IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnlamp/v2021y2021i1n2242807.html

[Retracted] The Statistical Analysis of Multidimensional Psychological Characteristics and User Feedback Willingness

Author

Listed:
  • Haiying Wang
  • Yaning Li
  • Chang Zhou
  • Haizhe Jin
  • Lin Wang

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the influence of multidimensional psychological characteristics on users’ feedback intention by using several statistical analysis methods based on information theory. The feedback process can be described as a communication process based on information theory. The feedback information entropy is associated with the degree of uncertainty elimination of the users who provide feedback information. Many factors are related to this uncertainty, such as information senders often stopped feedback process for some reasons and information senders may have provided fake or spam information. In order to encourage more useful feedback information, a model of a user’s willingness to provide feedback was established with personality traits and cognitive styles as independent variables, feedback motivation as intermediary variables, and feedback willingness as the dependent variable. 206 online and offline questionnaires were obtained to be analyzed by correlation analysis, regression analysis, and structural equation analysis. Cronbach’s α coefficient was used to test the reliability of the questionnaire, and exploratory factor analysis method was used to verify the validity of the questionnaire. First, correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between personality traits, cognitive styles, and motivation factors. Second, we further explored the strength of the relationship of the five correlated groups of variables through linear regression analysis. At last, we conducted structure equation analyses to test the hypotheses. The results show that both personality traits and cognitive styles can have a significant impact on feedback motivation factors and also show that self‐efficacy may be the only evident feedback motivation to encourage useful feedback information. The results show that the willing users with extraversion trait are more likely be motivated by self‐efficacy and thus have evident feedback willingness.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiying Wang & Yaning Li & Chang Zhou & Haizhe Jin & Lin Wang, 2021. "[Retracted] The Statistical Analysis of Multidimensional Psychological Characteristics and User Feedback Willingness," Advances in Mathematical Physics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2021(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnlamp:v:2021:y:2021:i:1:n:2242807
    DOI: 10.1155/2021/2242807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2242807
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2021/2242807?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fanyu Wang & Junyou Zhang & Shufeng Wang & Sixian Li & Wenlan Hou, 2020. "Analysis of Driving Behavior Based on Dynamic Changes of Personality States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Mahmoud Yasin & Lucia Porcu & Mohammed T. Abusharbeh & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2020. "The impact of customer personality and online brand community engagement on intention to forward company and users generated content: palestinian banking industry a case," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1985-2006, January.
    3. Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert & Andrew B. Whinston, 2001. "Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 225-239, September.
    4. Saima Yasmeen & Iram Batool & Ruqia Safdar Bajwa, 2020. "Learning Styles and Employee Creative Behavior; An Exploration Through Cognitive Styles," Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy Pakistan, vol. 6(1), pages 43-54, March.
    5. Chunhua Ju & Qiuyang Gu & Yi Fang & Fuguang Bao, 2020. "Research on User Influence Model Integrating Personality Traits under Strong Connection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanghyun Kim & Bora Kim & Minsoo Seo, 2020. "Impacts of Sustainable Information Technology Capabilities on Information Security Assimilation: The Moderating Effects of Policy—Technology Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Zhiling Guo & Gary J. Koehler & Andrew B. Whinston, 2012. "A Computational Analysis of Bundle Trading Markets Design for Distributed Resource Allocation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 823-843, September.
    3. Carol Hsu & Jae-Nam Lee & Detmar W. Straub, 2012. "Institutional Influences on Information Systems Security Innovations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-2), pages 918-939, September.
    4. Bahlmann, Jan & Spiller, Achim, 2008. "The Relationship between Supply Chain Coordination and Quality Assurance Systems: A Case Study Approach on the German Meat Sector," 110th Seminar, February 18-22, 2008, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 49768, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Tobias Widmer & Paul Karaenke & Vijayan Sugumaran, 2021. "Two‐sided service markets: Effects of quality differentiation on market efficiency," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 588-604, April.
    6. Kazem Haki & Michael Blaschke & Stephan Aier & Robert Winter, 2019. "A Value Co-creation Perspective on Information Systems Analysis and Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 487-502, August.
    7. Wil M. P. Aalst & Jörg Becker & Martin Bichler & Hans Ulrich Buhl & Jens Dibbern & Ulrich Frank & Ulrich Hasenkamp & Armin Heinzl & Oliver Hinz & Kai-Lung Hui & Matthias Jarke & Dimitris Karagiannis &, 2018. "Views on the Past, Present, and Future of Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(6), pages 443-477, December.
    8. Cordella, Antonio & Cordella, Tito, 2017. "Motivations, monitoring technologies, and pay for performance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 236-255.
    9. Dhillon, Sharanjit Kaur & Ibrahim, Roliana & Selamat, Ali, 2015. "Factors associated with scholarly publication productivity among academic staff: Case of a Malaysian public university," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 160-166.
    10. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Davis, Fred D. & Zhu, Yaping, 2022. "A cultural contingency model of knowledge sharing and job performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 202-219.
    11. Nelson Granados & Alok Gupta & Robert J. Kauffman, 2010. "Research Commentary---Information Transparency in Business-to-Consumer Markets: Concepts, Framework, and Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 207-226, June.
    12. Jie Lou & Yulin Fang & Kai H. Lim & Jerry Zeyu Peng, 2013. "Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&A communities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(2), pages 356-371, February.
    13. Wen-Bao Lin, 2013. "Research on knowledge sharing and interpersonal relationships: empirical study of family firms and non-family firms," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 151-166, January.
    14. N. Baptista & José Carlos Pinho & Helena Alves, 2021. "Examining social capital and online social support links: a study in online health communities facing treatment uncertainty," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(1), pages 57-94, March.
    15. T. S. Raghu & B. Jayaraman & H. R. Rao, 2004. "Toward an Integration of Agent- and Activity-Centric Approaches in Organizational Process Modeling: Incorporating Incentive Mechanisms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 316-335, December.
    16. Ostheimer, Julia & Chowdhury, Soumitra & Iqbal, Sarfraz, 2021. "An alliance of humans and machines for machine learning: Hybrid intelligent systems and their design principles," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Pereira, Vijay & Bamel, Umesh & Paul, Happy & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Personality and safety behavior: An analysis of worldwide research on road and traffic safety leading to organizational and policy implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 185-196.
    18. Lin, Hui & Hwang, Yujong, 2021. "The effects of personal information management capabilities and social-psychological factors on accounting professionals’ knowledge-sharing intentions: Pre and post COVID-19," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    19. Mitra, Amit & O'Regan, Nicholas & Sarpong, David, 2018. "Cloud resource adaptation: A resource based perspective on value creation for corporate growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 28-38.
    20. Simon Hemmrich & Ulvi Ibrahimli, 2025. "Reconceptualizing Blockchain-Based Reputation Systems: Applying Systems Theory with Basic Concepts," Working Papers Dissertations 151, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnlamp:v:2021:y:2021:i:1:n:2242807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/3197 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.