IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i14p5754-d385803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Hindrance-Caused Unscheduled Waiting Time in Railway Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Cao

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    National Engineering Laboratory for Urban Rail Transit Communication and Operation Control, Beijing 100044, China
    Traffic Control Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing 100070, China)

  • Tao Tang

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Chunhai Gao

    (National Engineering Laboratory for Urban Rail Transit Communication and Operation Control, Beijing 100044, China
    Traffic Control Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing 100070, China)

Abstract

In real operation, railway traffic always deviates from schedule due to exogenous disturbances and disruptions, and these deviations may cause a domino effect over the whole network. Therefore, evaluating and predicting the influence of these disturbances is of significance in train operation and dispatching. Delay is a commonly used performance indicator to describe degree of these deviations, and it may propagate to other trains. The main cause of delay is the overtime occupation on exclusive blocks. However, hindrance, which evaluates the performance of railway operation from the perspective of infrastructure occupancy, is seldom studied. In this paper, a systematical description and calculation of hindrance in railway systems is introduced from the perspective of infrastructure occupancy based on blocking time theory. The railway network was modeled as several exclusive components with running directions. Based on the precedence order and length of occupancy on conflicting infrastructure components, a sequential hindrance propagation process was identified. The proposed methods were demonstrated through the case of a reference network based on railway simulations. A relationship between the overall influence of hindrance and the length of hindrance was investigated for each infrastructure component, using statistical techniques. The results proved a clear positive relationship between the overall influence of a hindrance and its length. In addition, this relationship is affected by the location of infrastructure and amount of traffic flow in the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Cao & Tao Tang & Chunhai Gao, 2020. "A Study of Hindrance-Caused Unscheduled Waiting Time in Railway Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5754-:d:385803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5754/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5754/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meester, Ludolf E. & Muns, Sander, 2007. "Stochastic delay propagation in railway networks and phase-type distributions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 218-230, February.
    2. Olsson, Nils O.E. & Haugland, Hans, 2004. "Influencing factors on train punctuality--results from some Norwegian studies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 387-397, October.
    3. Vansteenwegen, P. & Oudheusden, D. Van, 2006. "Developing railway timetables which guarantee a better service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 337-350, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Wen & Weiwei Mou & Ping Huang & Zhongcan Li, 2020. "A predictive model of train delays on a railway line," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 470-488, April.
    2. Jovanović, Predrag & Kecman, Pavle & Bojović, Nebojša & Mandić, Dragomir, 2017. "Optimal allocation of buffer times to increase train schedule robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 44-54.
    3. Agbelie, Bismark & Libnao, Kathleen, 2018. "Unobserved heterogeneity analysis of rail transit incident delays," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 39-43.
    4. Krier, Betty & Liu, Chia-Mei & McNamara, Brian & Sharpe, Jerrod, 2014. "Individual freight effects, capacity utilization, and Amtrak service quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 163-175.
    5. Rachel C. W. Wong & Tony W. Y. Yuen & Kwok Wah Fung & Janny M. Y. Leung, 2008. "Optimizing Timetable Synchronization for Rail Mass Transit," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 57-69, February.
    6. Harshad Khadilkar, 2017. "Data-Enabled Stochastic Modeling for Evaluating Schedule Robustness of Railway Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1161-1176, November.
    7. Franciszek Restel & Łukasz Wolniewicz & Matea Mikulčić, 2021. "Method for Designing Robust and Energy Efficient Railway Schedules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Guo, Xin & Wu, Jianjun & Sun, Huijun & Yang, Xin & Jin, Jian Gang & Wang, David Z.W., 2020. "Scheduling synchronization in urban rail transit networks: Trade-offs between transfer passenger and last train operation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 463-490.
    9. Sobrie, Léon & Verschelde, Marijn & Hennebel, Veerle & Roets, Bart, 2023. "Capturing complexity over space and time via deep learning: An application to real-time delay prediction in railways," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1201-1217.
    10. Konstantinos Gkiotsalitis & Nitin Maslekar, 2018. "Towards transfer synchronization of regularity-based bus operations with sequential hill-climbing," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 335-361, August.
    11. Xue, Hongjiao & Jia, Limin & Li, Jian & Guo, Jianyuan, 2022. "Jointly optimized demand-oriented train timetable and passenger flow control strategy for a congested subway line under a short-turning operation pattern," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    12. Jaime Larumbe, 2021. "Evaluating Sustainability of Mass Rapid Transit Stations in Dubai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Jian Li & Lu Zhang & Bu Liu & Ningning Shi & Liang Li & Haodong Yin, 2023. "Travel-Energy-Based Timetable Optimization in Urban Subway Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Xie, J. & Wong, S.C. & Zhan, S. & Lo, S.M. & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Train schedule optimization based on schedule-based stochastic passenger assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Andreas Økland & Nils O. E. Olsson, 2021. "Punctuality development and delay explanation factors on Norwegian railways in the period 2005–2014," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 127-161, March.
    16. Liang, Jinpeng & Zang, Guangzhi & Liu, Haitao & Zheng, Jianfeng & Gao, Ziyou, 2023. "Reducing passenger waiting time in oversaturated metro lines with passenger flow control policy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Thomas Spanninger & Beda Büchel & Francesco Corman, 2023. "Train Delay Predictions Using Markov Chains Based on Process Time Deviations and Elastic State Boundaries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Maosheng Li & Zhengqiu Liu & Yonghong Zhang & Weijun Liu & Feng Shi, 2017. "Distribution analysis of train interval journey time employing the censored model with shifting character," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 715-733, March.
    19. Zhichao Cao & Zhenzhou Yuan & Silin Zhang, 2016. "Performance Analysis of Stop-Skipping Scheduling Plans in Rail Transit under Time-Dependent Demand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Can Akkan & Ayla Gülcü & Zeki Kuş, 2022. "Bi-criteria simulated annealing for the curriculum-based course timetabling problem with robustness approximation," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 477-501, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5754-:d:385803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.