IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v35y2026i3p423-438.html

Scale, Skill‐Mix, and Access Implications of the Production of Appointments by Primary Care Practices in England

Author

Listed:
  • Tianchang Zhao
  • Rachel Meacock
  • Matt Sutton

Abstract

Primary medical care has traditionally been provided by small organisations. Recent policy developments in many countries have encouraged larger practices in the hope of benefiting from increasing returns to scale, but there is little research evidence to support this. Using monthly data from 6149 primary care practices in England between August 2022 and July 2024, we applied a Generalized Linear Model with a logarithmic link and Poisson distribution to examine the relationship between staffing levels and appointment volumes. At the median level of administrative staffing, the estimated marginal productivity of doctors and other clinical staff on total appointments are 223 and 152 per month, respectively. The marginal effects of all types of staff on appointment volumes increase with staffing levels. We plot the isoquant and isocost curves at the median level of production and examine the implications of our findings for skill‐mix and patient access. The current ratios of doctors to other clinical staff and nurses to Direct Patient Care (DPC) staff are lower than cost optimal, though this is less of an issue for larger practices who benefit more from DPC roles. Additional clinical staff improve patient access more when employed in larger practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianchang Zhao & Rachel Meacock & Matt Sutton, 2026. "Scale, Skill‐Mix, and Access Implications of the Production of Appointments by Primary Care Practices in England," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 423-438, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:423-438
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.70064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70064
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.70064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:423-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.