the stability of equilibrium when the partially privatized firm and the private firm choose quantity and price respectively as the strategic variable; and (iii) the level of welfare, whereby Cournot–Cournot and Bertrand–Cournot games could lead to a greater welfare than the Bertrand–Bertrand model.

Suggested Citation

  • José Méndez‐Naya & José A. Novo‐Peteiro, 2023. "Partial privatization with endogenous choice of strategic variable," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1215-1227, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:2:p:1215-1227
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3743
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anant, T. C. A. & Basu, Kaushik & Mukherji, Badal, 1995. "A model of monopoly with strategic government intervention," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 25-43, May.
    2. Gregory S. Amacher & Arun S. Malik, 2002. "Pollution Taxes When Firms Choose Technologies," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(4), pages 891-906, April.
    3. Gregory S. Amacher & Arun S. Malik, 2002. "Pollution Taxes When Firms Choose Technologies," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 68(4), pages 891-906, April.
    4. Xu, Lili & Cho, Sumi & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2016. "Emission tax and optimal privatization in Cournot–Bertrand comparison," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 73-82.
    5. Dixit, Avinash K, 1986. "Comparative Statics for Oligopoly," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 27(1), pages 107-122, February.
    6. Nakamura, Yasuhiko, 2015. "Price versus quantity in a mixed duopoly: The case of relative profit maximization," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 37-43.
    7. Kenji Fujiwara, 2007. "Partial Privatization in a Differentiated Mixed Oligopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 51-65, September.
    8. Toshihiro Matsumura & Akira Ogawa, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility or Payoff Asymmetry? A Study of an Endogenous Timing Game," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 81(2), pages 457-473, October.
    9. Scrimitore, Marcella, 2013. "Price or quantity? The strategic choice of subsidized firms in a mixed duopoly," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 337-341.
    10. Carmichael, Calum M., 1987. "The control of export credit subsidies and its welfare consequences," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1-2), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Wang, Chia-Chi & Chiou, Jiunn-Rong, 2018. "Optimal privatization policy with Bertrand competition," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 538-546.
    12. Michael Kopel, 2015. "Price and Quantity Contracts in a Mixed Duopoly with a Socially Concerned Firm," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(8), pages 559-566, December.
    13. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter.
    14. Ghosh, Arghya & Mitra, Manipushpak, 2010. "Comparing Bertrand and Cournot in mixed markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 72-74, November.
    15. Matsumura, Toshihiro & Ogawa, Akira, 2012. "Price versus quantity in a mixed duopoly," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 174-177.
    16. Brander, James A., 1995. "Strategic trade policy," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 27, pages 1395-1455, Elsevier.
    17. Seung-Leul Kim & Sang-Ho Lee & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 67-89, September.
    18. Hackner, Jonas, 2000. "A Note on Price and Quantity Competition in Differentiated Oligopolies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 233-239, August.
    19. Koji Ishibashi & Toyokazu Kaneko, 2008. "Partial privatization in mixed duopoly with price and quality competition," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 213-231, December.
    20. Amarjyoti Mahanta, 2019. "Endogenous strategic variable in a mixed duopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 47-65, September.
    21. Piercarlo Zanchettin, 2006. "Differentiated Duopoly with Asymmetric Costs," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 999-1015, December.
    22. Matsumura, Toshihiro, 1998. "Partial privatization in mixed duopoly," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 473-483, December.
    23. Toshihiro Matsumura & Osamu Kanda, 2005. "Mixed Oligopoly at Free Entry Markets," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 27-48, February.
    24. Yoshihiro Tomaru & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2018. "Optimal Privatization and Subsidization Policies in a Mixed Duopoly: Relevance of a Cost Gap," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 174(4), pages 689-706, December.
    25. Toshihiro Matsumura & Akira Ogawa, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility or Payoff Asymmetry? A Study of an Endogenous Timing Game," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 81(2), pages 457-473, October.
