IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i23-24p4582-4594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care

Author

Listed:
  • Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry
  • Nahed Alquwez
  • Joseph Almazan
  • Ibrahim Mohammed Namis
  • Jonas Preposi Cruz

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care. Background Recent evidence describes workplace incivility as a serious concern in the healthcare setting worldwide. Exposure to workplace incivility can alter a nurse's behaviour, thought process and perspective towards the nursing profession. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether workplace incivility might be associated with the quality of nursing care in Saudi Arabia. Design A quantitative and cross‐sectional study. Method A survey was carried out amongst 378 nurses in two government hospitals in Saudi Arabia from February 2018–May 2018 using the Nurse Incivility and quality of nursing care scales. Multivariate multiple regression was performed to investigate the influence of the uncivil experiences of nurses from different sources on the different aspects of quality of nursing care. The study adhered to STROBE guideline (see Appendix S1). Results The overall mean of the quality of nursing care scale was 3.14 (SD = 0.66) from a scale of 1–5, with patient satisfaction receiving the highest mean dimension (mean = 3.27, SD = 0.72) and health promotion the lowest mean dimension (mean = 3.08, SD = 0.74). Experience in the present hospital and the hospital were associated with the overall quality of nursing care. General and nurse incivility exerted a multivariate effect on overall quality of nursing care and its different dimensions. Conclusion General incivility and nurse incivility were found to negatively impact quality of nursing care and its different dimensions. Relevance to clinical practice Stronger policies geared towards eliminating workplace incivility should be implemented as uncivil acts can lead to poor quality of nursing care. Nurse administrators and nurses should be pro‐active in recognising, preventing, approaching, reporting and intervening with uncivil acts in the hospital to protect these workers from these types of behaviours and avoid their negative impacts on patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Nahed Alquwez & Joseph Almazan & Ibrahim Mohammed Namis & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4582-4594, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4582-4594
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15051
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2017. "Quality of life and its influence on clinical competence among nurses: a self‐reported study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 388-399, February.
    2. Jonas Preposi Cruz & Darren Neil C Cabrera & Only D Hufana & Nahed Alquwez & Joseph Almazan, 2018. "Optimism, proactive coping and quality of life among nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2098-2108, May.
    3. Haizhen Lin, 2014. "Revisiting the relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing homes: An instrumental variables approach," Working Papers 2014-01, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    4. Lin, Haizhen, 2014. "Revisiting the relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing homes: An instrumental variables approach," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 13-24.
    5. Atallah Alenezi & Ramon Perley M. Pandaan & Joseph U. Almazan & Isabelita N. Pandaan & Franklyn S. Casison & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Clinical practitioners' perception of the dimensions of patient safety culture in a government hospital: A one‐sample correlational survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4496-4503, December.
    6. Paul L Delamater & Joseph P Messina & Sue C Grady & Vince WinklerPrins & Ashton M Shortridge, 2013. "Do More Hospital Beds Lead to Higher Hospitalization Rates? A Spatial Examination of Roemer’s Law," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Nahed Alquwez & Joseph Almazan & Ibrahim Mohammed Namis & Rainier C. Moreno‐Lacalle & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Workplace incivility and its influence on professional quality of life among nurses from multicultural background: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2553-2564, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John R. Bowblis & Andrew Ghattas, 2017. "The Impact of Minimum Quality Standard Regulations on Nursing Home Staffing, Quality, and Exit Decisions," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 50(1), pages 43-68, February.
    2. Gabriel A. Facchini Palma, 2020. "Low Staffing in the Maternity Ward: Keep Calm and Call the Surgeon," Working Papers wpdea2009, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    3. David A Brown & Nelson Ma & Jin Sug Yang & Nicole Sutton & Gillian McAllister & Deborah Parker & Olivia Rawlings-Way & Rachael L Lewis, 2023. "The impact of business model workforce configurations on value creation and value appropriation in the Australian aged care sector," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(3), pages 495-523, August.
    4. Chen, Gang & Ratcliffe, Julie & Milte, Rachel & Khadka, Jyoti & Kaambwa, Billingsley, 2021. "Quality of care experience in aged care: An Australia-Wide discrete choice experiment to elicit preference weights," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    5. David Bardey & Luigi Siciliani, 2021. "Nursing‐homes' competition and distributional implications when the market is two‐sided," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 472-500, May.
    6. Herr, A. & Saric, A., 2016. "The Welfare Effects of Single Rooms in German Nursing Homes: A Structural Approach," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 16/23, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    7. Marc Beltempo & Georges Bresson & Guy Lacroix, 2020. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Nosocomial Infections and Medical Accidents in a NICU," CIRANO Working Papers 2020s-21, CIRANO.
    8. Mommaerts, Corina & Truskinovsky, Yulya, 2020. "The cyclicality of informal care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Xavier Flawinne & Mathieu Lefebvre & Sergio Perelman & Pierre Pestieau & Jérôme Schoenmaeckers, 2023. "Nursing homes and mortality in Europe: Uncertain causality," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 134-154, January.
    10. Martin B. Hackmann, 2019. "Incentivizing Better Quality of Care: The Role of Medicaid and Competition in the Nursing Home Industry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(5), pages 1684-1716, May.
    11. Haizhen Lin, 2015. "Quality Choice And Market Structure: A Dynamic Analysis Of Nursing Home Oligopolies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1261-1290, November.
    12. Foster, Andrew D. & Lee, Yong Suk, 2015. "Staffing subsidies and the quality of care in nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 133-147.
    13. David, Guy & Kim, Kunhee Lucy, 2018. "The effect of workforce assignment on performance: Evidence from home health care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 26-45.
    14. John Bowblis, 2015. "The cost of regulation: More stringent staff regulations and nursing home financial performance," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 325-338, June.
    15. Schlage, Vanessa & Blankart, Carl Rudolf, 2016. "Does Direct-care Staffing Impact Nursing Home Outcomes? A Systematic Review," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(3), pages 291-318.
    16. Atul Gupta & Sabrina T Howell & Constantine Yannelis & Abhinav Gupta, 2021. "Does Private Equity Investment in Healthcare Benefit Patients? Evidence from Nursing Homes," Working Papers 2021-20, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    17. Martin Hackmann & Joerg Heining & Roman Klimke & Maria Polyakova & Holger Seibert, 2021. "General Equilibrium Effects of Insurance Expansions: Evidence from Long-Term Care Labor Markets," Upjohn Working Papers 21-357, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    18. Norton, E.C., 2016. "Health and Long-Term Care," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 951-989, Elsevier.
    19. Sean Shenghsiu Huang & John R. Bowblis, 2018. "The principal–agent problem and owner‐managers: An instrumental variables application to nursing home quality," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(11), pages 1653-1669, November.
    20. Ji Yeon Lee & Juh Hyun Shin, 2020. "Why Do They Stay? Intention to Stay among Registered Nurses in Nursing Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4582-4594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.