IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i23-24p4496-4503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical practitioners' perception of the dimensions of patient safety culture in a government hospital: A one‐sample correlational survey

Author

Listed:
  • Atallah Alenezi
  • Ramon Perley M. Pandaan
  • Joseph U. Almazan
  • Isabelita N. Pandaan
  • Franklyn S. Casison
  • Jonas Preposi Cruz

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the perceptions of clinical practitioners regarding the different dimensions of patient safety culture in their hospital and examine the work‐related predictors of patient safety culture perceptions. Background Patient safety is seen as a progressively critical focus in healthcare areas worldwide. Saudi Arabia aims to improve healthcare quality by providing access to healthcare for its increasing population. Hence, constantly assessing the patient safety culture of healthcare facilities in the country is imperative. Design One‐sample correlational survey design. Methods The Hospital Survey of Patients' Safety Culture was used to survey the total population sample of 181 healthcare practitioners in a Saudi hospital from December 2018–January 2019. Strengths and weaknesses on PS culture were identified as perceived by the clinical practitioners. Regression analysis was performed to identify the work‐related predictors of patient safety culture perceptions. The study followed the STROBE guideline. Results Nine of the 12 dimensions measured were identified as patient safety culture weaknesses, including ‘management support for patient safety’ (49.2%), ‘teamwork across unit’ (44.2%), ‘frequency of events reporting’ (43.1%), ‘communication openness’ (41.3%), ‘overall perception of patient safety’ (38.7%), ‘supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting patient safety’ (32.9%), ‘staffing’ (23.7%), ‘hospital handoffs and transitions’ (19.6%) and ‘non‐punitive response to errors’ (15.8%). None of the dimensions were identified as strengths by the respondents. Working hours per week and staff position were identified as significant predictors. Conclusions The study underscores the urgent need to improve the patient safety culture of the hospital. Relevance to clinical practice Hospital administrators should highlight initiatives on positive patient safety impact plan for clinical practitioners and patients, such as monitoring, reporting and strictly adhering to hospital activities that reduce the risks associated with exposure to medical care.

Suggested Citation

  • Atallah Alenezi & Ramon Perley M. Pandaan & Joseph U. Almazan & Isabelita N. Pandaan & Franklyn S. Casison & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Clinical practitioners' perception of the dimensions of patient safety culture in a government hospital: A one‐sample correlational survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4496-4503, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4496-4503
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Nahed Alquwez & Joseph Almazan & Ibrahim Mohammed Namis & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4582-4594, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4496-4503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.