IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n7445124.html

Optimization Analysis of Advertising Information Resource Allocation in View of the Dynamic Game Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Han

Abstract

Advertising has become the most important part of emerging advertising media with rich content, vivid form, huge browsing volume, and exponential growth in market share. It brings huge profits to operators and advertisers participating in bidding every year. Formulate reasonable allocation rules and payment rules for advertising resources in advertising space sales. The advertising configuration platform mainly has three functions: the entry function of home page advertising, serving the company’s operation department and storing the advertising information entered by operation, with a large amount of data, involving more than a dozen tables. The advertisement output function outputs the advertisement of the storage layer through the interface in JSON data format. This part of the function serves the downstream systems, such as mobile phone clients and PC. Starting from the requirements’ analysis, this study introduces the platform design and the analysis method logic, shows the implementation of the platform, and then analyzes and describes the test process from the aspects of function and performance. Based on the review and summary of the formation and characteristics of the competitive structure of China’s advertising market and the research results of foreign advertising classification, this study makes a qualitative and quantitative study on the competitive strategy of China’s advertising game by using the principles of service marketing and advertising, the classical model of oligarch competitive structure, game theory, differential game, and dynamic optimization. In terms of qualitative research, this study discusses the impact of advertising on China’s market competition pattern and the advertising game strategy through the comparative study of advertising and the analysis of market characteristics. The study found that due to the high barriers to entry of the advertising market and the intangibility of products, the strategy of putting category advertising and information advertising should be adopted. In quantitative research, based on the Sethi model, this study discusses the advertising game strategy model of the Oligarchic competition structure. The important conclusions include the profitability of enterprises from the market share is the most important factor to determine the market share and advertising expenditure. The impact of advertising on market share is obvious. The role of advertising expenditure has a time lag. Drastic changes in the scale of advertising expenditure will cause long‐term fluctuations in the market structure. The research method has a certain universality, so the research results can also be used for reference for the advertising strategy of other industries with oligopoly competition structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Han, 2022. "Optimization Analysis of Advertising Information Resource Allocation in View of the Dynamic Game Model," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:7445124
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/7445124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7445124
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/7445124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kemal Guler & Martin Bichler & Ioannis Petrakis, 2016. "Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 609-639, May.
    2. Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu, 2017. "Optimal Timing of Advertising with Demand Spillovers," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 43-60, March.
    3. Subodha Kumar & Vijay Mookerjee & Abhinav Shubham, 2018. "Research in Operations Management and Information Systems Interface," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(11), pages 1893-1905, November.
    4. Caggiani, Leonardo & Camporeale, Rosalia & Marinelli, Mario & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2019. "User satisfaction based model for resource allocation in bike-sharing systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 117-126.
    5. Shaohua Han & John S. Heywood & Guangliang Ye, 2017. "Informative Advertising in a Mixed Oligopoly," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 51(1), pages 103-125, August.
    6. Bayrak, Halil I. & Pınar, Mustafa Ç., 2016. "Generalized second price auction is optimal for discrete types," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 35-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaur, Harpreet & Gupta, Mahima & Singh, Surya Prakash, 2024. "Integrated model to optimize supplier selection and investments for cyber resilience in digital supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. Guo, Hainan & Xie, Yue & Jiang, Bowen & Tang, Jiafu, 2024. "When outpatient appointment meets online consultation: A joint scheduling optimization framework," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Maximilian Klöckner & Christoph G. Schmidt & Stephan M. Wagner, 2022. "When Blockchain Creates Shareholder Value: Empirical Evidence from International Firm Announcements," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 46-64, January.
    4. Chaklader, Barnali & Gupta, Brij B. & Panigrahi, Prabin Kumar, 2023. "Analyzing the progress of FINTECH-companies and their integration with new technologies for innovation and entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Wei Zhao & Qianqian Ben Liu & Xitong Guo & Tianshi Wu & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Quid pro quo in online medical consultation? Investigating the effects of small monetary gifts from patients," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1698-1718, April.
    6. Zhijun Yan & Lini Kuang & Liangfei Qiu, 2022. "Prosocial behaviors and economic performance: Evidence from an online mental healthcare platform," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3859-3876, October.
    7. Yu Zhou & Qin Li & Xiaohang Yue & Jiajia Nie & Qiang Guo, 2026. "A novel predict-then-optimize method for sustainable bike-sharing management: a data-driven study in China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(1), pages 5-37, April.
    8. Lingli Wang & Ni Huang & Yili Hong & Luning Liu & Xunhua Guo & Guoqing Chen, 2023. "Voice‐based AI in call center customer service: A natural field experiment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(4), pages 1002-1018, April.
    9. Xue Luo & Li Li & Lei Zhao & Jianfeng Lin, 2022. "Dynamic Intra-Cell Repositioning in Free-Floating Bike-Sharing Systems Using Approximate Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 799-826, July.
    10. Chang, Jasmine (Aichih) & Katehakis, Michael N. & Shi, Jim (Junmin) & Yan, Zhipeng, 2021. "Blockchain-empowered Newsvendor optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    11. Zijia Wang & Lei Cheng & Yongxing Li & Zhiqiang Li, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Bike-Sharing Usage around Rail Transit Stations: Evidence from Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Foschi, Rachele, 2023. "A Point Processes approach to bicycle sharing systems’ design and management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    13. Kamyar Kargar & Halil Ibrahim Bayrak & Mustafa Çelebi Pinar, 2018. "Robust bilateral trade with discrete types," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(4), pages 367-393, December.
    14. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Wael Jabr & Dennis Kundisch, 2020. "The Fate of the App: Economic Implications of Updating under Reputation Resetting," Working Papers Dissertations 76, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    15. Alekh Gour & Shikha Aggarwal & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Lending ears to unheard voices: An empirical analysis of user‐generated content on social media," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2457-2476, June.
    16. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Zahra Seyedghorban & Hossein Tahernejad & Danny Samson, 2022. "Why emerging supply chain technologies initially disappoint: Blockchain, IoT, and AI," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2517-2537, June.
    17. Radha Mookerjee & Jayarajan Samuel, 2023. "Managing the security of information systems with partially observable vulnerability," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(9), pages 2902-2920, September.
    18. Elżbieta Macioszek & Paulina Świerk & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Bike-Sharing System as an Element of Enhancing Sustainable Mobility—A Case Study based on a City in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.
    19. Gopesh Anand & Eric C. Larson & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2020. "Thomas Kuhn on Paradigms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1650-1657, July.
    20. Kumar Dey, Bibhas & Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen, 2021. "A framework for estimating bikeshare origin destination flows using a multiple discrete continuous system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 119-133.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:7445124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.