IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v39y2020i8p1198-1212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive models for influence of primary delays using high‐speed train operation records

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongcan Li
  • Ping Huang
  • Chao Wen
  • Yixiong Tang
  • Xi Jiang

Abstract

Primary delays are the driving force behind delay propagation, and predicting the number of affected trains (NAT) and the total time of affected trains (TTAT) due to primary delay (PD) can provide reliable decision support for real‐time train dispatching. In this paper, based on real operation data from 2015 to 2016 at several stations along the Wuhan–Guangzhou high‐speed railway, NAT and TTAT influencing factors were determined after analyzing the PD propagation mechanism. The eXtreme Gradient BOOSTing (XGBOOST) algorithm was used to establish a NAT predictive model, and several machine learning methods were compared. The importance of different delayinfluencing factors was investigated. Then, the TTAT predictive model (using support vector regression (SVR) algorithms) was established based on the NAT predictive model. Results indicated that the XGBOOST algorithm performed well with the NAT predictive model, and SVR was the optimal model for TTAT prediction under the verification index (i.e., the ratio of the difference between the actual and predicted value was less than 1/2/3/4/5 min). Real operational data in 2018 were used to test the applicability of the NAT and TTAT models over time, and findings suggest that these models exhibit sound applicability over time based on XGBOOST and SVR, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongcan Li & Ping Huang & Chao Wen & Yixiong Tang & Xi Jiang, 2020. "Predictive models for influence of primary delays using high‐speed train operation records," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(8), pages 1198-1212, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:39:y:2020:i:8:p:1198-1212
    DOI: 10.1002/for.2685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2685
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.2685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huisman, Tijs & Boucherie, Richard J. & van Dijk, Nico M., 2002. "A solvable queueing network model for railway networks and its validation and applications for the Netherlands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 30-51, October.
    2. Goverde, Rob M.P., 2007. "Railway timetable stability analysis using max-plus system theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 179-201, February.
    3. Chao Wen & Zhongcan Li & Javad Lessan & Liping Fu & Ping Huang & Chaozhe Jiang, 2017. "Statistical investigation on train primary delay based on real records: evidence from Wuhan–Guangzhou HSR," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 170-189, July.
    4. Meester, Ludolf E. & Muns, Sander, 2007. "Stochastic delay propagation in railway networks and phase-type distributions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 218-230, February.
    5. Huisman, Tijs & Boucherie, Richard J., 2001. "Running times on railway sections with heterogeneous train traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 271-292, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiong, Kah Yong & Ma, Zhenliang & Palmqvist, Carl-William, 2023. "Analyzing factors contributing to real-time train arrival delays using seemingly unrelated regression models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Ping & Wen, Chao & Fu, Liping & Lessan, Javad & Jiang, Chaozhe & Peng, Qiyuan & Xu, Xinyue, 2020. "Modeling train operation as sequences: A study of delay prediction with operation and weather data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Harshad Khadilkar, 2017. "Data-Enabled Stochastic Modeling for Evaluating Schedule Robustness of Railway Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1161-1176, November.
    3. Maosheng Li & Zhengqiu Liu & Yonghong Zhang & Weijun Liu & Feng Shi, 2017. "Distribution analysis of train interval journey time employing the censored model with shifting character," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 715-733, March.
    4. Chao Wen & Weiwei Mou & Ping Huang & Zhongcan Li, 2020. "A predictive model of train delays on a railway line," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 470-488, April.
    5. Mu, Shi & Dessouky, Maged, 2013. "Efficient dispatching rules on double tracks with heterogeneous train traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 45-64.
    6. Roy, Debjit & van Ommeren, Jan-Kees & de Koster, René & Gharehgozli, Amir, 2022. "Modeling landside container terminal queues: Exact analysis and approximations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 73-102.
    7. Jovanović, Predrag & Kecman, Pavle & Bojović, Nebojša & Mandić, Dragomir, 2017. "Optimal allocation of buffer times to increase train schedule robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 44-54.
    8. Vromans, Michiel J.C.M. & Dekker, Rommert & Kroon, Leo G., 2006. "Reliability and heterogeneity of railway services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 647-665, July.
    9. Wei, Dali & Liu, Hongchao & Qin, Yong, 2015. "Modeling cascade dynamics of railway networks under inclement weather," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 95-122.
    10. M. Shakibayifar & A. Sheikholeslami & F. Corman & E. Hassannayebi, 2020. "An integrated rescheduling model for minimizing train delays in the case of line blockage," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 59-87, March.
    11. Francesco Rotoli & Elena Navajas Cawood & Antonio Soria, 2016. "Capacity assessment of railway infrastructure: Tools, methodologies and policy relevance in the EU context," JRC Research Reports JRC100509, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    12. Leachman, Robert C. & Jula, Payman, 2012. "Estimating flow times for containerized imports from Asia to the United States through the Western rail network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 296-309.
    13. Krier, Betty & Liu, Chia-Mei & McNamara, Brian & Sharpe, Jerrod, 2014. "Individual freight effects, capacity utilization, and Amtrak service quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 163-175.
    14. Stefan Christian Alexander Hudak & Tadej Brezina & Johannes Kehrer & Josef Michael Schopf, 2023. "Tracing rail transformation: the case of passenger services in Slovenia from 1975 to 2015," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 253-274, March.
    15. Franciszek Restel & Łukasz Wolniewicz & Matea Mikulčić, 2021. "Method for Designing Robust and Energy Efficient Railway Schedules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Reisch, Julian, 2020. "State of the art overview on automatic railway timetable generation and optimization," Discussion Papers 2020/20, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    17. Nan Cao & Tao Tang & Chunhai Gao, 2020. "A Study of Hindrance-Caused Unscheduled Waiting Time in Railway Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Ursani, Ziauddin & Mei, T.X. & Whiteing, Anthony, 2013. "A fault tolerance approach for railway scheduling and train control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 161-173.
    19. Thomas Spanninger & Beda Büchel & Francesco Corman, 2023. "Train Delay Predictions Using Markov Chains Based on Process Time Deviations and Elastic State Boundaries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Flurin S. Hänseler & Nicholas A. Molyneaux & Michel Bierlaire, 2017. "Estimation of Pedestrian Origin-Destination Demand in Train Stations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 981-997, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:39:y:2020:i:8:p:1198-1212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.