    26. Victor J. Tremblay & Carol Horton Tremblay & Kosin Isariyawongse, 2013. "Endogenous Timing And Strategic Choice: The Cournot-Bertrand Model," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(4), pages 332-342, October.
    27. Tremblay, Carol Horton & Tremblay, Victor J., 2011. "The Cournot-Bertrand model and the degree of product differentiation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 233-235, June.
    28. Carol Horton Tremblay & Victor J. Tremblay, 2019. "Oligopoly Games And The Cournot–Bertrand Model: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 1555-1577, December.
    29. Kangsik Choi, 2019. "Price And Quantity Competition With Asymmetric Costs In A Mixed Duopoly: A Technical Note," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 33-46, January.
    30. Junichi Haraguchi & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2016. "Cournot–Bertrand comparison in a mixed oligopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 117-136, March.
    31. Nakamura, Tamotsu & Takami, Hiroyuki, 2015. "Nash bargaining and partial privatization in mixed oligopoly," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 315-321.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duarte Brito & Margarida Catalão-Lopes, 2023. "Cournot–Bertrand endogenous behavior in a differentiated oligopoly with entry deterrence," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 55-78, July.
    2. Tai-Liang Chen & Yuxiang Zou, 2022. "Product differentiation, privatization commitment and profitability comparisons," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Xu, Lili & Cho, Sumi & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2016. "Emission tax and optimal privatization in Cournot–Bertrand comparison," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 73-82.
    4. Paul, Arindam & De, Parikshit, 2022. "Reversal of Bertrand-Cournot Ranking for Optimal Privatization Level," MPRA Paper 116272, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Feb 2023.
    5. Bárcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos & Garzón, María Begoña & Sagasta, Amagoia, 2024. "Partial privatization and the degree of corporate social responsibility of private investors," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Wang, Chia-Chi & Chiou, Jiunn-Rong, 2018. "Optimal privatization policy with Bertrand competition," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 538-546.
    7. Manipushpak Mitra & Rupayan Pal & Arindam Paul & P. M. Sharada, 2020. "Equilibrium Coexistence of Public and Private Firms and the Plausibility of Price Competition," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 176(2), pages 217-242.
    8. Xia Wang & Tingting Tan & Mingqing Xing, 2022. "Environmental awareness of the private firm and optimal privatization in a mixed duopoly," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 4055-4063, December.
    9. Xu, Lili & Fan, Xinying & Luan, Weixin, 2020. "Strategic corporate social responsibility of high-speed rail in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Xingtang Wang & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility, vertical product differentiation, and privatization policy," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 403-425, April.
    11. Scrimitore, Marcella, 2011. "Profitability in Cournot and Bertrand Mixed Markets under Endogenous Objectives," MPRA Paper 35643, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Lee, Sang-Ho & Matsumura, Toshihiro & Sato, Susumu, 2017. "A New Approach to Free Entry Markets in Mixed Oligopolies: Welfare Implications," MPRA Paper 76450, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Xu, Lili & Chen, Yuyan & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2022. "Emission tax and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a Cournot–Bertrand comparison," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Jiaqi Chen & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2023. "Cournot–Bertrand comparisons under R&D competition: Output versus R&D subsidies," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(1), pages 77-100, March.
    15. Luciano Fanti & Nicola Meccheri, 2015. "On the Cournot–Bertrand Profit Differential and the Structure of Unionisation in a Managerial Duopoly," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 266-287, December.
    16. Rupayan Pal, "undated". "The Cournot-Bertrand profit differential: A Reversal result in network goods duopoly," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2013-014, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    17. Ding Chen & Leonard F. S. Wang & Ji Sun, 2023. "Does CSR influence privatization wave?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1088-1097, March.
    18. Seung-Leul Kim & Sang-Ho Lee & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 67-89, September.
    19. Nguyen, Xuan, 2015. "On the efficiency of private and state-owned enterprises in mixed markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 130-137.
    20. Junichi Haraguchi & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2020. "Endogenous public and private leadership with diverging social and private marginal costs," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(5), pages 699-730, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:2:p:1215-1227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.