IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnljam/v2020y2020i1n8276019.html

Quantile‐Based Estimative VaR Forecast and Dependence Measure: A Simulation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Khreshna Syuhada
  • Risti Nur’aini
  • Mahfudhotin

Abstract

A Value‐at‐Risk (VaR) forecast may be calculated for the case of a random loss alone and/or of a random loss that depends on another random loss. In both cases, the VaR forecast is obtained by employing its (conditional) probability distribution of loss data, specifically the quantile of loss distribution. In practice, we have an estimative VaR forecast in which the distribution parameter vector is replaced by its estimator. In this paper, the quantile‐based estimative VaR forecast for dependent random losses is explored through a simulation approach. It is found that the estimative VaR forecast is more accurate when a copula is employed. Furthermore, the stronger the dependence of a random loss to the target loss, in linear correlation, the larger/smaller the conditional mean/variance. In any dependence measure, generally, stronger and negative dependence gives a higher forecast. When there is a tail dependence, the use of upper and lower tail dependence provides a better forecast instead of the single correlation coefficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Khreshna Syuhada & Risti Nur’aini & Mahfudhotin, 2020. "Quantile‐Based Estimative VaR Forecast and Dependence Measure: A Simulation Approach," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2020(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2020:y:2020:i:1:n:8276019
    DOI: 10.1155/2020/8276019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8276019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2020/8276019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan-Hung Hsu Ku & Jai Jen Wang, 2008. "Estimating portfolio value-at-risk via dynamic conditional correlation MGARCH model - an empirical study on foreign exchange rates," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 533-538.
    2. Wai Yan Cheng & Michael Chak Sham Wong & Clement Yuk Pang Wong, 2003. "Market risk management of banks: implications from the accuracy of Value-at-Risk forecasts," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 23-33.
    3. Paolo Vidoni, 2004. "Improved prediction intervals for stochastic process models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 137-154, January.
    4. Nieto, Maria Rosa & Ruiz, Esther, 2016. "Frontiers in VaR forecasting and backtesting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 475-501.
    5. Fang, Hong-Bin & Fang, Kai-Tai & Kotz, Samuel, 2002. "The Meta-elliptical Distributions with Given Marginals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Paul Kabaila & Khreshna Syuhada, 2008. "Improved Prediction Limits For AR(p) and ARCH(p) Processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 213-223, March.
    7. Kabaila, Paul & Syuhada, Khreshna, 2010. "The asymptotic efficiency of improved prediction intervals," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(17-18), pages 1348-1353, September.
    8. Huang, Jen-Jsung & Lee, Kuo-Jung & Liang, Hueimei & Lin, Wei-Fu, 2009. "Estimating value at risk of portfolio by conditional copula-GARCH method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 315-324, December.
    9. Chin Diew Lai & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "Continuous Bivariate Distributions," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-0-387-09614-8, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bony Josaphat & Khreshna Syuhada, 2020. "Dependent Conditional Value-at-Risk for Aggregate Risk Models," Papers 2009.02904, arXiv.org.
    2. Eric Beutner & Alexander Heinemann & Stephan Smeekes, 2017. "A Justification of Conditional Confidence Intervals," Papers 1710.00643, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    3. He, Kaijian & Wang, Lijun & Zou, Yingchao & Lai, Kin Keung, 2014. "Value at risk estimation with entropy-based wavelet analysis in exchange markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 62-71.
    4. Syuhada, Khreshna & Hakim, Arief & Suprijanto, Djoko & Muchtadi-Alamsyah, Intan & Arbi, Lukman, 2022. "Is Tether a safe haven of safe haven amid COVID-19? An assessment against Bitcoin and oil using improved measures of risk," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Kaijian He & Kin Keung Lai & Guocheng Xiang, 2012. "Portfolio Value at Risk Estimate for Crude Oil Markets: A Multivariate Wavelet Denoising Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Kabaila, Paul & Syuhada, Khreshna, 2010. "The asymptotic efficiency of improved prediction intervals," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(17-18), pages 1348-1353, September.
    7. Marius Lux & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Stefan Lessmann, 2020. "Data driven value-at-risk forecasting using a SVR-GARCH-KDE hybrid," Papers 2009.06910, arXiv.org.
    8. Yao, Yinhong & Chen, Xiuwen & Chen, Zhensong, 2025. "Portfolio tail risk forecasting for international financial assets: A GARCH-MIDAS-R-Vine copula model," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Polanski, Arnold & Stoja, Evarist, 2017. "Forecasting multidimensional tail risk at short and long horizons," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 958-969.
    10. Bjoern Schulte-Tillmann & Mawuli Segnon & Timo Wiedemann, 2023. "A comparison of high-frequency realized variance measures: Duration- vs. return-based approaches," CQE Working Papers 10523, Center for Quantitative Economics (CQE), University of Muenster.
    11. Shilan Li & Jianxin Shi & Paul Albert & Hong-Bin Fang, 2022. "Dependence Structure Analysis and Its Application in Human Microbiome," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Wang Ruihua & Wang Hongjun, 2020. "Correlation Analysis of Stock Market and Fund Market Based on M-Copula-EGARCH-M-GED Model," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 240-252, June.
    13. Karmakar, Madhusudan & Paul, Samit, 2019. "Intraday portfolio risk management using VaR and CVaR:A CGARCH-EVT-Copula approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 699-709.
    14. Leung, Melvern & Li, Youwei & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Vigne, Samuel A., 2021. "Bayesian Value-at-Risk backtesting: The case of annuity pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 786-801.
    15. Harris, Richard D.F. & Nguyen, Linh H. & Stoja, Evarist, 2019. "Systematic extreme downside risk," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 128-142.
    16. Paolella, Marc S. & Polak, Paweł, 2015. "ALRIGHT: Asymmetric LaRge-scale (I)GARCH with Hetero-Tails," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 282-297.
    17. Wilson Calmon & Eduardo Ferioli & Davi Lettieri & Johann Soares & Adrian Pizzinga, 2021. "An Extensive Comparison of Some Well‐Established Value at Risk Methods," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 148-166, April.
    18. Laura Garcia‐Jorcano & Alfonso Novales, 2021. "Volatility specifications versus probability distributions in VaR forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 189-212, March.
    19. Yu, Xing & Zhang, Wei Guo & Liu, Yong Jun & Wang, Xinxin & Wang, Chao, 2020. "Hedging the exchange rate risk for international portfolios," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 85-104.
    20. Hallin, Marc & Trucíos, Carlos, 2023. "Forecasting value-at-risk and expected shortfall in large portfolios: A general dynamic factor model approach," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-15.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2020:y:2020:i:1:n:8276019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/4185 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.