IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v33y2022i2ne2711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalization of the power‐law rating curve using hydrodynamic theory and Bayesian hierarchical modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Birgir Hrafnkelsson
  • Helgi Sigurdarson
  • Sölvi Rögnvaldsson
  • Axel Örn Jansson
  • Rafael Daníel Vias
  • Sigurdur M. Gardarsson

Abstract

The power‐law rating curve has been used extensively in hydraulic practice and hydrology. It is given by Q(h)=a(h−c)b, where Q is discharge, h is water elevation, a, b, and c are unknown parameters. We propose a novel extension of the power‐law rating curve, referred to as the generalized power‐law rating curve. It is constructed by linking the physics of open channel flow to a model of the form Q(h)=a(h−c)f(h). The function f(h) is referred to as the power‐law exponent and it depends on the water elevation. The proposed model and the power‐law model are fitted within the framework of Bayesian hierarchical models. By exploring the properties of the proposed rating curve and its power‐law exponent, we find that cross‐sectional shapes that are likely to be found in nature are such that the power‐law exponent f(h) will usually be in the interval [1.0,2.67]. This fact is utilized for the construction of prior densities for the model parameters. An efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling scheme, that utilizes the lognormal distributional assumption at the data level and Gaussian assumption at the latent level, is proposed for the two models. The two statistical models were applied to four datasets. In the case of three datasets the generalized power‐law rating curve gave a better fit than the power‐law rating curve while in the fourth case the two models fitted equally well and the generalized power‐law rating curve mimicked the power‐law rating curve. We developed an R package, bdrc, for fitting the power‐law and generalized power‐law rating curve models. It is available on CRAN.

Suggested Citation

  • Birgir Hrafnkelsson & Helgi Sigurdarson & Sölvi Rögnvaldsson & Axel Örn Jansson & Rafael Daníel Vias & Sigurdur M. Gardarsson, 2022. "Generalization of the power‐law rating curve using hydrodynamic theory and Bayesian hierarchical modeling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:33:y:2022:i:2:n:e2711
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2711
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    2. Geir-Arne Fuglstad & Daniel Simpson & Finn Lindgren & Håvard Rue, 2019. "Constructing Priors that Penalize the Complexity of Gaussian Random Fields," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(525), pages 445-452, January.
    3. A. N. Sigurdarson & B. Hrafnkelsson, 2016. "Bayesian prediction of monthly precipitation on a fine grid using covariates based on a regional meteorological model," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 27-41, February.
    4. Yin-hui Wang & Yi-song Zou & Lue-qin Xu & Zheng Luo, 2015. "Analysis of Water Flow Pressure on Bridge Piers considering the Impact Effect," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-8, May.
    5. Calderhead, Ben & Girolami, Mark, 2009. "Estimating Bayes factors via thermodynamic integration and population MCMC," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4028-4045, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. A. Alegana & C. Pezzulo & A. J. Tatem & B. Omar & A. Christensen, 2021. "Mapping out-of-school adolescents and youths in low- and middle-income countries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Jorge Sicacha-Parada & Diego Pavon-Jordan & Ingelin Steinsland & Roel May & Bård Stokke & Ingar Jostein Øien, 2022. "A Spatial Modeling Framework for Monitoring Surveys with Different Sampling Protocols with a Case Study for Bird Abundance in Mid-Scandinavia," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 562-591, September.
    3. Youngbin Lym & Hyobin Lym & Keekwang Kim & Ki-Jung Kim, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Associations between Local Safety Level Index and COVID-19 Infection Risks across Capital Regions in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    5. Mumtaz, Haroon & Theodoridis, Konstantinos, 2017. "Common and country specific economic uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 205-216.
    6. Jesse Elliott & Zemin Bai & Shu-Ching Hsieh & Shannon E Kelly & Li Chen & Becky Skidmore & Said Yousef & Carine Zheng & David J Stewart & George A Wells, 2020. "ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    8. Francois Olivier & Laval Guillaume, 2011. "Deviance Information Criteria for Model Selection in Approximate Bayesian Computation," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Raggi, Davide & Bordignon, Silvano, 2012. "Long memory and nonlinearities in realized volatility: A Markov switching approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3730-3742.
    10. Angelica Gianfreda & Francesco Ravazzolo & Luca Rossini, 2023. "Large Time‐Varying Volatility Models for Hourly Electricity Prices," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 85(3), pages 545-573, June.
    11. Rubio, F.J. & Steel, M.F.J., 2011. "Inference for grouped data with a truncated skew-Laplace distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3218-3231, December.
    12. Alessandri, Piergiorgio & Mumtaz, Haroon, 2019. "Financial regimes and uncertainty shocks," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 31-46.
    13. Padilla, Juan L. & Azevedo, Caio L.N. & Lachos, Victor H., 2018. "Multidimensional multiple group IRT models with skew normal latent trait distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 250-268.
    14. Svetlana V. Tishkovskaya & Paul G. Blackwell, 2021. "Bayesian estimation of heterogeneous environments from animal movement data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
    15. David Macro & Jeroen Weesie, 2016. "Inequalities between Others Do Matter: Evidence from Multiplayer Dictator Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Tautenhahn, Susanne & Heilmeier, Hermann & Jung, Martin & Kahl, Anja & Kattge, Jens & Moffat, Antje & Wirth, Christian, 2012. "Beyond distance-invariant survival in inverse recruitment modeling: A case study in Siberian Pinus sylvestris forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 233(C), pages 90-103.
    17. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    18. Simon Mak & Derek Bingham & Yi Lu, 2016. "A regional compound Poisson process for hurricane and tropical storm damage," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(5), pages 677-703, November.
    19. Xi, Yanhui & Peng, Hui & Qin, Yemei & Xie, Wenbiao & Chen, Xiaohong, 2015. "Bayesian analysis of heavy-tailed market microstructure model and its application in stock markets," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 141-153.
    20. Huang, Zhaodong & Chien, Steven & Zhu, Wei & Zheng, Pengjun, 2022. "Scheduling wheel inspection for sustainable urban rail transit operation: A Bayesian approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:33:y:2022:i:2:n:e2711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.